Does anyone know if Raul Miller is active ?
I and others have looked for him a bit.
He took over pdl from me a couple years ago. I'd like
to get it back (if he wants to get rid of it, of
course). I sent a mail a few days ago and didn't
hear anything.
Thanks, John
*Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
In case someone wants to pick up a package, I'll note which packages (of mine)
I think are likely to have some reasonably sized user base. Some
others may be popular too, I just don't know about
by ignorance.
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my
own.**
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
and realizing that
now there is no evidence and no accusation of a security problem, and
therefore, no reason to take action on a suspected security problem
I apologize to the project for throwing a wrench in the mirroring
system.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
technical issues.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Herbert Xu wrote:
herberOn Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 10:57:54AM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
herberTry
herber
herbermake CC=gcc272 -D__KERNEL__ -I`pwd`/include zImage
I love this man !
Well, I had tried messing around with the /include files, but didn't
get it right
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Chris Rutter wrote:
chrisOn Thu, 16 Sep 1999, John Lapeyre wrote:
chris
chris The 2.0.37 and 2.2.x kernels keep hanging on my AMD K6-2.
chris
chrisThis sounds *bad*, BTW; have you checked around to see if anyone
chriselse has had these kinds of freezing problems? Is your
of a pain for the user, but we could get all 12 new kernels
without adding so much bulk to the archive.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
kernels do fine in the same situation.
I tried to find this issue in the archives, but did not find
much.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Chris Rutter wrote:
chrisOn Thu, 16 Sep 1999, John Lapeyre wrote:
chris
chrisIs it possible to build 2.0.x kernels under a reasonable
chris potato build environment ? I tried make CC=gcc272, but
chris I still get failures from the assembler, I think.
chris
chrisErm
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Chris Rutter wrote:
chrisOn Thu, 16 Sep 1999, John Lapeyre wrote:
chris
chrisThe link to suse doesn't work at the moment, but I'll give it a try.
chris The blurb at cygnus does not look encouraging. I think it is claiming
chris that I have to to change asm constructs
(or a user) should not be forced to
upgrade the kernel because I want to build one more module, which is
almost what happened. (I just happened to have a system with egcs-2.91.66
available.)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
Well here is a little good press...
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/personal/19990524/tech.html
Says,
Caldera Makers of OpenLinux.
Debian High-quality volunteer Linux.
Linux Pro Corporate-aimed implementation from WorkGroup Solutions.
others from possibly investigating the source with an
eye towards taking over maintenance.
I thought the same thing. An announcement of change of
maintainership is appropriate for this list.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu
I really like the how-to-install-gnome page. Other packages that could
use similar pages are X, emacs, and communicator. I and people I have
talked to can get confused trying to decide which packages to download
and install.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ
) don't care, then we won't get commercial support
and recognition. It's probably OK either way. They can't drive us out of
business.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
for Debian because
we actually accomplished something cool rather than making them just to
make the average Slashdot reader think that Debian is as good as Redhat.
A couple of salaried positions would be nice. Full time PR
staff, ...
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
packaging systems today are done with C++
(apt), and perl (install methods).
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
*Marek Habersack wrote:
Yes, yes. But you won't be able to use perl with C++ libraries.
If you use the C interface to the C++ libraries, and reimplement OO
in perl, yes you can. And the C++ wrapping has improved to the point that
people are using it directly for some projects.
--
John
: undefined reference
to _sigjmp_save'
/usr/lib/libc5-compat/libICE.so.6: undefined reference to
_setjmp'
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
. For a
single machine it is relatively painless.
John
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
speed up the process and improve communications.
By the way, I want to see ruby packaged ! I hear that
it is already packaged for Debian JP. I ran the fibonacci test in the
source and it really beat perl badly. I even improved the perl version
and ruby still won.
--
John Lapeyre
be nice
Is the debugging info necessary ? I wonder if it slows things down.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
will be
uploaded, and then months will pass before the release, during which time,
the perl problem will be fixed and forgotten.
( I suggest keeping this message so you can repost it when it is
found that perl 5.005 has destroyed the entire distribution :) )
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED
[FIX] A fixed package (2.1.8) is in Incoming
33428 gpm: freopen(stderr) failed
[FIX] A fixed package (2.1.8) is in Incoming
Mistake.
This is for potato , not slink. An upload was made yesterday,
anyway.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
There have been several packages allowed into main with
a license like this. Some people don't like it however. Perl's
license is even slightly more restricive. Except that now it
can be licensed under the GPL as well.
From: John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 29 Jan 1999 12:44:51
ftp1.us.debian.org now has everything to install all the gnome stuff
libgtop0 is there too.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
or
expensive modem link. I guess I don't care too much about
the cachet of having 2.2 in slink. I wonder if we'll put
2.4 in slink
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 01:32:28PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
I guess I should add this to my last post about how bad the
installation is. The boot floppies themselves and apt are quite good.
Getting the base system on is easy for someone
, because a
full time employee could do quite a bit for the installation process
in a few months, and contribute back to the project.
--
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
I guess I should add this to my last post about how bad the
installation is. The boot floppies themselves and apt are quite good.
Getting the base system on is easy for someone who knows what is going on.
Probably not for a beginner.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
!
(Excuse my yelling, I just wanted to advertise ;) )
Why don't you put an entry in this nice, underutilized tool.
And reward Mr. Grobman for his effort.
See:
http://www.debian.org/fom/1.html
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Stephen Crowley wrote:
crowThat is ridiculous, there is no reason to remove gnome before the freeze,
if you
FWIW, one of the slashdot commenters on the slink-freeze, commends
slink for including gnome ( he did install the packages, too) .
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
library.
N:
N: Refer to Packaging Manual, chapter 12 for details.
N:
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
(!).
This is characteristic of reading and writing outside of array
bounds. (as determined by malloc)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
smb2www 27641 perl 5.005-02 breaks smb2www [0] (Craig Small
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
This one also refers to the version of perl which has been
removed. (It broke every module, so there are several such bug reports)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
of yorick, which is
already packaged
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Shaya Potter wrote:
spotte
spotte-Original Message-
spotteFrom: John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spotte
spotte Lyx is currently in contrib.
spotte Lyx is licensed under the GPL (version 2) . It is dynamically
spottelinked against a non-free library (libforms) .
spotte
).
torin
torinThat's good enough for me. I have boatloads of respect for Andy and his
torinunderstanding of Perl Install issues. That's how it will be for
torin5.005.02-3.
Good, I think that will cause the least problems for the rest of
Debian.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED
it right, you need to get each copyright holder licensing her code
under GPL to allow the code to be distributed under another license, ie,
the GPL+caveat. If you have a lot of code and a lot of sources, this
could be a PITA.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
) of
Lyx. For instance, these binaries use .h files from libforms.
Unlike KDE, it may be all original code, so that a single change
of license from the developers will do.
Am I missing something ?
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
definitly says that it is distributed
under the GPL.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
. (I don't know if lyx uses
one) The fltk author says that he is not working towards compatibility
with forms.
I can't get through to the site now to get the exact statement.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
have an uneasy
feeling about it, but no concrete objections. My guess is that Darrin has
a better idea about it than me. It may be ok, I'll follow it if its set.
Just to summarize, I think we have to either go back to 5.004 , or
push the freeze back a couple of weeks.
John
John
in.
Why they (perl guys) did not leave /usr/lib/perl5 in the search
path is not clear to me. Perhaps because they assume that othe modules
will install in site_perl or local. But systems with package managers,
like ours don't use these dirs.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
. :-] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
olet
olet
olet--
oletTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oletwith a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
olet
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On 10 Oct 1998, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
olet*-John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
olet|
olet| Perl 5.004 was in Incoming yesterday. You can get it from a
olet| mirror of incoming or wait a day or two and it will be installed.
olet
oletI can only find the orig source package:
olet
oletftp ls perl
. We need to
set a policy quickly, as quite a bit of slink has just become unstable.
(Unfortunatley, I was using slink for daily science work. I don't have two
machines.)
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
, it would be good to hear from them. I don't know if
the perl people really expect everyone to redo the 'perl Makefile.PL ... '
process for every perl package evertime perl is upgraded, but it certainly
looks that way.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
rhertzWell it doesn't work out of the box as I expected it. First the
rhertz@INC isn't correct, it doesn't contain /usr/lib/perl5. Please
rhertzDarren can you correct it ?
I downloaded the upstream source. It looks like the omission of
come because its not a bug.
btw. Looks like some really cool stuff in the new perl.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
perl
packages, some of which need help bad in any case.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
manual, this was the case.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
-related bugs are
introduced.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
? Thanks.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
-in
gsstarcompatible with libforms.
I was under the impression that it was not really a drop in
replacement. But I see that you are the maintainer... I guess I can give
it a try.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
, but
there is a September 23 release which is still under the GPL .
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
.
I have built packages and uploaded them to main only to find later
that they depend on non-free libraries that appeared free when I found
them on the web page. (note that when the lib later shows up as a
dependency, it is listed as non-free) .
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
License: GPL
tochnog is a finite element analysis program.
http://info.uibk.ac.at/c/c8/c813/tn_release/tnhome.html
The author calls the executable 'tn' . I should probably change
this to 'tochnog' or 'tng' or something.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
much at once.
A working GUI couldn't hurt in any case (unless it's buggy and
trashes systems !) 15 days of testing isn't much.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
of relative links pointing back up to '/',
this is impossible. I hope there is a good reason for using relative
links, because as it is , /usr must be on the same partition as '/' , or
else consist of an entire partition.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu
If lurkftp is killed and started again (happens alot) it gets
everything that it already got again, even though its supposed to compare
with the local tree. Tell me if I am missing something, otherwise, I'll
file a bug.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
211869
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I was wrong , its happening now with 2.0.33 too. However, its
happening to all three ide drives. I'd better figure it out fast
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Christian Meder wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 12:24:52AM -0700, G John Lapeyre wrote:
A typical error message
running with unmasked interrupts?
hdparm -v /dev/hdb
and look at the unmaskirq flag.
If so try turning it off?
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
on an IO board to function yet
(tried three IO boards) , tried everything I could think of. Does anyone
have experience with this?
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
opinions on this list.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, just suggesting. In the meantime, I've used
apt to easily upgrade many times and hundreds of packages.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
bad...) He'll
probably end up going with RH, or worse, keep lose95 . Just a thought ...
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found the entire kernel/hw clock issue quite confusing. (eg ,
when to use the uct flag ) The man pages help a little. A clock howto
would be quite helpful.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Does anyone have hamm CD's to sell yet ? I have a friend in Paris
who wants to install on a laptop. I'd hate to see him go RH. I think he
has a network card. Maybe apt and a remote archive works pretty well now
for installing ?
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED
the
problem :)
Sasha.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
kernel mods and utilities?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
not-always-correct memory suggests that the gdbm support code
currently lives in /usr/lib/perl5/i386-linux/5.004/auto/GDBM_File
(at least for the intel world).
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
: No $TEXMFMAIN; set the environment variable or in
texmf.cnf.
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-bin
E: Sub-process returned an error code
homey 55
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
a lot of stuff)
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, G John Lapeyre wrote:
I sent a message to the maintainer , but haven't heard back.
Is this something broken on my system ? I tried forcing removal
of all my tetex packages and reinstalling.
I get this when trying to install tetex-bin
not uncommon to see config files which just contain perl
code. (Majordomo comes to mind) . Probably python programs do this too.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
What are the main differences/advantages/disadvantages of
Debian's Packaging System vs The Other Guys (tm) ?
I would appreciate any help in sorting these out (I already have
So would we !
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
There is no possiblity that urgent bugs could arise in my packages
(because the packages are marginal) . But if the impossible happens,
please feel free to upload a fix.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
Does anyone know if something official is released? I have only
seen the irc transcript on slashdot.
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
. But sometimes it is helpful. What are the pros and cons of this
kind of an approach?
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Otherwise apt is impressive. When I show someone how it quietly
upgrades 100 packages, it impresses the hell out of them.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
(samuel), a programming language (induce) and
a program to factorize integers (factorint).
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the work of some of the key
players. I hope Ch. is not leaving because of losing one battle (maybe
its more).
( I am not taking sides on the number-of-maintainers-per-package
issue, or on the how-to-challenge-policy-issue. Those folks may have
taken reasonable positions. )
John Lapeyre
some bugs and worked on
internationalization. Luis should be thanked for making any progress at
all.
(btw, I looked at master a few days ago and couln't find the new
tcsh in incoming , nor in hamm , I'll have another look.)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
instructions on how to get it
to occur under gdb (I had to use the 'attach' command) .
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and route for
appeals for flexibility is the way to go. Rules are the only central
authority holding things together. (Who holds the power to make rules is
another matter.)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
crap on this list ... (!)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
page is at http://linux.miningco.com/library/awards/blapr98.htm
Looks like they've put a good deal of effort into their site. I
don't know who made the ratings(has good taste, I imagine) ... but notice
Debian is the #1 site, while no other distribution made the top 10.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL
) ...
Setting up fvwmconf (0.18-1) ...
Update-menus: waiting for dpkg to finish (forking to background)
Update-menus: (checking /var/lib/dpkg/lock)
homey 6 Cannot open file /etc/X11/mwm//system.mwmrc-menu
/etc/menu-methods//mwm-menumethod: Aborting
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
,
but I didn't . Looks like two things are broken, whatever deleted or
didn't install that file, and update-menus for not working when it's
missing.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
for keeping it out of the archive).
This discussion has come up several times in the nine months that
I've been reading this list. It looks like the time is arriving for
(someone with tons of time) splitting the archive in some way.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http
Just played in AZ, US.
I had to listen to 50 minutes of crap about presidents and big
companies ! They should have put Linux first.
Stallman may be a bit of a crank, but I'd be upset too about GNU
being downplayed out of existence.
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson
, mail me
John
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
