On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:40:03PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
I see how it could be construed as a conflict of interest[1], but it's
not like the process doesn't have plenty of means to prevent that.
Ian Jackson could also see how it could :)
Debian Constitution 2.2.2: the Leader
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
I have an RC bug which is 156 days (or so) old, which is waiting for
upstream to rewrite the program.
When you have maintain a package, shouldn't you be able to fix
it yourself?
He said rewrite.
--
2. That which causes
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:41:37PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
the person who's in charge of the keyring has to be as paranoid as James.
The other person in the project that comes to mind is Manoj. And that's
it. I wouldn't trust Martin with such a responsability, and I don't care
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
A quick grep on bahn.de says that ICE-T trains (presumably the most
~
expensive ones..) have power sockets for every seat. Anyone with
experience on german/austrian railroad?
So, IMHO,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:32:47AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ummm... I *did* find something strange, maybe you can give some more
insight on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ find /etc -type f -perm -755|xargs file|grep ELF
etc/X11/rstart/rstartd.real:ELF 32-bit LSB
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:15:26PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
it would be trivial to add lintian/linda warnings for this,
There's already a warning for set[ug]id in Lintian.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:50:20PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
Please, let's decide based on facts rather than some hopelessly obsolete
sympathy for the so-called Eastern Europe(TM).
What sympathy? The Slavic nations should form their own union, and
Canada, the USA, Australia, and New
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
sponsors, get the location fixed and find the time to raise the money
needed for the travels
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Another good argument for Vienna : being central in Europe, it is
close to the most eastern countries of the continent...which could
help our friends from Eastern Europe to attend the conference more
conveniently
Being
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:12:53AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
(Note that for example that while adding DAMs has been suggested nobody
has yet posted a list of prospective and capable candidates.)
You're breaking my balls, stop that, you're breaking my balls /cartman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:40:42 +0200
Source: maildrop
Binary: maildrop
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
by accident I discovered bug #200180 at the fdutils bug report page
http://bugs.debian.org/fdutils
I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:12:36 +0200
Source: texinfo
Binary: texinfo info
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Version: 1.2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
maint-guide - Debian New Maintainers' Guide
maint-guide-de - German translation of Debian New Maintainers' Guide
maint-guide-es - Spanish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:01:35 +0200
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.6.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Policy List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
The discussion is only about global reasons, as wrong license, we
don't need this package or simmilar. This reasons could be discussed
before making the package quite as easy as afterwards.
OK, so basically you think ftpmaster
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:26:43PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
OK, so basically you think ftpmaster people should spend review each ITP
for such global rejection reasons, then? You can't expect this to happen
in any remotely timely fashion, at least not with this many ftpmasters
and this
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:57:35PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
E2tools is a simple set of GPL'ed utilities to read, write, and
manipulate files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem.
please excuse my ignorance - what would be the advantage of these
tools over the core file utilities which use
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:39:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
So be it. The Social Contract and the traditions of our project
compel us to make principled decisions, not politically expedient
ones.
Not correct. Look at the handling of security issues. The project
has chosen (never
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:04:51PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
So be it. The Social Contract and the traditions of our project
compel us to make principled decisions, not politically expedient
ones.
Not correct. Look at the handling of security issues. The project
has chosen
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
In the past years, I have found it annoying that the eicar anti-virus
testfile is not available as aptable Debian package.
Why is this annoying? The virus cannot be detected without it?
I find it disturbingly impolite to say sorry,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:00:47 +0200
Source: wmgtemp
Binary: wmgtemp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Lenart Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:42:28PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Great, for a default application...
(ok, man mawk...)
I wonder what makes the following more convenient for a default
application to me...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gawk --help
[...]
And this proves exactly what? Someone who knows
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:54:30AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
I have been receiving bugs.d.o emails which are unrelated to my
package for the last two-three days.
That would be because you're subscribed to
debian-bugs-{dist,closed,forwarded}...
And their headers seem quite garbled: they
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:36:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but also of
generating them. This
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:41:21PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I'd say that writing a meaningful package description is certainly the
duty of the individual package maintainer. A package maintainer should
usually have an idea of what his/her package is good for, while Javier
would
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:17:58PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
the worst culprits are usually sets of binary packages from the one source
file
which have package descriptions like libfoo-dev = dev files for libfoo,
libfoo-doc = documention for libfoo, and libfoo = runtime files for
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:09:29PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I was wondering, should I make a mass filing of bugs for those packages
who fail to produce a proper description?
Since this can seemingly be checked automatically, I would prefer you
make a patch for lintian and/or linda
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
As i686 is already like ten(?) years old,
I was intrigued by this statement and went to look it up.
CPU:Released:
-
80386 1985
80486 1989
Pentium 1993
Pentium Pro
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:36:49AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
But currently I am quite annoyed about all those questions I got asked.
i am very sure, I did never have touched this file, so why is dpkg always
asking me if i want to overwrite it?
I just wanted to say
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:26:18AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Is isn't in the Debian archive anymore for unstable..
$ madison libsensors1
libsensors1 |2.6.3-5 |stable | i386
libsensors1 |2.6.5-4 | testing | i386
KDE needs to be recompiled (see e.g. #196370 to
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
Yep, i took the one from the Quark 3.0 announce, which i suppose was the
one of a previous version and should have been replaced by the one from
the web site.
Also, you could remove the leading an from the short description,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
Just out of curiosity, how will this be accomplished?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:11:22PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Given that it's been pointed out that the MTA supports per-user bouncing
of mail from open relays, and that it's very possible to use LDAP to
provide easy management of per-user preferences, why is there any need
to continue
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:37:00AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
Given the ammount of spam that I get delived to my account via Debian
machines, I guess the reduction in bandwidth usage by master and murphy
is not to be taken lightly.
The reduction happens in the output,
Which is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:46:15 +0200
Source: wmgtemp
Binary: wmgtemp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lenart Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 18:27:09 +0200
Source: gtkpool
Binary: gtkpool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:30:24 +0200
Source: gtkpool
Binary: gtkpool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:39:38AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
* Closes:
also says this version fixes a problem reported in #, but I think we
can all agree that's not an acceptable entry.
I most strongly disagree. The practice of closing upstream bugs with
the New upstream
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:54:47AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
I care about the fact that S/N in d-d is already bad enough without
having to watch (out for) these pissing contests.
You may notice that some of us will care about what you're saying only
if you complain about the next
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:07:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
what if the maintainer uploads a new upstream release which happens to fix
bug #xxx, and then sends a message by hand to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the message This bug is fixed in upstream version x.y.z.
The submitter would still have
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:29:56PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
what if the maintainer uploads a new upstream release which happens to fix
bug #xxx, and then sends a message by hand to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the message This bug is fixed in upstream version x.y.z.
The submitter would still
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:32:22PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
It's very nice to see that the rest of the world has been kind enough
not to tell anything about deploying this to our menu system maintainer. :P
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200207/msg00815.html
(and
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 01:29:57PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I saw all that, but none of that constitutes contacting the menu maintainer!
If our menu maintainer hasn't watched debian-devel (or more prominently,
read DWN) for the last 10 months, then something is seriously wrong.
The
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:43:56PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Should /etc/hostname contain only short hostname, or FQDN name?
Is this documented anywhere?
I've always thougth that /etc/hostname should contain short hostname.
But e.g. etherconf package puts FQDN name there ...
Eh,
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:18:27AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Is the Debian menu system going to convert to using the freedesktop
menu spec?
http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/menu/draft/menu-spec/menu-spec.html
As far as I know both Gnome and KDE follow it and possibly
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Should /etc/hostname contain only short hostname, or FQDN name?
Is this documented anywhere?
I've always thougth that /etc/hostname should contain short hostname.
But e.g. etherconf package puts FQDN name there ...
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:42:29AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Or better:
1. discover security vulnerability
2. was it fixed in the Debian package?
3. read changelog
4. see a bunch of completely worthless Closes: messages
5. throttle maintainer
1. defenestrate loser maintainers
2. ???
3.
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:39:50AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Perhaps a separate, concise message to debian-devel-announce?
I doubt it would help. I see changelog abuse as an act of laziness, not
ignorance. Common sense says that you should be listing changes in the
changelog. It's not
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:56:27PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I really don't see the point in this. Submitters always have a copy of
their
report, so they have evrything they need.
New upstream closes: #1, #2, #3 implyes an update of the upstream
changelog
file so it's worth
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:12:51AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
Yes, but there's still no bloody point in making the submitter hunt around
for information that the maintainer already knows and for which it takes
them full 10 seconds per bug to list (15 if they type very
Hi,
I'm perplexed about the mailing list request about Exim.
On one hand, exim is an important package, and there are already ample
precedents like debian-apache, debian-ssh and debian-tetex-maint;
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:36:23PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
but on the other hand, there's alioth.debian.org which allows for easier
creation and maintenance of per-package mailing lists.
we should generally decide to migrate (all) mailinglists, or only create
new project mailinglists
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Please note that the mailing list request was filed months ago - well
before alioth went into service - and that your e-mail is the first
reaction to the bug report filed.
Yes, I know.
We actually discussed on the internal exim
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:58:31PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:28:34AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
And it generally causes confusion in bug submitters' mind: how many of
them knows the difference between a fixed and a closed bug? A brief
note about NMU changes incorporation in changelog and closing those
bugs in BTS by hand
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form.
I should mention also that to get a
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and packaging fltk1.1
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
haven't done
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote:
* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616)
Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs.
Do it using BTS directly.
Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends doing that on
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:27:40PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote:
* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616)
Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs.
Do it using BTS directly.
Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
BTW, why at the time of my first post many DNS weren't neither able to
resolve the alioth.debian.org hostname? I think that it should be
resolvable even when alioth is down, shouldn't it?
No because alioth has its own DNS
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Well, yeah, sure, but the highway analogy doesn't apply. There isn't a
single technical reason why I as a random person need to ever be in any
sort of contact with a spammer to keep the system running.
There was no mention of
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Society evolves and with it rules change, we need to accept this and see
what evolves - if it turns out to be bad then limits will have to be
applied, but I'm not seeing a complete state of anarchy break out yet...
Right now we're
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:28:27PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Right now we're getting really damn close to anarchy, when everyone and
their dog has the means to entirely obliterate everyone else's mailbox
with unwanted whatever-they-have-to-say, and sometimes even obliterate
their computer
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:27:07PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
so maybe it was actually only filed in my brain (which has no web
interface) ...
We need a bug system for developer's brains.
Agreed...
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s Misplacement of apostrophes
Package: doogie
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
If you know how to reach any of the people listed in [1] and [2] below,
please feel free to contact them and get them to reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a mnemonic for that? I.e., does wat stand for something?
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:27:31PM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
*plonk*
*plonk*
Can the QA team use an additional 5-20 hours a week of volunteer help
from an already-registered Developer? Could the Project use another
Alpha autobuilder? If not
The Project always needs more help, but it
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
[...]
The mentors core-team is:
[...]
the debian mentors core-team
core team? So, when can we expect expulsions? :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Please Cc: unless you mail -devel.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Stephane Jourdois wrote:
I just noticed that not all packages in sid do provide md5 checksums
for the files they contains.
What should be done against this ? Shall we file bugreports against
all packages that we can found, or perhaps lintian should
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:45:29AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I'd like to see a place where the status of all the various places where
potential Sarge release issues are tracked. I feel that
http://www.debian.org/devel/testing was missing things, and I didn't see
anything else like this.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
They are in experimental, see
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=exim4searchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Rather than the obscenely ugly URL like that, use the convenient
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:06:32AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
If you want to keep one of the following packages, please make sure to
- change the title of the bug from O: to ITA: as described on
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
- make an upload to the archive, change the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I suggest we remove packages which haven't entered testing after more
more then 300 days.
Packages can be stuck out of testing due to their dependencies, so 300 days
of lag only indicates a serious problem with a package, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:14:48 +0200
Source: libnasl
Binary: libnasl2 libnasl-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:47:15 +0100
Source: nessus-plugins
Binary: nessus-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:20:14 +0100
Source: nessus-core
Binary: nessus nessusd nessus-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:23:19 +0100
Source: nessus-libraries
Binary: libnessus-dev libnessus2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:22:37 +0200
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:55:15 +0100
Source: gentoo
Binary: gentoo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.11.34-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:04:00 +0100
Source: xmms
Binary: xmms-dev xmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:45:13 +0100
Source: xmms
Binary: xmms-dev xmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:33:54 +0100
Source: libnasl
Binary: libnasl2 libnasl-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:42:21 +0100
Source: gtkpool
Binary: gtkpool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:21:41 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:58:48 +0100
Source: maildrop
Binary: maildrop
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:03:15 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:26:11 +0100
Source: wmmount
Binary: wmmount
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0beta2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:33:42 +0100
Source: gtkpool
Binary: gtkpool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:27:46 +0100
Source: doc-debian
Binary: doc-debian
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 12:32:33 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:32:10 +0100
Source: nessus-libraries
Binary: libnessus-dev libnessus1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:36:36 +0100
Source: libnasl
Binary: libnasl1 libnasl-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:38:31 +0100
Source: nessus-core
Binary: nessus nessusd nessus-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:47:26 +0100
Source: nessus-plugins
Binary: nessus-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:09:55 +0100
Source: texinfo
Binary: texinfo info
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:39:38 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.22.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
For packages.debian.org, why not extract the changelog and the copyright from
the diff of the source when building the pages ? Something like
filterdiff -z -i '*/debian/copyright' package.diff.gz
Amazingly enough, this wouldn't
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:14:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Would someone care to tell Mr. Sheinberg about the new submitter
feature?
I tried, but then I got a MTA warning message. Bleh.
Hmm, I notice that it isn't documented on
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control yet...
Yes it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:53:27 +0100
Source: nessus-core
Binary: nessus nessusd nessus-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josip
201 - 300 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
