On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 19:00 -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
cales...@scientia.net wrote:
You're aware that not only .bash_* and .profile can be distributed
by /etc/skel,... but any other config file (e.g. .vimrc) a specific site
or
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 15:42 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hi.
I'd like the idea... it would make home-dir creation here at the faculty
a lot more easier.
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:08 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The location could for example be /etc/skel.d/
I'd however
Hi guys,
I'm currently thinking about deduplication[1] on my Debian systems.
As you probably know, the whole thing about deduplication is that
replacing files with content with hardlink to other file(s) with the
exact same content is sometimes a good idea, at least to regain
(uselessly used) disk
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote:
For files from packages, though, deduplication might be a good idea, as
dpkg is supposedly the only one to ever modify the files (under /usr for
example).
I don't know however how dpkg treats hardlinks. Does it break
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jerome Warnier]
I don't know however how dpkg treats hardlinks. Does it break the
hardlink before replacing a file or does it replace the file whatever
its real nature is?
You know, given the time it takes to type a 20-line email, including
finding
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Jerome Warnier wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote:
For files from packages, though, deduplication might be a good
idea, as
dpkg is supposedly the only one to ever modify the files (under
/usr for
example).
I don't know
Steve McIntyre wrote:
In article 49c8dcdb.90...@beeznest.net you write:
Before the upgrade, the file is a hardlink (because I hardlinked it
manually), then it tries to upgrade the file/hardlink. Does it break
the hardlink* before upgrading the file or does it overwrite the
file/hardlink
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Jerome Warnier
jwarn...@beeznest.net wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Jerome Warnier wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote:
For files from packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:45:27 +0200
Source: and
Binary: and
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:11:27 +0200
Source: and
Binary: and
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED
Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 18:33 -0500, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Santiago Ruano Rincón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: asterisk-prompt-es-co
Version : 0.0.20060503
Upstream Author : Avatar Ltda. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
Le samedi 21 janvier 2006 à 10:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
[Jérôme Warnier]
But why would you want to become a DD if you are not willing to
maintain a package. Debian is just about maintaining packages.
Debian needs more than just people maintaining packages. We need
people
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: goupil
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Dodji Seketeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://goupil.tuxfamily.org
* License : GPL
Description : Association membership
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pessulus
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gnome.org/~vuntz/pessulus/
* License : GPL
Description : lockdown editor
Le lundi 07 novembre 2005 à 14:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
On Nov 07, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong. Nothing needs BSD ptys but some *very* old applications (I would
not even know where to find one).
At least /sbin/bootlogd does not work without BSD ptys and this is
Le vendredi 14 octobre 2005 à 00:26 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
[..]
The following packages have been orphaned:
and (#333683), orphaned today
[..]
I'm maintainer (but still not DD) of this package and, and the
bugreport does not apply to it, still I do not want to orphan it at all.
I wonder if it is possible to find out on which CD of a stable release
the package I look for is?
I guess it is possible, as apt can do it.
But is it available somewhere online?
Thanks
--
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Le vendredi 13 mai 2005 à 13:00 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
As #302420 says, NFSv4 is not supported by current mount (part of
util-linux) in Sarge/Sid while support is present for the server part.
It would be great
--
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:40:27 +0200
Source: and
Binary: and
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED
incompatible variants.
Worse: debian kernels 2.4.18 didn't have it yet, and a lot of Woody
system probably still have this version.
--
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest
I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge
systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those who
didn't know) and can find only -386 and -686 kernels which could
possibly match.
Somebody knows?
Thanks
--
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:49 +0100, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:33:43PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge
systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those who
didn't know) and can find
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 09:02 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jerome Warnier]
So what? Am I stuck with my problem like so many people are already? And
a friendly takeover of the package?
I suspect you will discover and get stuck in the power games in Debian.
I always found that funny
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:28 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:56:46AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
In fact, I dug into the problem, and found that the initscript
(/etc/cron.daily/sysklogd) had a 'reload-or-restart' argument, which is
used by the cronjob
to package acpid then?
Cheers
David
--
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest s.a r.l.
analysis tool I mean anything relying on
files in /var/log to do something.
I notice that that package has a huge number of bugs, with many having a
patch attached, but many bugs are really old.
Could someone go through the list and NMU this? I'm willing to help, if
necessary.
Thanks
--
Jerome
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 00:46 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jerome Warnier]
Could someone go through the list and NMU this? I'm willing to help,
if necessary.
The maintainer of sysklogd have a problematic relationship with NMUs.
Have a look at bug #225895 for an ironic view
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:51:37 +0200
Source: and
Binary: and
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED
29 matches
Mail list logo
