-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:13:54 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Arnaud Kyheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:59:02 +1000
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:53:43 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.2b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 00:08:49 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.2a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:31:51 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.2a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 13:31:49 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 11:07:02 +1000
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:11:01 +1000
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:14:41 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1d-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:51:07 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1d-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:22:02 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1d-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 21:14:04 +1000
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1d-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
busybox-cvs - Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer floppy images (udeb)
busybox-cvs-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:39:33 +1100
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:28:29 +1100
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:57:52 +1100
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
busybox-cvs - Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer floppy images (udeb)
busybox-cvs-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:38:53 +
Paul Hedderly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The inclusion of mdadm would at least enable people to go into a shell
and setup their MD devices. Then all you'd need to do is make sure
some basic MD options are on in the kernel.
I put together a raid patch for
On 18 Nov 2003 12:27:55 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Busybox or busybox-cvs?
The patch was against the head of busybox's cvs a couple of months ago,
which equates aproximately to busybox-cvs-1.0-pre3.
If the busybox-cvs maintainer isn't responsive contact upstream.
I
A program that is CPU bound will benefit from compiler optimisations.
Compiler optimisation wont make any noticable improvment on largely IO
bound applications.
I was deliberatly speaking generally because it is a grey area, there
are very few practical programs that are completely CPU bound or
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:39:00 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:44:20PM +, Anthraxz __ wrote:
^^^
If you don't have a proper From line, everybody will think you're a
dickhead.
Andrew, i think you
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:13:09 +0100
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does that mean? Gentoo uses a heavily patched kernel which goes
far beyound of what we dicuss
I was in a debian chroot under a gentoo system hence both tests used the
same kernel.
Its irrelevent, but the kernel is
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:39:24 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently you entirely fail to understand then, because that's not
what I said. Please refrain from commenting on issues in a language
which you cannot comprehend.
Yes your majesty.
There are none so blind as those
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 01:32:44 +0800
Cameron Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Glenn didn't really put many words around his output from timing
bzip2, so any claims about what he was trying to prove are
speculative.
The point i was trying to make is that architecture specific
optimisations
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please provide carefully documented evidence of the performance gains
that you are claiming, not handwaving. Evidence of a difference is not
the same thing; anybody who has any experience with low-level
programming
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
expect people to call bullshit on this.
Gentoo
# time bzip2 -9k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:14:09 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:41:14 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet-gtk gnunet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.0a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 13:56:55 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet-gtk gnunet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:41:50 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
Some comments
Source code is more important than binaries, that we should all agree
on.
Fixing bugs that such a project uncovers makes Free software more
robusts and is good for the community.
Source based distro's are more bandwidth friendly as the source can be
reused to produce new
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:58:10 +0200
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SPAM doesn't get better if done for a good thing.
(That doesn't stop me of writing letters to Members of European
Parliament e.g., but your mail is absolutly misdirected at d-d.)
Software patents do restrict what
The following is a list of packages whose names are inconsistent with
accepted behaviour (plz correct me if im wrong)
To my knowledge if a package is provided by multiple sources, then a
virtual package should be used.
Some packages only conflict on one architecture, im not sure if thats
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Glenn McGrath wrote:
The following is a list of packages whose names are inconsistent
with accepted behaviour (plz correct me if im wrong)
Sorry for my ignorance but which
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:03:43 -0600
Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the goal? To indicate that the e-mail signed came from
someone in possession of person X's private key. X's public key can
be put up on existing public key servers. There are already numerous
public key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 03:33:59 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5.0+cvs.20030822-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
Then go and read Henrique's excellent
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
I added the following to my rules file from his README and all is well.
# FOR AUTOCONF 2.52 AND NEWER ONLY
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
confflags += --build $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
else
Im having problems compiling libextractor on at least ia64 and m68k
On those arch's dpkg-buildpackage fails with
libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration
libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag'
In debian rules i am specifying host and build, so on ia64 configure is
called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 21:09:38 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5.0+cvs.20030822-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 21:57:27 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:21:48 +0100
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think you're going to get it, either. It's basically the same
question as Why do people write free software?, and if you come up
with altruism, politics, or respect then you're barking up the
wrong tree.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:33:24 +0100
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:21:42AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Membership is not about resources, its about community.
Bullshit. Our community consists of heckling each other until we get
it right.
This heckling
Debians greatest strength is in its community, that includes dd's and
non dd's.
If we are organised in such a way that we are alienating non dd's the we
are operating in a diminished state.
Debian is but a shadow of what it could be.
Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:27:29 +
Source: dmalloc
Binary: dmalloc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED
Is there a list of developer accessible machines anywhere ?
A mirror of http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi would have been handy
Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:59:20 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:06:49 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:30:07 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:02:20 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4a-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:01:16 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4a-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:26:32 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:04:54 +
Source: libextractor
Binary: extract libextractor0 libextractor0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:47:54 +
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:50:46 +1000
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
No, you don't. We've done the maths, incremental --ed style diffs are
the way to do this: they make for by far the smallest download, and
minimal archive bloat.
ed style diffs can be a problem in that the same diff
If we put the Packages file under some sort of version control (e.g.
cvs), bandwidth requirments would be minimised as cvs automatically
takes care of diff's and patching, and i assume the CPU load from cvs
server is a lot better than rsync.
Glenn
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action.
What you say is
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:28:51 +0900
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wild guess is that the build script is setting prefix rather
than DESTDIR ?
You are correct, i should know better than to make such basic mistakes.
Thanks
Glenn
Im preparing a package of GNUnet (#147380), one of its current problems
is that it generates a heap of lintian rpath warnings, e.g.
W: gnunet-gtk: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/gnunet-gtk
/home/bug1/0.5.3/gnunet-0.5.3/debian/tmp/usr/lib
./configure and the Makefile.in's mention
What if the full statment was shown once on installation, but not every
time the program is used, would that be an acceptable compromise to you ?
Glenn
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:07:03 +0400
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll note that ReiserFS anticipated the GNU GPL V3 by including
clauses that forbid removal of credits in its license, and for a long
time I have been telling Stallman that he needs to get V3 of the GPL
out the door.
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:13:59 +0200
Anders Widman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow.. what an reaction :). Hans's original message was that the
credits were not included with the distributed files, nothing else.
Or am I completely mistaken?
I interpret his original message as saying his
System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
busybox-cvs - Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
busybox-cvs-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons of builtin utilities
busybox-cvs-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer (udeb)
Closes
System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
busybox-cvs - Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
busybox-cvs-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons of builtin utilities
busybox-cvs-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer (udeb)
Changes
System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
busybox-cvs - Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
busybox-cvs-static - Standalone rescue shell with tons of builtin utilities
busybox-cvs-udeb - Tiny utilities for the debian-installer (udeb)
Changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:37:01 +1100
Source: dmalloc
Binary: dmalloc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.8.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:16:20 +0100
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a library in Debian that provides reliable stream based
communication over UDP?
I want to be able to deal with asymetric links and end-points that
change IP address so TCP won't work. Surely someone must
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:03:58 +0100
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Your idea here.
Trinity, re the Matrix
Glenn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:28:18 +1100
Source: dmalloc
Binary: dmalloc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.8.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:34:48 -0500 (CDT)
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, it was written:
Hello world,
In a couple of days uncompressed Packages files for unstable will
cease to be generated, and bzip2'ed Packages files will be generated
in their place
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:45:35 -0400
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everybody,
release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
On 06 Apr 2002 19:45:29 -0500
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 06:37, Glenn McGrath wrote:
An idea that i havent heard mentioned here is to create a
client/server application for specifically handling our metadata, the
server can be queried by clients to send
(picked up from http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=633)
The scalability problems of the Packages file is a recognised problem that
has been discused many times on this list, i think the following idea
could go a long way to solving it.
The current method of checking for updates is to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:15:02 -0600
Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, if upstream is using libtool, then they should use the
libtool's specification for shared libraries. Then you just have
libtar and libtar-dev packages.
No, unstream isnt using libtool, upstream only produces static
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:19:13 -0800
Yves Arrouye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
e.g. The definition of the age field in -version-info
current:revision:age
age
The difference between the newest and oldest interfaces that this
library implements. In other words, the library implements all
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:39:52 +0900
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it called libtar1 when it provides libtar.so-1.2 ?
Also you only have -release 1.2 as the LDFLAGS option.
There is no soname ? How about specifying -version-info ?
I would drop the -release, and use
The ITP is in the BTS as #128042
libtar is available from http://www-dev.cso.uiuc.edu/libtar/ its under
the original 4 clause BSD license
My understanding is that it is DFSG free and conforms to Brandons
proposed policy changes as outlined
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:38:44 +0100
Nicolas Chauvat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyhow, my pet project for tonight was to write such a graph checker.
I (and others i know of) have thought about this problem, it is an
intersting problem, i dont think anybody has come up with a good
solution yet.
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 18:00:47 +0100
Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i reworked my proposal and ask for comments again.
In Woody, this separation was mostly removed with the package pool.
The seperation you are refering to here has to do with directory layout,
which is a totally
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:18:35 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm a student at Kent University Canterbury UK I will be
starting
my final year project some time next
year and I am looking to find a project that involves linux development
ideally kernel / module based or a port
of
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:21:30 -0500
Vince Mulhollon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/07/2001 11:20:42 AM Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:13:50AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Integrating CVS into Debian (as a core component, not just a
package)
would
be a long,
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:56:23 -0400
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hate CVS, i thought everyone else did as well and people only used
it
because of a lack of alternatives.
http://subversion.tigris.org
Yes, interesting, i hadnt heard
3: What's a better name? deblicator and apt-share have been
suggested so far.
I like deblicator due to its originality, and its not really a part of apt
is it ?
Glenn
Hi, there are a few .dsc files that dont have a Format: field, the few
that i found all had a Standards-Version: 3.0.1, but some packages of that
same Standards-Version do have a Format: field in the .dsc file, i tried
to find more details of theis field.
man dpkg-source refers to it being
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Since the LSB is mainly useful for binary-only distributors, we need not get
annoyed over their choice of rpm. After all, it makes more sense, since most
distributors already have staff that knows how to build rpms anyway.
So the LSB is just about
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make to handle
Joey Hess wrote:
They will be written in C, or perhaps, in POSIX shell script (without
any external commands except ar, tar, gunzip, though..).
If C, would it be ok if it was specific to busybox or would it have to
be independent?
If its writen specifically for busybox it could access
Im trying to understand a few things relating to packaging... take the
kernel for example
I just did a fresh install of potato, and then installed my own kernel
image built by kernel-package, dselect lists my custom kernel as being
the only kernel-image installed, i cant see any reference to the
Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 04:16:08PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im trying to understand a few things relating to packaging... take the
kernel for example
snip
I cant find any details on the virtual package kernel-image except its
name, do virtual packages have
Chris Rutter wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:14:24 Ben Armstrong wrote:
For the most part, I think there is enough flexibility within Debian to
pick and choose the smallest tools that will do the job from among the
binary packages. Where Debian currently falls short, we can create -tiny
89 matches
Mail list logo
