I don't know why you're asking me; I've already said that I would consider
this configuration acceptable for a release architecture, but that I
wouldn't recommend it to the Sparc porters.
What do you mean wouldn't recommend it to the sparc porters? And what
does your recommendation count for
It's also not something that would totally destroy an architecture's
ability to release. Yes, it would be bad, but not the end of the world.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:36:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think they are designed too stringently
For sparc, a second buildd was brought on-line on auric this year because
(IIRC) vore was not keeping up with the upload volume at the time; this
required effort on DSA's part to clear enough disk space to be able to run a
buildd, until which time sparc was holding some RC bugfixes out of
handle these kinds of things?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:31:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:32:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:11:39PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The requirement
recall some
(m68k) having problems simply because of lack of processing power.
The guidelines are aimed at the wrong thing is my point.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:23:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does everyone have a sudden interest
Vore isn't down.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 03:25]:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars
Read my previous replies.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 10:54]:
Ah, so why is vore down now for some time now? If it's so easy to
that should read as auric of course.
Cheers,
Andi
--
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I
haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet.
That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two are
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:11:39PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can
have two to replace it within a day or two.
The point being, there's no reason to have two seperate
herrings, and just get back to work. Sparc has always
been and always will be a maintained architecture.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:17:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I can guarantee that it never dies. The hardrives are raid 5
configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:06:46 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
As I understand it, the plan was to convert auric into a buildd but
the RAID needs to be fixed. Ben Collins was looking into this but I
don't know about the status. I've also heard discussions several
months ago about using one of Ben's really fast machines.
This is based on what I've
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:04:42AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our new
sparc developers. I can't pay to ship them, but if Debian foots the bill,
I'll get them to the right ppl.
I'd
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:10:49PM +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
* Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 11:04]:
Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our new
sparc developers. I can't pay to ship them, but if Debian foots the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:17:54AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 11:04]:
Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our
new
sparc developers. I
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:20:07AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We can move services to supported architectures, but there is of
course one major problem: DSA is only willing to host stable .d.o
boxes but if many architectures don't have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:35:40 -0400
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:11:48 -0400
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:58:53 -0400
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:23:18 -0500
Source: silo-installer
Binary: silo-installer
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 0.0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:12:46 -0500
Source: sxid
Binary: sxid
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 4.0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32 - Linux kernel binary image for sun4c, sun4m and sun4d.
kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32-smp - Linux kernel binary image for SMP sun4m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:18:24 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:31:04 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:34:01 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:09:59 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:24:28 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:13:53 -0500
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
This problem has already bitten several skilled Debian developers at various
times. Given the problems that are caused for such skilled people as a
result of this I hate to imagine the consequences for typical users!
But typical users wont be building custom kernels with ACL patches, will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:51:36 -0500
Source: sparc-utils
Binary: sparc-utils
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.9-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Delaunay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 05:42:22PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
Could someone tell me which package uses jam instead make for building?
I am trying to package netpanzer and it uses jam...
I'd like to see any examples how to connect debian/rules with jam.
I hope there are
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:51:14PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
Hi!
I am asking your advice per policy section 10.9. [*]
/etc/zorp is mode 0700 in upstream. In a typical setup, almost
every single file under this directory contains sensitive information:
firewall rules, cryptographic
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
(I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
which Debian does have available.
I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot. It
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Thanks, you saved me from reading
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi folks,
as of the latest update of libssl0.9.7 the postinst is able to restart
certain services which use the ssl or crypto library, so that they don't
use the faulty libraries any longer. I used part of the code from
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi folks,
as of the latest update of libssl0.9.7 the postinst is able to restart
certain services which use the ssl or crypto library, so that they don't
use the faulty libraries any longer. I used part of the code from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:48:07 -0400
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:33:52 -0400
Source: libraw1394
Binary: libraw1394-5 libraw1394-dev
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 0.10.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins
__u8 short slot_tablelen;
Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
can't be both, right?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ide-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb)
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IEEE1394 drivers (udeb)
kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc - Kernel header files for all sparc sub architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:59:38 -0400
Source: silo
Binary: silo
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:36:16 -0400
Source: sxid
Binary: sxid
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 4.0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ide-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb)
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IEEE1394 drivers (udeb)
kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc - Kernel header files for all sparc sub architectures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 20:39:39 -0400
Source: libraw1394
Binary: libraw1394-5 libraw1394-dev
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 0.10.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
a couple weeks/months now.
A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
verification thereof. Uses and included module for GnuPG file
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
a couple weeks/months now.
A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
verification thereof. Uses and included module for GnuPG file
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
is pretty trivial but still requires some ugly architecture specific
hacks in each
: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ide-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb)
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IEEE1394 drivers (udeb)
kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc - Kernel header files for all sparc sub architectures
: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ide-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb)
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IEEE1394 drivers (udeb)
kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc - Kernel header files for all sparc sub architectures
-smp kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc32
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc
kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 ppp-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb
Architecture: source sparc all
Version: 29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben
]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
chill - The GNU CHILL compiler.
cpp- The GNU C preprocessor.
g++- The GNU C++ compiler.
g77- The GNU Fortran 77 compiler.
gcc- The GNU C compiler.
gcj- The GNU Java compiler.
gij- The GNU
kernel-headers-2.4.21-sparc
kernel-image-2.4.21-sun4u-smp
Architecture: source sparc all
Version: 28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ieee1394-modules-2.4.21-sparc64-udeb - IDE drivers (udeb
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
cpp-3.2- The GNU C preprocessor
cpp-3.2-doc - Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
g++-3.2- The GNU C++ compiler
g77-3.2- The GNU Fortran 77 compiler
g77-3.2-doc
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:29:42PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
I intend to package the xplot utility from xplot.org. This tool is
useful with the tcptrace package, which I maintain. However, there's
already an xplot package that installs /usr/bin/xplot. It's not
compatible with xplot.org,
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:17:05PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi to all!
Kernel 2.6 is to be released soon (hopefully), thus I tried to compile
2.5.69 on sparc64 recently. For those not knowing this arch: kernel is
64 bit, userland is 32 bit, thus you need a cross-compiler with host
sparc32
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:25:03PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:15, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Because in Debian there is a few people with high load in debian,
and many with less load. People with high load are more likely to
burn out and disappear. It is thus
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I just ran some stats on my APT sources (mostly Woody), and discovered
that the distribution of number of packages per developer is very
uneven. This is the histogram of developers with the specific number
of packages they
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:23:51AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
En r?ponse ? Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alioth seems to be down, pings seems to stop at gatekeeper.terena.nl
...
Was this expected?
Yes, and no.
No, because it is a connection failure.
Yes, because the
That behavior always struck me as fairly evil -- it's never fun when one
single bit flip can take down a system, and I'd like to see the number
of bits that can do so be as small as possible. Now that you point out
the actual code I wish we could do away with that check. Does it really
buy
What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
If we're doing let's have a conf where we normally don't how about we
have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
nothern Virginia are myself.
Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if
==
PROPOSAL
__
Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying:
On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
that anyone who had been
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:13:08PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On pe, 2003-04-25 at 11:09, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
They just don't support i386 anymore.
http://www.suse.de/en/private/products/suse_linux/i386/system_requirements.html
http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/technical/
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:07:03PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
Please explain your reasons for removing the credits and attributions
from the reiserfs utilities in violation of our copyright.
You'll note that ReiserFS anticipated the GNU GPL V3 by including
clauses that forbid removal of
all that was removed was *code* that gets compiled. If the maintainer
cannot arbitrarily change any code he wants, then it is not clear that
the program is DFSG-free.
Amen. Making part of the code immutable is not what I call free
software. What if I want to use parts of the code and I
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:24:21PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Now I hope you stop with your trolling and consider speaking
respectfully to us. I am pretty sure that if you emailed the maintainer
of the package and pointed out the facts to him, he would revert the
change.
Dude,
You
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 11:13:59PM +0200, Anders Widman wrote:
all that was removed was *code* that gets compiled. If the maintainer
cannot arbitrarily change any code he wants, then it is not clear that
the program is DFSG-free.
Amen. Making part of the code immutable is not what I
1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
given table above).
2/we want one of the following:-
A/ to be able to insert a floppy disk into
our a drive , turn on the computer,
the computer
But I do have a cursor font, even though I don't have xfonts-gimpers 1.8
installed (it refuses to install anyway). But I do have xfonts-artwiz
installed. I purged xfonts-gimpers from my system and now X has a brain
tumor. This is a critical bug and should have been fixed by now.
apt-get
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:50:22AM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote:
According to Junichi's manual they should be in -dev packages (that
makes sense, since they are only used by libtool builds).
Yes, it's a bug. Consider that the .la file is usually without soname
(e.g. libfoo.la) it will clash when
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
the primary runtime.
ltdl needs them at runtime.
Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:01:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a
message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought
about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the
time, didn't see a
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
Hi! (it's my first post here)
Fucking idiot. Yes, I can say that now. I'll only be DPL for another ~20
hours. Here, let me say it again. Fucking idiot.
Man that felt good.
Ben (not the DPL for much longer) Collins
--
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:44:36PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:27:04PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
This problem is very common for non-free software.
... which really doesn't seem all that relevant apart from sounding
good; hell, the change in nice()'s return value appears to be a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:43:32PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
...to bring in other fixes that aren't so easy to seperate from smaller
ones.
Lose the tone, it wont get you what you want. Nice is being fixed. I've
said this in several of the bug
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
It's because of this that I continue to feel that kernel interfaces are
best defined by the kernel.
If the kernel headers aren't an interface, why do they exist? There
appears to be a very large philosophical gulf here.
What we really should have is a nice low-level C library that encapsulates
such things and lets anyone use it...
All we really need is a master ioctl header that defines the numbers. It
would be Debian specific, but what the hell.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 -
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 23:17, Ben Collins wrote:
Looking at my testing PPC box with grep-available, we have only about
8GB total Installed-Size.
glibc packages total installed size is only a few dozen megs. However
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:30:03PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
That's all of three 100GB IDE disks running in RAID 0. Four disks if for
some reason you want redundancy on your cache.
Surely you don't presume that a) All of our autobuilders have enough
bays for 3 IDE disks and b)
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:48:49AM +0200, Paul Russell wrote:
On Monday 01 April 2002 18:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
The same package: almost never
the same file: often, with every new compile.
Just take into account that a
in Debian
packages! IOW, remove the -mcpu=ultrasparc line. It is not fully
supported in gcc, and not to mention that if it did work, it would break
the package on sparc32 platforms.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins
is that it creates a rootfs (I believe) and copies
/sbin/lilo blindly to the new rootfs. Thus, you just have a broken shell
script.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL
. When can we expect shipment?
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Ben is merely behind with updating the BTS, by the looks of it...
Can't close it till I fix woody/sid too. Which will be when 2.2.5 is
released (days).
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
on it. That's the whole reason for having them there.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:15:07PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
binary of the newest package of each build dep available in unstable
before building the package. If that is not the case I would have to
depend on at least
doubt that everything in
2.0.18's API works with 2.0.14.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:01:25AM +, Adam Olsen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 10:49:33PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But quake2-engine does not depend on anything
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:32:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that's rediculous. Education is not a smokescreen, and you can't
argue that there will never be free data available for quake2 (or know
for sure that there isn't already
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:45:14PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
But you do agree that it requires having *some* data, no matter what
game it's for? Which means having a Depends: quake2-data?
And if you wish to argue
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:50:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that's rediculous. Education is not a smokescreen, and you can't
argue that there will never be free data available for quake2 (or know
for sure that there isn't already
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I'm going to upload libgaming. Nothing yet has been created for it,
but it is possible. Should I upload it to contrib?
Can you give me an example of *anything* you think
for it
(else we'll have to start judging script interpreters and libraries the
same way).
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 04:08:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I'm going to upload libgaming. Nothing yet has been
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But quake2-engine does not depend on anything to fulfill it's purpose.
It is a gaming engine, not a game. This is the same logic that applies
to libraries and interpreters.
Huh
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:56:26PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The purpose of the sources released is a gaming engine. They did not
release quale2 the game, which is what the data files consist of.
Notice that lots of games from Id are based
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 08:08:56PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Second, your example seems totally fabricated. If there were a
plausible enterprise--ANYONE--who was seriously planning on using this
engine to make free levels that don't
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
