Re: Spam targeting nnn-done@bugs.d.o

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2018-02-21 10:53:49 [-0800], Don Armstrong wrote: > > We basically already do this with our ZIPFILE, MSWORD, and ZIPCOMPRESSED > > rules: > > > >

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > I do really hope that we can have a good backend for guestuser and dm > > authorisation and authentiction at the end of the summer. Something like > > ud-ldap that can ser

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: Hi Enrico, > > > Are there other ways in stretch of getting apache to authenticate > > > against gitlab? > > I would wait for the gsoc project. And on the alioth sprint, several people > > decided against using salsa as backend for sso, but the other way

Re: Status Debian Single Sign On + Alioth replacements

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:44:16PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > El 23/02/18 a las 20:51, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: > > > > El 23/02/18 a las 19:42, Geert Stapp

Re: Status Debian Single Sign On + Alioth replacements

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:53:59PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > El 23/02/18 a las 20:51, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: > > > El 23/02/18 a las 19:42, Geert Stappers escribió: > > > > > >> > > >> I went to Debian wiki, searched for 'SSO' > > >>

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:54:29PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > > Are there other

Re: Status Debian Single Sign On + Alioth replacements

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:32:24PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:54:29PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Z

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:54:29PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > > > > > Are the

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Are there other ways in stretch of getting apache to authenticate > > > against gitlab? > > I would wait for the gsoc project. And on the alioth spri

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:08:31PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > > From a user (non-DD)'s perspective, current best plan should be the > > integration > > with Salsa GitLab user database. Works on such implementation are surely > > needed > > though. >

Re: What can Debian do to provide complex applications to its users?

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 21 février 2018 07:07 +0100, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> : > > > No, backports doesn't have official security support in the meaning that > > the team is tracking and looking after security issues in backports

Re: What can Debian do to provide complex applications to its users?

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 20 février 2018 09:05 +0200, Arto Jantunen  : > > >> Moreover, backports do not accept security patches. You can only push a > >> version in testing (or unstable). Notably, if the version in testing is > >> not easily backportable

Re: Raising the problem of Debian Single Sign On + Alioth (again)

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hello all, > > I just recalled that an issue was left behind during the Alioth -> > Salsa migration: > sso.debian.org 's Alioth account integration with Alioth platform. This > service > seems to have no migration plan (yet) and will break many other

Re: Default page view for salsa repositories

On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 01/18/2018 12:15 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > >> On 18 January 2018 at 11:15, Alex Mestiashvili <ames...@rsh2.donotuse.de> > >> wrote: > >

Re: Updating the Maintainer field in preparation for Alioth's shutdown?

On Sat, 20 Jan 2018, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 10:29:44AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > The February date is indeed now very soon and it's unlikely we would > > have this in place in time. However my understanding from the alioth > > admins is that this wasn't a hard

Re: Default page view for salsa repositories

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 18 January 2018 at 11:15, Alex Mestiashvili > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > while browsing through salsa.debian.org packages I got a feeling that > > displaying upstream's Readme by default is not exactly relevant

Re: salsa access as debian maintainer

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. > > > unless DM information is available in udldap. > > I'm not familar with udldap. Is this something where I or someone else > should take action? Debian Maintainers are not the Debian usermanagement system. Therefore we

Re: salsa access as debian maintainer

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Nico Schlömer wrote: Hi, > I'm a Debian maintainer and the projects I'm working with have recently > been moved from alioth to salsa. It seems that right now only Debian > _developers_ have a login to salsa. Is this something that will change in > the future or should I make

Re: Salsa Beta - Updates

On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Norbert, > > we wanted to give you some updates and news about our salsa beta. > > Thanks for the update, but I would like to know about the "beta" status. > In your first announcement email you mentioned that library resets are > possible etc

Re: Ssh access on salsa denied

On Mon, 08 Jan 2018, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Alexander Wirt writes: > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I verified in the web interface on Salsa that my public ssh key > >> from alioth was imported and t

Re: Ssh access on salsa denied

On Sun, 07 Jan 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I verified in the web interface on Salsa that my public ssh key > from alioth was imported and to be very sure I uploaded it again. > Unfortunately this does not changed anything > >$ ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa_debian2 ti...@salsa.debian.org >

Re: Salsa Beta - Updates

On Sat, 06 Jan 2018, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 06/01/18 00:30, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > > Alexander (formorer) is running an Irker instance on one of its own > > VMs. Irker can send push events to an IRC channel. Please check the > > wiki[2] for details on how to use it. > > > > We are not

Re: Marking bugs as pending for salsa.d.o

On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote: Hi, > In Article <87mv1um3bd@delenn.ganneff.de>, > Joerg Jaspert writes: > > > I'm on it, code lives in https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/webhook > > Your code looks so beautiful, i am a fan for Ruby. > > So we

Re: Marking bugs as pending for salsa.d.o

On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > In the Git repositories of packages that I maintain at alioth.d.o, a > script [*] is called in the post-receive hook for tagging the bugs listed in > the meta tag "Closes:" of gbp-dch as "pending". > > Is there a way to have a similar integration

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Alexander Wirt: " Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going > into beta" (Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:04:59 +0100): > > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 a

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter > > That seems to generate a list of 'RewriteRule's directives. May I > recommend to instead use

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 30, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Anyway, looking forward to your map thing :-) > > First draft is on https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter > Can you first apply some regexp-bas

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:51:45PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > On F

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Or more precisely it was a design flaw from the beginning which was > > > intended to be cured with the wor

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed > > > and > > &

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and > > not yet migrated repos. > Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 12/29/2017 12:51 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and > >> not yet migrated repos. &g

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's > > > git repos. And that's one of the

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 16:02:08 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > I think we should request the list something like > > > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.o

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 16:02 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > 2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org>: > > > > Maintainer: Debian

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2017-12-26 15:05 GMT+01:00 Ole Streicher : > > Maintainer: Debian Science Team > > I think we should request the list something like > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org > and use it instead of

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 26, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Unfortunately that is something that has to be done. At least unless someone > > wants to write some kind of redirection map. > I am really surprised that this

Re: Team naming policy on salsa.debian.org

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Teams > > - > > > > For larger projects you can also create a group to host your projects. > > To avoid clashes with usernames (that sh

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 26 December 2017 at 11:03, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > >> On 26 December 2017 at 10:22, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org&g

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 26 December 2017 at 10:22, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 08:16:41AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> &g

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 08:16:41AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > I am not looking forward to update all Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser headers > > > currently ref

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 25, Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Every user can create projects in their own namespace (similar to GitHub). > What about git repository URLs? > I am not looking forward to update all Vcs-Git

Re: salsa.debian.org (git.debian.org replacement) going into beta

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, > first of all: thanks a lot for all your work on this! > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > External users are invited to create an account on salsa. > > do you plan importing the current

Accepted keepalived 1:1.3.9-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:23:16 +0100 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.3.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Re: Auto-update for sid? Auto-backport?

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le mercredi, 15 novembre 2017, 16.43:17 h CET Steffen Möller a écrit : > > I would really like to see updates performed in some automated fashion. > > Debian updates are in fact different steps: > * inclusion of upstream changes; > * packaging

Re: RFP: pgadmin4 -- Web administration tool for PostgreSQL

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Denis Briand wrote: Hi, > * Package name : pgadmin > * Version : 4 > * Upstream Author : Dave Page > * URL : https://www.pgadmin.org > * License : PostgreSQL/Artistic licence https://www.pgadmin.org/licence/ > * Description : Web administration tool for PostgreSQL > >

Re: Concerns about infrastructure for Alioth replacement

l > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:32:55PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:28:09 + Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > Francesco, great idea,

Re: Concerns about infrastructure for Alioth replacement

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:28:09 + Ondřej Surý wrote: > > [...] > > Francesco, great idea, go ahead. You would be most welcome to help with > > Debian Ruby Extra packaging. > > Unfortunately, I have basically zero knowledge about Rails, JavaScript >

Re: Concerns about infrastructure for Alioth replacement

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Montag, den 16.10.2017, 07:22 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I am a Debian contributor (and Alioth user). > > > > > > First

Re: Concerns about infrastructure for Alioth replacement

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hello, > I am a Debian contributor (and Alioth user). > > First off, I think that [replacing] Alioth with something more > maintainable is a good thing to do and I am grateful to the people who > are working hard to make this happen. > > [replacing]:

Re: [Alioth-staff-replacement] Alioth: Concerns about git URLs and groups/teams

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Ondřej Surý wrote: > FWIW gitlab now supports groups, subgroups and projects + granular > permissions per those. Jupp, we will do teams as subgroups in a defined namespace with admin permissions to the team admin. Alex

Re: Alioth: Concerns about git URLs and groups/teams

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > First off, and just to be clear, I think decomissioning Alioth is a > good thing given its current state! Thanks for that. > > One concern is whether we'll be needing to mass switch yet again git > repo URLs for the nth time? The nice thing

Re: Alioth: the future of mailing lists

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:42:20 +0200, Martin Steigerwald > wrote: > >Would it be possible with reasonable effort to synchronize spam filtering > >configuration from lists.debian.org to that potential new mailing list > >server? > >

Re: Alioth: the future of mailing lists

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 21:53:43 +0200, Alexander Wirt > <formo...@formorer.de> wrote: > >On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> I have managed mailman installations for some time so I'm fairly familiar > >> w

Re: Alioth: the future of mailing lists

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:22:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 01:57:31AM +0100, peter green wrote: > > > Just because a team isn't big or established doesn't mean they don't need > > > a place to discuss issues

Re: How to start a new packaging team now?

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 18.09.2017 um 18:00 schrieb Jonathan Carter (highvoltage): > > > Well, it's not official yet of course but salsa.debian.org is running > > GitLab and it seems like the likely Alioth replacement. > Do I need to create a new user account for

Re: How to start a new packaging team now?

On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Now that Alioth is beginning to close down and its replacement is not > > yet ready, how would I start this team now? > > What is the status of this migration ? which solution was selected ? For mailinglists? None. Currently no one is

Re: Single Sign On for Debian

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:05:32AM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > Le 23/08/2017 à 08:46, Alexander Wirt a écrit : > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Philip Hands wrote: > > > > > >> Michael Lustfield <mich...@lustfield.ne

Re: Project and User creation is now disabled on alioth.d.o

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 08/22/2017 08:13 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > as alioth is deprecated and will (more or less) get replaced with other > > services soon I disabled user creation and project creation on alioth. > > while I fully under

Accepted icinga2 2.7.0-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.7.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Re: Single Sign On for Debian

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Philip Hands wrote: > Michael Lustfield writes: > > ... > > Using Gitlab (or any VCS) as the user db for guest accounts means adding a > > dependency that could block future upgrades... kinda like now. This is not a > > future-proof design and will

Re: Single Sign On for Debian

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Mathieu Parent wrote: > Hello, > > Le mardi 22 août 2017, Luca Filipozzi <lfili...@debian.org> a écrit : > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:35:59PM -0700, Raoul Snyman wrote: > >> On 2017-08-21 5:48, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> > >

Re: Single Sign On for Debian

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 17-08-21 11:18:05, Enrico Zini wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 04:28:05PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > > > > > As expressed during the DC17 DSA and Cloud BoFs, I'm in favour of two > > > related but orthogonal things: > > > 1 collapsing user

Re: salsa.debian.net

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > On 2017-08-21 07:03:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > It looks this is the new collaboration server in replacement to > > alioth: https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa . > > Just to be clear is salsa.d.o (with gitlab) replacing alioth? I thought that >

Re: what's the latest on the update of moving from alioth to pagure.

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:59:14AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, shirish ??? wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > While I love and loved alioth, I know for probably new

Re: what's the latest on the update of moving from alioth to pagure.

re discussed. I was also able to > converse with Alexander Wirt and download the survey which wasn't > available anymore for public consumption. > > Can somebody tell/share which forge are the developers looking forward > to replace alioth with, pagure or something else . > &g

Accepted ferm 2.4-1 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:52:19 +0200 Source: ferm Binary: ferm Architecture: source all Version: 2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <al

Re: alioth replacement survey

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:49:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > Is it po

Re: alioth replacement survey

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi, > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:49:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Is it possible to share a link to the survey results? I saw it when I > > > submitted > > > my entry,

alioth replacement survey

Hi, to get some idea about opinions and expectations for the alioth replacement I decided to create a survey. Please take part in it [1] if you are interested in it. If you need some background, I recommend to read the excellent LWN article [2] by anarcat first. Thanks for your help Alex [1]

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Our list setup is pretty special and I don't think we will ever be able to > > move to something else (and there are not many alternatives. Mailman 3 is > > not

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 03:04:26PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On ഞായര്‍ 14 മെയ് 2017 02:46 വൈകു, Yao Wei wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Are there a discussion list of people working on the issue? I'd like to > > > follow and see if there's any I

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: Hi, > > I am worried about the status of FusionForge (and thus the development > > workflow > > around Alioth) for Debian. > > > > Recently I had a discussion on #alioth @OFTC asking for the possibility or > >

Re: lists.alioth.debian.org WAS moving away from FusionForge on Alioth

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Nice to have: >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Mon, 15 May 2017, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Nice to have: > (snip) > > - Mailinglists > > I've always thought it a bit weird, unfortunate (and possibly a historical > accident) >

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

On Sun, 14 May 2017, Boyuan Yang wrote: Hi, > I am worried about the status of FusionForge (and thus the development > workflow > around Alioth) for Debian. > > Recently I had a discussion on #alioth @OFTC asking for the possibility or > plan of upgrading alioth.debian.org from Wheezy to

Accepted icinga2 2.6.3-1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.3-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Re: SPAM

On Sun, 05 Mar 2017, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On March 5, 2017 3:08:49 PM EST, Vincent Danjean wrote: > >Le 05/03/2017 à 16:29, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > >> That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some > >> extra DNS records. And DMARC then

Accepted icinga2 2.6.2-1~exp1 (source amd64 all) into experimental

amd64 all Version: 2.6.2-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <alexander.w...@credativ.de> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:20:30PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Would a mirror of the git repository on alioth be sufficient? I had > > planned to set that up, but didn’t get around to it yet. Any help with > > that would be very welcome. > >

Re: Git hosting for code that provides Debian services

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:16:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On തിങ്കള്‍ 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > > Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the > > > company? > > > > > > > git.fosscommunity.in

Re: What is exactly the "canonical URI" for Vcs-{Git,Browser}?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Roger Shimizu (2017-01-20 14:40:06) > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 在 2017年1月20日星期五 SGT 下午12:45:53，Sebastiaan Couwenberg 写道： > > >> On 01/20/2017 11:56 AM, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > >> > # This

Accepted icinga2 2.6.0-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.6.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Re: fine-grained permissions on alioth git repositories? (aka Debian gitlab)?

On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > did we get anywhere with the gitlab discussion? The PHP packaging group > has grown quite big and I would really appreciate if we can get a > fine-grained permissions on packaging repositories. > > At minimum, there's split between main PHP,

Accepted keepalived 1:1.3.2-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 22:25:31 +0100 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.3.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Accepted nsca-ng 1.5-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:57:17 +0100 Source: nsca-ng Binary: nsca-ng-client nsca-ng-server Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> C

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-3 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted keepalived 1:1.2.24-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:20:39 +0100 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.2.24-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Re: client-side signature checking of Debian archives (Re: When should we https our mirrors?)

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: client-side signature checking of Debian archives > (Re: When should we https our mirrors?)"): > > snake oil > > snake oil > > The phrase "snake oil" is very insulting. I have asked you several > times to to stop. > > Publicly

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-2 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.5.4-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.5.3-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga2-bin - host

Accepted icinga2 2.5.1-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable

amd64 all Version: 2.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group <pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <alexander.w...@credativ.de> Description: icinga2- host and network monitoring system icinga

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, gustavo panizzo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > > controversial alternative pagure. > > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving > towards something

Accepted keepalived 1:1.2.23-1 (source amd64) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:12:06 +0200 Source: keepalived Binary: keepalived Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.2.23-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Alexande

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Thu, 07 Jul 2016, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > > similarly to what we did in the etch days.

Re: Neomutt packages available

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for > > > Debian. Hints for

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [adding gitlab folks in cc] > > On Saturday 11 June 2016 02:16 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > >> Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> writes: > >&g

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >