Am 29.02.20 um 16:33 schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Until now, I mostly avoided writing .symbols files for C++ shared libs.
Solve the problem, but let some maybe important informations pass through.
> But I am now. Thanks to all pkg-kde-tools hackers for the symbols
> helper. Much appreciated.
A maybe
Hi Otto,
i'm doing this for years now (LXQt)
To sum it up:
* there are no special rules, but i suggest to keep your hats strictly
separated
* if there are some doubts upstream - just think how you would feel with
a release with your downstream hat on
* if you release something upstream and have
Am 08.02.20 um 16:15 schrieb Svante Signell:
>
> Anything else?
>
Yes, you forget something - as long the discussion culture in Debian
stays this way i'm not motivated to start my NM process again. Waste of
time to join a bunch of unripe kids. Sorry, but i find no other words
with my limited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 15:39:49 +0100
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
featherpad (0.12.1-1) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 15:12:47 +0100
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 15:19:25 +0100
Source: feathernotes
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
feathernotes (0.5.1-1) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:40:18 +0100
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
featherpad (0.12.0-1) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 17:50:53 +0100
Source: feathernotes
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
feathernotes (0.5.0-1) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 17:56:19 +0100
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.0+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 14:05:00 +0100
Source: meteo-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
meteo-qt (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 19:38:07 +0100
Source: meteo-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
meteo-qt (1.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:35:13 +0100
Source: nextcloud-desktop
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ownCloud for Debian maintainers
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 942776
Changes
On 01.11.19 02:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
...the bigger question is: why systemd-sysusers is part of systemd, and
not a standalone thing, which we could make an essential package. If we
want it to be part of a package standard toolkit, it means systemd
becomes an essential package, which isn't
never wrote or decided we would. We just
> need to accept patches to add or fix sysv-rc scripts. What makes you
> think sysv-rc scripts are mandatory?
Good question - if these things are not mandatory nothing needs to
change.
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:28:10 +0100
Source: libqtxdg
Architecture: source
Version: 3.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
libqtxdg (3.4.0-1) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 00:04:08 +0200
Source: qtermwidget
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qtermwidget (0.14.1-2) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 16:38:15 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 939025 939382
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:52:39 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-12) unstable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alf Gaida
* Package name: lxqt-organizer
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : crispinalan
* URL : https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt-organizer
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : LXQt Pim, right now only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:30:09 +0200
Source: kpmcore
Architecture: source
Version: 4.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 942522 942528
Changes:
kpmcore (4.0.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:33:20 +0200
Source: lxqt-globalkeys
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 883035
Changes:
lxqt-globalkeys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 01:27:17 +0200
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12.1+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:34:49 +0200
Source: lxqt-globalkeys
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
lxqt-globalkeys (0.14.2-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 20:56:07 +0200
Source: qps
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qps (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
On 06.10.19 08:18, Attila Szalay wrote:
> That option means that the system will create not only the binary
> .amd.changes but another changes too which contains only the source
> packages. And I would like to use this method to be sure the package
> compiles, to be able to run the lintian
On 05.10.19 23:14, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:
>>>> that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read
>>>> the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages?
>>&g
On 05.10.19 21:48, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:06:56PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:
>> that is miss something - my point is: Why do you invoke pbuilder (read
>> the same question about sbuild too) to create pure source packages?
> To make sure they bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 19:47:28 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 939382
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-12
On 05.10.19 19:48, Attila Szalay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggling with it for a while now and I couldn't find the
> solution. I have a package maintained with git-buildpackage. And now,
> that I "cannot" upload binary packages I tried to compile the new
> version with the option to create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:56:09 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-11) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 12:41:07 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-11) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 01:08:50 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-10) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 19:39:14 +0200
Source: nm-tray
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 941648
Changes:
nm-tray (0.4.3-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:12:56 +0200
Source: nextcloud-desktop
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ownCloud for Debian maintainers
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 941577
Changes
Sorry Gary,
i just make a mistake - you can't relicense MIT(X11) stuff - it would
work only with some BSD files. You could modify the license (just as in
ncurses) and be done with - i would like to recommend not to do so.
Cheers
Alf
Plain no. If they are really interested they would know that they can
use every MIT part under GPL because of license compatibilty. Things
change dramatically if you would consider to change the licenses of the
files - if one would contribute to your now forked files the original
project would
On 15.09.19 00:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We have more agreement here, although there are a lot of details hidden in
> what "forcing" really means. But there's a huge space between "don't
> force other people to use non-free software to contribute to Debian" and
> "forbid using non-free
ut - with
every contributor who will left debian alone after me. Promised.
Before there are false assumtions that i'm searching any consensus in
this unbelivable bullshit - no - i don't. I'll only stepping aside
and see debian and debians ideas die. An cry silently. Thats all.
Alf
--
Alf Gaida
firmware and processor patches they need)
Cheers Alf
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
On 13.09.19 17:55, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There seems to be an obvious ordering issue here, namely that it's very
> weird to insist on the first (which has been the topic of this thread)
> before we insist on the second.
I wouldn't see it as an ordering issue - my POV is that each of these
On 13.09.19 15:10, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 02:51:47PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:
>
>> Is it really so hard to understand? Github, Gitlab and other service are
>> just tools. I don't care if they are free or non-free.
> For Debian, free so
On 9/13/19 10:18 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:34:42PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:
>> Regarding the workflow and participation - it might be a problem that
>> one need an account for github or other non-free services - it's easy:
> You also need accounts f
rop the whole LXQt from debian, we will continue to
use github.com in near future and are not planning a change right now.
Cheers Alf
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
i will migrate them if really needed because it is no
fun to do so - so it depends on Debian - but i'm dead without both
projects, so i'm in fact prepared, only to lazy to do it now.
> thanks,
> Ian.
>
Cheers Alf
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alf Gaida
* Package name: lxqt-kcm-integration
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Alf Gaida
* URL : https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt-kcm-integration
* License : (LGPL2+)
Programming Lang: (desktop files)
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 19:01:41 +0200
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
featherpad (0.11.1-2) unstable
Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> However, there's still a way too much web interaction with it, compared
> to what we do with a simple "git review" with gerrit.
Not we - you. Please don't expect that people have the same opinion. I like any
kind of nice
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Description:
featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 plain-text editor
featherpad-l10n - Language package for featherpad
Closes: 910769
Changes:
featherpad (0.11.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Cherry-picked upstream release V0.11.1.
* Added build dependency libhunspell-dev
gelog functionality, this will
come later. And with right written commits it should work well with the
Debian BTS - so best of both worlds.
Cheers
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
- i had no
problem with the 30 y.o. things and pull requests - there was no SCM
involved.
--
Alf Gaida
BDBF C688 EFAD BA89 5A9F 464B CD28 0A0B 4D72 827C
Am Dienstag, den 27.08.2019, 19:18 +0200 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> New stuff is always better. Go Electron!
>
Like it or not - the idea of pull requests (Github) or merge requests (Gitlab)
isn't exactly new. It might surprise you that people outside of debian are used
to use it a lot. Anyways,
lsa, it seems to me that using merge requests is
common sense and should not need any mention. Otherwise - if one is
happy to send patches via BTS - why not, as long one don't bother me
with. And this it a two way thing - i will not bother other people with
patches via BTS (nicer for: if not in salsa,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 00:53:45 +0200
Source: meteo-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
meteo-qt (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
-By: Alf Gaida
Description:
libquazip-doc - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP (documentation)
libquazip5-1 - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP
libquazip5-dev - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP (development files)
Changes:
libquazip (0.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Expected to pass new queue due to name change
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Description:
libquazip-doc - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP (documentation)
libquazip5-1 - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP
libquazip5-dev - C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP (development files)
Closes: 875026
Changes:
libquazip (0.7.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Alf Gaida ]
* Switched
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 01:24:54 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 925687
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:00:08 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 925742
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:40:57 +0200
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.2+repack-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 23:25:48 +0200
Source: nm-tray
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
nm-tray (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency
On 09.08.19 12:06, Ansgar wrote:
>
> Having sysvinit might make things a bit easier for Hurd/kFreeBSD, but
> it's not an absolute requirement for such a port to exist.
>
> Ansgar
>
Thanks Ansgar, this is the user deep in me - i like things to easy as
possible. More verbose: I will apply all
On 09.08.19 15:51, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>
> FWIW (I mean it, this is just anecdotical evidence): I have been
> recently upgrading a lot of containers and host and I have been unable
> to make lxc guest with systemd inits even start.
>
> Also, I have been having problems with ssh sessions taking
t it
goes out of my way most of the time - on desktop and servers. And i'm
an old fart, so i know the time before systemd well - to be honest, if
someone would turn back time i would abandon Linux and go back to some
sane system like Windows. I just don't want one minute on sysv anymore.
In Linux it is d
On 07.08.19 19:00, Marc Haber wrote:
> Marc, who is trying to have neutral view on systemd and has managed to
> be seen as a fanboi by systemd haters and as a hater by the systemd
> community, and now fully expects the CoC to be used to be silenced
Marc, i don't hope so - you are not alone.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 04:07:48 +0200
Source: lxqt-config
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 96
Changes:
lxqt-config (0.14.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 22:59:58 +0200
Source: liblxqt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
liblxqt (0.14.1-4) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 14:43:27 +0200
Source: liblxqt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
liblxqt (0.14.1-3) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 14:20:35 +0200
Source: liblxqt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
liblxqt (0.14.1-2) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 22:12:02 +0200
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
featherpad (0.10.0-3) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:10:06 +0200
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.1+repack-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 22:00:21 +0200
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
featherpad (0.10.0-2) unstable
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The main difficulty now with getting dgit push adopted is that
> maintainers don't see the benefit *to themselves* and it is always
> harder to get someone to see a benefit *to someone else*.
Ok, that describe me. I see benefits in an
It will confuse me because in 2021 I will expect release 2021 .
Furthermore, will .7 stand for July ?
I assume it's about point releases (which, again, Ubuntu doesn't do
AFAIK).
The keyword will be education - i wrote some times ago: Let people use
wht they are happy with - it will take a blog
Only a last thought: Didn't we have really important problems to solve?
It might be only me, but i see the discussion as a minor variation of
bike shedding.
To sum it up: Some people like codenames, some not, same for numbers -
the real question is: Does it really matters?
Over and out
Alf
On 25.06.19 17:48, Michael Stone wrote:
oldoldstable has the value of demonstrating some of what's wrong with
the current system
Can you please explain, i don't get it - maybe i to new at this. For me
file like /etc/apt/sources.lists.d/debian.list:
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
Only a few remarks as former simple user and now maintainer:
* Please don't mix things: release names has a value, distribution names
like oldoldstable, oldstable, stable, testing, unstable has their value too
* the value is that they never change - they are convenient. Especially
if one use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 16:39:11 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 926803
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-9
> A guest account in Debian LDAP does not get a Salsa account, at least
> not an usable one. Currently only users in the Debian group are
> allowed.Hmm - so salsa is useless at all - i don't think so. Change
your pov and see it otherwise: A guest can open a project - all members
of the Debian
I think such a GR would be a collosal waste of time. This issue is
not important enough. In particular, because the consensus is *not*
GR's can be man made a collosal waste of time.
Well, a GR can be quick and it would help to know where people stand
instead of having a few vocal people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 01:35:58 +0200
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.1+repack-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 01:07:12 +0200
Source: featherpad
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 927403
Changes:
featherpad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:56:39 +0200
Source: lxqt-sudo
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 928941
Changes:
lxqt-sudo (0.14.1-2
On 13.05.19 15:39, Holger Levsen wrote:
Maybe we could also make the "should" stronger:
- new packages (except if they are ment to become build-depends of
debhelper)*must* either use dh or cdbs.
- old packages should be switched to dh (or cdbs).
And then turn this "should" into a "must"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 01:41:32 +0200
Source: pcmanfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
pcmanfm-qt (0.14.1-3) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 20:38:43 +0200
Source: pcmanfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 928818
Changes:
pcmanfm-qt (0.14.1-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 15:30:08 +0200
Source: lxqt-session
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 928804
Changes:
lxqt-session
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 17:57:01 +0200
Source: libqtxdg
Architecture: source
Version: 3.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 928721
Changes:
libqtxdg (3.3.1-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 20:01:18 +0200
Source: connman
Architecture: source
Version: 1.37+repack-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alexander Sack
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
connman (1.37+repack-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 01:11:39 +0200
Source: qt5-style-kvantum
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.0+repack-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
qt5-style-kvantum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:40:25 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-8) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 23:25:45 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 927708
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:05:04 +0200
Source: lxqt-qtplugin
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 927905
Changes:
lxqt-qtplugin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:50:23 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 927707
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:52:30 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-5) unstable; urgency
On 13.04.19 15:07, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:59:19PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native).
What's the point/advantage of native packages?
No need to make a separate orig tarball.
Can't agree more, there are places where 3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:03:43 +0200
Source: libfm-qt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.14.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LXQt Packaging Team
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 926626
Changes:
libfm-qt (0.14.1-4
DUR is fine, DPA is fine PPA is not - as it is used before in a totally
different context.
The idea just to require git is really nice, putting all the things into
a single file is not. Not even Arch does it. (patches, install, config
...) - so the default debian dir should be enough.
On 07.04.19 17:40, gregor herrmann wrote:
I'm one of those people.
And I still don't know what "an AUR-like service" is, or what
"packaging scripts" are.
After reading the intro at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository I guess,
translated to Debian terms, we are talking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 14:37:07 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-8) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:13:27 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Closes: 910330
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 23:39:43 +0200
Source: fswatch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0+repack-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alf Gaida
Changed-By: Alf Gaida
Changes:
fswatch (1.14.0+repack-6) unstable
1 - 100 of 898 matches
Mail list logo
