Yo KoV,
On Thu, 03 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
I noticed while creating a package for a gettext enabled program, that
make install was installing the .mo file as progname@INSTOBJEXT@
Well, file important bugs against those packages, telling them to fix their
packages to refresh and
On Tue, 01 May 2001, Brian May wrote:
Henrique == Henrique M Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henrique Fetchmail is not the best tool for dealing with the
Henrique Debian developer mail accounts, plain and simple.
Why not?
Because there isn't a IMAP or POP3 server at the other
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:06:01PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
The client side of fetchmail will (by default) feed each message into your
local MTA for delivery, but you'll have to figure a way to get the mail
into it
from the remote mailbox
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
What I am proposing is a new list, similar in scope to the other l10n
lists, where developers can bring text they need a clean English version
of (be the original in some other language, or their best try in
English), and get a good English translation
On Tue, 09 Jan 2001, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I'm planning to package TADS, which is a system for writing or playing
text games similar to the Z-code system (inform, xzip/frotz/etc). The
license is non-free.
You should probably package the runtime and the compiler in separate binary
This is my answer to a private mail (it seems...) I don't want to talk
about these in private. Please note the reason why I carried this bug
report to the list.
Well, sorry but now you're in MY non-permanent (YET) shitlist for violating
netiquette, and I'll have to acknowledge that Branden Was
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Branden, please understand this for what it is meant: Branden does not like
to be poked. He seems to like even less to be poked by you. Please don't
poke him, he'll bite back and we
Hi Erik!
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001, Erik Hollensbe wrote:
I don't quite get this... This list is moderated. Is it not too much for
Not that I know of.
I have a hard time finding the logic in wasting your time complaing about
how your time is being wasted. What does this solve?
Humans are hardly
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Erik wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 09:16:33PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
That patch has the ability for startup scripts to display messages to the
screen (for such things as Initializing network, Initializing Sound, etc.
I dont see why the same thing couldn't be used
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
I like it, but why not fold this functionality in update-rc.d itself?
update-rc.d --query ? And why not define update-rc.d --list as well..
Well, for starters I don't grok perl, and I wasn't about to let that little
detail stop me from writing
Hello everyone,
Here's an updated version of the RFC text, as well as a new version of the
initscriptquery reference script. The fragments.sh script is included just
for completeness, and was not modified.
Changelog:
* fixed typos, updated documentation to an assertive tone
* addressed rcS.d
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
I would like to have an addition to the initscriptquery which
is something i have been waiting for long. I am interested in this
because i am doing automated installations into a chroot environment.
In this case i am possibly running in the right
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 09:19:10AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Which is why it should only be killed in prerm/preinst.
Which makes all the supposed simple restart solution for the runlevel
problem
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Ingo Saitz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 09:19:10AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
BTW, on an unrelated note, a ps | grep solution *MUST* deal with the
following possible scenarios,
[...]
3. Multiple instances of daemon (and you want to kill only the one you
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
daemon is running, and only restart it if it found it was running?
Because if the user removes but not purges a package, all the configuration
data related to initscripts is kept. The daemon is not running, but the
runlevel restrictions
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This unfortunately doesn't work if you are trying to kill the previous
version of a daemon in the postinst of a package, as the binary will
have changed.
Which is why it should only be killed in
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henrique M. Holschuh) wrote:
ISSUE: Is there a need for pre-depends?
A package which needs a future version of the initsciptquery interface
would need to pre-depends: sysvinit (=someversion) | filerc
(=someversion). How
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
-x...), and only return a exit status code of 1 (start daemon) if this
That should be exit status code 0, of course. Oh well...
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them
Hello debs,
This is a request for comments (and enhancements ;-) ) for a possible
solution to an annoying bug (for those it hits) we currently have: daemons
are started during package installs/upgrades regardless of the current
runlevel.
This behaviour can be fixed, and the fix is not overly
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:28:20AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
I was going to tack this sooner or later (the trust us, we KNOW you
want the daemons to start always current state of almost all daemon
packages annoys me to no end, and from past
On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
Here is what I'm trying to fix: Upgrading a daemon while the system is in
runlevel 4 and the init script system is set up to stop that daemon in
runlevel 4 is a *bug*.
Damn, I should have said Starting a daemon in a upgrade while the
system
On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency information for shared
library /usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot (soname 0, path
/usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot.so.0, dependency field Depends)
[...]
What is the problem and is there anyone who
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
How come Debian don't have a non-X runlevel, like some other
distributions, in the default configuration? I think this would be
pretty convenient.
Because no one has ever bothered
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
It's unfortunate that there's no easy way to find the current runlevel
(the usual who -r from Solaris etc. doesn't work), otherwise this
piece of code could be used:
RL=`who -r`
if [ -x
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
xpdf already conflicts and replaces xpdf-i. Am I correct in saying that
there's no way I can cause an automatic upgrade from xpdf-i to xpdf?
Hmm... I'll take the oportunity to ask an old doubt of mine:
Will it work if xpdf-i is made an empty package
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
false positives.
This used to be true.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:56:54AM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
I don't read debian-devel frequently, so I just caught up on all this
discussion, however I did file one of the bugs about this. Thank you
for taking on this issue! I have one
27 matches
Mail list logo
