Hi,
I've so far maintained the package pinfo, an alternative info-file
viewer. The last release has been some time ago and there are also some
open bug reports. I've talked with the author about the package and he
decided that he has no longer time to work on this package. Therefor the
program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:21:06 +0100
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:58:03 +0200
Source: pinfo
Binary: pinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:48:38 +0200
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0200
Source: tinycdb
Binary: tinycdb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.74-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:26:11 +0200
Source: slidentd
Binary: slidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:34:03 +0100
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:18:34 +0100
Source: fbgetty
Binary: fbgetty
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.698-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL
Hi James,
first let me thank you for your good work so far on the recovery of the
debian machines. I just wanted to add one note:
On [05/12/03 1:51], James Troup wrote:
Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to
use something like dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:17:09 +0100
Source: john
Binary: john
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:19:48 +0200
Source: fbgetty
Binary: fbgetty
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.698-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:51:09 +0200
Source: pinfo
Binary: pinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:00:21 +0200
Source: slidentd
Binary: slidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.19-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:09:06 +0200
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:20:21 +0200
Source: slidentd
Binary: slidentd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.19-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:18:50 +0200
Source: libowfat
Binary: libowfat-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:52:18 +0100
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:54:08 +0100
Source: pinfo
Binary: pinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:36:59 +0100
Source: tinycdb
Binary: tinycdb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.73-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 16:39:27 +0100
Source: dput
Binary: dput
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.2.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tinycdb
Version : 0.73
Upstream Author : Michael J. Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : ftp://ftp.corpit.ru/pub/tinycdb
* License : Public Domain [1]
Description : a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:17:02 +0100
Source: libowfat
Binary: libowfat-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Kurz [EMAIL
reassign 129025 exim
thanks
On 13/01/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: general
Version: 20020113
Severity: important
You are reporting a problem with the mail server software exim and so
this bug should reported against the package exim and not general.
in
On 25/12/01, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:36:52AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
If so, then maybe you should have a look at fungetty, a
replacement for the standard Linux getty that can display
full-color graphics above the login
Damn, I didn't want to post here anymore, but looks like I need to add
some points. :-(
On 26/12/01, Brian Wolfe wrote:
Heh, I was not aware that a non-developer could subscribe to d-d.
Looking at http://lists.debian.org and reading the list description
would have told you that before.
So, that's hopefully my last post for quite a long time.
On 26/12/01, David D. W. Downey wrote:
* Pierfrancesco Caci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
1) learn how to properly format a mail message (i.e. fold at 75th
column)
Quit pickin at the measly stuff and pay attention to the content of
On 01-09-25 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-09-24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
Hm, that doesn't make much sense too me. I think the best thing would be
to have /etc/bind inside
On 01-09-25 Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On Sep/25/2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
Were exactly do we force them? Which debian packages do not work well
with a 2.0.x kernel?
I think that maybe he refers to the fact that, for example, you may
have formatted your ext2 partitions so
On 01-09-26 Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-09-25 Steve Greenland wrote:
I am so tired of hearing things like this. Nobody is forcing anyone to
do anything. We already force them to use 2.2 instead of still using
2.0. You want
On 01-09-26 Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On Sep/26/2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
I think that maybe he refers to the fact that, for example, you may
have formatted your ext2 partitions so they are incompatible with 2.0.x
Well, I once heared about this, but never read an explanation what
On 01-09-24 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
Hm, that doesn't make much sense too me. I think the best thing would be
to have /etc/bind inside $CHROOT and having no symlink.
And scratch the second-most important feature of Debian (the first one
On 01-09-25 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
And scratch the second-most important feature of Debian (the first one being
the DFSG)? Do Not Move Config Files Out Of /etc. Ever. If you need it
elsewhere, at least leave a symbolic link in place.
bind
On 01-09-25 Jochen Voss wrote:
there used to be a package called dput,
but now I cannot find it anymore. For example
visiting
http://packages.debian.org/dput
shows the message No responses to your query
and aptitude lists it as an obsolete package.
What happened to this package?
On 01-09-25 Steve Greenland wrote:
On 25-Sep-01, 03:12 (CDT), Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I wrote in two emails before, this isn't a solution, since this
forces an administrator to use kernel 2.4.x instead of maybe still using
2.2.x.
I am so tired of hearing things
On 01-09-25 Martin F Krafft wrote:
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:59:13PM +0200):
Hm, that doesn't make much sense too me. I think the best thing would be
to have /etc/bind inside $CHROOT and having no symlink.
except if you want to enable the usual /etc/bind/ editing
On 01-09-25 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 25-Sep-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
there used to be a package called dput,
but now I cannot find it anymore. For
On 01-09-25 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
No, dput doesn't depend on ssh, it only suggest it like rsync. But it
depends on GnuPG now, therefor the change.
why the depends on gpg?
Because the default behaviour of dput is to check the signatures on the
.dsc and the .changes file. So it won't be
On 01-09-23 Martin F Krafft wrote:
complicated for i did not know about the mount --bind option. sure,
this only works with 2.4.x, but if any chroot changes to bind9 are
going public, then this will be bundled with a 2.4.x kernel-image,
right? will testing be 2.4.x?
So you want to force
On 01-09-24 Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 24, Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
Yes, since managing a chroot environment without bind mounts
On 01-09-24 Martin F Krafft wrote:
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:31:54AM +0200):
So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
solution, since the decision which kernel
On 01-09-18 Joey Hess wrote:
It'd be nice if someone would look at optimizing it sometime; the
behavior I see with strace is absurd, and could easily be done with no
syscalls, at least, by just reading the whole trustdb into memory.
I know that the Werner revamped the whole keyring code about
On 01-09-06 Nick Phillips wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:47:26PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
upstream packages because they are not part of a package? The
translation of the error messages and other messages of a program belong
to the package of it.
That depends on whether
On 01-09-05 Nick Phillips wrote:
The translation of any part of a package, be it the text of error messages,
So, shall we now remove all .po files and other translation from
upstream packages because they are not part of a package? The
translation of the error messages and other messages of a
On 01-09-06 Nick Phillips wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:08:25PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-09-05 Nick Phillips wrote:
The translation of any part of a package, be it the text of error
messages,
So, shall we now remove all .po files and other translation from
upstream
On 01-09-04 Nick Phillips wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:06:04PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
I don't expect most maintainers to be able or inclined to keep track of
a shedload of different translations, and those who are that keen should
May I ask if you are aware about the ongoing
On 01-09-04 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Michael Bramer wrote:
Maybe I have on next WE more time and I can improve the server and
make this notification mail configable per package and someone can
remove his packages from the notification process.
You didn't already?
On 01-09-03 Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:16:31AM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Probably because you're supposed to use a gooey web browser to add
a printer... a bit much for a postinst script.
Not exactly. The way I read the docs you can use lpadmin from the
On 01-09-01 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Can you store multiple signitures in the same file?
Yes, that possible by using the OpenPGP format. You'll either need to
use one-pass-signature packets, like GnuPG does by default, or the
cleartext signed format.
Christian
--
Debian
On 01-09-01 Simon Richter wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
not be ascii armored since this would only introduce transmission overhead
and gain nothing. The file name for this file is constructed from the
Why does it gain nothing? What about problems during transmission
On 01-09-02 Michael Meskes wrote:
I wanted to install DeskJet_670C-cdj670.ppd or DeskJet_670C-pcl3.ppd from
cupsomatic-ppd but just got a
lpadmin: add-printer failed: The requested resource was not found on this
server.
Would you mind telling us which version of cups you have installed?
On 01-04-29 Joey Hess wrote:
Anyone have a clue?
Received: from myhostname.my.isp.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with
+ESMTP id f3QDlYZ2018784
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:47:34
+-0600
Suddenly here
On 01-04-30 Matthijs Melchior wrote:
Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-04-29 Joey Hess wrote:
Anyone have a clue?
Received: from myhostname.my.isp.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with
+ESMTP id f3QDlYZ2018784
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I ask why you don't mention that this is a web browser for Gnome?
This information would be helpful for people that look for a lightweight
HTML browser, but don't want to install Gnome. For those people
On 01-04-27 Jérôme Marant wrote:
Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarcasm
So come on people, let's install all 6000 packages, because maybe we
could use them once.
/Sarcasm
Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for
people willing to test it. Now
On 01-04-26 Jérôme Marant wrote:
However, I found a simple HTML browser called Encompass
that takes far less memory than those I mentioned. Of course,
it does not have all the feature these browsers can offer
but it does handle HTML pretty well. I've build debs you can
find there:
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 05:40:53PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs
On 01-01-07 Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
Damian M Gryski wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, Svante Signell wrote:
Is openssh ever going to be upgraded? Latest unstable version is
2.2.0p1-1.1 from September? while the latest OpenBSD release is now
2.3.0p1! Maybe the package also should
On 01-01-06 Goswin Brederlow wrote:
== Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
July 5-8 LinuxTag 2001, Stuttgart http://www.linuxtag.org/
http://www.infodrom.ffis.de/Debian/events/LinuxTag2001/
Already planed to be there.
I will be there any way, but I have to work out some
On 01-01-06 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Don't assume devfs! A lot of us uses it, but before our standard
kernel uses it our lilo package shouldn't assume it unless it
On 01-01-04 Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
Does anyone know where Loic has been lately (i.e., for the past two years
or so)? AFAIK his last package upload was in November 1998, and the mail
I sent him about whether he needs help with mailx has generated no reply.
Since mailx is important, if the
On 00-12-28 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Kurz wrote:
|dpkg-scriptlib -- dpkg-perl and dpkg-python (142 days old)
Is any package using functions of dpkg-perl or dpkg-python? If yes, I
think someone should take care of this packages and the bugs that are in
them
On 00-12-26 Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|silo (195 days old)
Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's
currently still listed in the wnpp but I could find it which apt-cache
search silo.
You can only
On 00-12-27 Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 06:59:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 03:22:21PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
|silo (195 days old)
Has this package been removed from unstable and if yes, why? It's
currently still listed
On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 01:29:44PM +, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:41:54 -0500, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
However, I would say that if the program dies so frequently that it needs a
wrapper like this, it should probably be
Hi,
we currently have a really huge list of packages that are orphaned and
so I looked at them to see if we can drop some of them. Here are some
suggestion and my comments. Any comment from you is appreciated:
|ppd-gs (1 year and 357 days old)
Do we really need this package still for users of
On 00-12-26 Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Today, Christian Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
-F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
logfile will be rotated, it will notice this and reopen the new
On 00-12-26 Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
Well, this is a feature that tail on FreeBSD has. If you start it with
-F, it will tail you the current file like our tail -f. But if know the
logfile will be rotated, it will notice
On 00-12-26 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 00-12-25 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It would be nice if less included a feature to close and reopen the
current
file. Then this would not be necessary.
Well, this is a feature
On 00-09-12 Daniel Kobras wrote:
On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
`scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
not even looked at it in over a
On 00-08-17 Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
AIDE:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide.html
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-cache show aide
|Package: aide
|Version: 0.7-6
|[...]
|Maintainer: Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
boxes:
http://www6.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~tsjensen/boxes/
|[EMAIL
On 00-03-26 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try
On 00-03-26 Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to
Hi,
as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to upload this package
till friday next week to woody.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian
On 99-09-23 Stijn de Bekker wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
I intent to orphan bvi and penguineyes. I will orphan bvi, because I
don't use it much anymore and penugineyes will get orphaned, because I
gave gnome I try, but I don't like it much and so I want to remove
of the packages over, feel free to do so.
Ciao
Christian
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer/QA-Team *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System *
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System for your PC *
[DONT SEND ME A CC!]
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
[You don't need to send me an extra Cc as I read the lists on which I
write. Thanks!]
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
Branden
Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 09:24:19PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
Well what is the problem with this? I don't see any offence in getting a
message that says that I (the maintainer) has still open bug over a
certain age. I think this is a good reminder
Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 11:48:25AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example: I've got an open old bug report that flying
(a X11 pool game) doesn't support 16/24 bit displays. The upstream
This would speak
to
with spamming instead these are person, which are interested in
improving th quality of the distribution.
Cheers
Christian
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer *
* Use Debian - a free
[You don't need to send me an extra Cc as I read the lists on which I
write. Thanks!]
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 03:32:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Brian Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 04:45:11PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
And what do you propose should be done with bugs that are so old? Still
let them stay open and look somewhere else? No, that isn't a solution.
The solution is to contact the developer
Brian Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 09:28:33PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
So where's the problem with getting an reminder about your old open
bugs, which you need to fix?
I don't NEED a reminder about my bugs. There should be an option to TURN THE
BLOODY
this message to the list.
Cheers
Christian
--
* Christian Kurz Debian Developer *
* Use Debian - a free Operating System for your PC *
84 matches
Mail list logo
