On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:29:55PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I am happy to take it.
Several people already stepped in (which, IMHO, replies to the Do we
need dupload? question). See the bug report. Josip Rodin was the
first one, even before I formally orphaned it.
Fine with me
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:24:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: xbase
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: normal
xbase |2.0.0-1 | unstable | source
xbase | 3.3.6-11potato32 |stable | all
This seems pretty broken to me ... it's a source package, so the
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:58:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Josip I checked had a stagnating number of subscribers than a few
Josip months before, the traffic on the web pages continues to
Josip slowly grow or stagnate in the new year, and the major
Josip mirrors' traffic is also
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:13:38PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
after the dust settles after the CD stampede
Speaking of which, what's the tactic to get this done efficiently? I suppose
we could coordinate with several mirror maintainers to have them rsync copies
of the final images before the
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:24:22PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Reasons enough to release woody+1 not too late.
Speaking of which, woody+1 sounds like it's going to be a release similar to
link -- no huge changes to cause a prolongued release time.
So, the Debian Installer is already
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed'
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:34:13PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Read up on the BTS docs, but the common ways are:
Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: close 140049
No! Don't fucking do that!
Geez, how many times does one have to repeat that.
--
2. That which causes joy or
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Paolo Redaelli wrote:
Looking at the testing and stable problems pages on master, I now notice
that for each and every architecture in potato, there are less
uninstallable packages in woody that in potato.
All in all, nearly doubling the
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:39:21PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Submit to http://net2.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/debconf2/index.html
If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
to a conference run by Free Software bigots, goes through heavily
non-free and proprietary
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
I heard something about a new release of Gnome coming out too. Gcc 3.1's
also due soon. We're also a
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
Is this somekind of demonstration of how much shit is usually filtered, or
did someone open the floodgates by mistake?
Likely the latter.
Word on the street ;) is that all posts by non-subscribers are filtered
through
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:09:07PM +0200, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
Is this somekind of demonstration of how much shit is usually filtered, or
did someone open the floodgates by mistake?
Likely the latter.
Word on the street ;) is that all posts by non-subscribers are filtered
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
Aptconf will allow users to configure sources.list via debconf. It
will also contain a configlet for setting up sources.list via the
GNOME Control Center, in druids, and potentially other settings.
Ooh nice, maybe you could
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:32:09PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
This was prompted by the GCC GNATS system, which has dozens of PRs created
by these ACKs.
The GCC GNATS maintainer has contacted us already about it and a solution
will definitely be worked out...
(patches welcome as always)
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:36:58AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
Are there any statistics somewhere, how many packages use debmake,
how many use debhelper and how many use something completely different?
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends debmake Sources | egrep '^Package' | wc
92 184
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:50:26AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers.
I don't really regard that as a reasonable solution. For example, my
email client doesn't (as far as I know) allow adding arbitrary headers
to a message. I suppose you
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Isn't it about time for another BSP? It's been a month; I see quite a
lot of RC bugs in the bts with patches.
How about this weekend? What's required to coordinate a BSP anyway?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:55:12PM +0200, Juan Cespedes wrote:
Thanks, I have VERA, but was dissappointed not to see BSP in there. It's
nice to know that it'll be added.
In fact, there are a lot of acronyms used in Debian I cannot find in VERA:
Just in case anyone doesn't know...
BSP =
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:26:37PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The big problem of this packaga is that it is not built from one
upstream source, but I can not split it because this will cause big code
duplication in the source packages. I use my software for reencoding
Type1 fonts and
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:41:31AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
it's unreasonable to have a nontechnical barrier to entry which doesn't
apply to existing members.
Agreed.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
packages is not helping the project.
If the package is useful it is helping the users.
I wonder if such people really know that Debian is not only about
technique
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 08:45:51PM +0100, Manfred Wassmann wrote:
Huch, apt-get install xfonts-base-transcoded and you have fixed fonts
with latin15 charset. And visit:
http://channel.debian.de/faq/DebianDE-21.html
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-euro-support/
Vielen Dank
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:38:40AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Considering that an upload hasn't been made to rectify this root hole,
why hasn't something else been done about it - regular or security NMU?
One would think that this is definitely serious.
I saw this recently...
From: Ben
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:34:56PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
Sounds good. Maybe we should provide a description of this technique
somewhere within webml or ddp.
WWW/doc folks: any hint about sponsorship uploading practices?
At least an FAQ would be apropriate in my opinion.
A better
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
I'am the maintainer of the package scalable-cyrfonts. It's purpose was
to contain all free scalable Cyrillic fonts I know about. However
recently the upstream of most of these fonts has added many non-Cyrillic
letters to them.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:08:13AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Brainfood is scheduling downtime for murphy.debian.org(which is also
lists.debian.org, and runs all the mailing lists), to do a disk upgrade.
This
is just the addition of a new drive, with no copying of the existing data.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 06:35:20PM -0800, Yves Arrouye wrote:
A Debian native source package is one which has no .diff.gz, because the
Debian source code and the upstream source code are the same thing. This
means that the source tarball contains a debian/ directory with the
necessary
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
But is doesn't have an AltGr key...
I would say, AltGr is which ever key functions as Mode_switch. AltGr
just something printed on the key functioning as Mode_switch on some
keyboards. For example, I have CapsLock functioning as
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:34:53AM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december
and haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a
new version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is
a year
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:54:26PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
IMHO, retitling to ITA: without explanation is seen as an attemp
to adopt a package..
Retitling ITA to ITA+description should be pretty clear without explanation.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:23:50AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see:
Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04
What's up with this? This is not a legitimate
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04
What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO.
Probably the
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:28:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you
get from debian archive.
What, you want the devel/people script to check the validity of the emails
in the Packages files?
But that was quite some days
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
DSA 041
Package: joe
Preparer: Wichert Akkerman
Actually, I did this at one point, but then elmo said it won't get
accepted.
because of the two different joe_2.8.orig.tar.gz files.
-rw-rw-r--
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:46:45PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
DSA 041
Package: joe
Preparer: Wichert Akkerman
Actually, I did this at one point, but then elmo said it won't get
accepted.
because of the two different joe_2.8.orig.tar.gz
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:18:39PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[DEBNAME vs DEBFULLNAME]
I filed a bug against devscripts (#115601) ages ago about this, i got
bitten nastily by this. I personally prefer DEBNAME.
It seems that we can't get a consensus Which some other tools
are those
Hi,
It seems the lack of a m68k package for proftpd 1.2.4-2 is stopping proftpd
from propagating into testing, and the change between -1 and -2 is a
security fix.
However, the package should exist, as shown on:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:26PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
maybe some other DD can pick out those security updates and upload
them to stable.
The people who have prepared a security advisory should upload the
respective packages to stable as well. Hence please upload the
referring
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:47:30AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
maybe some other DD can pick out those security updates and upload
them to stable.
The people who have prepared a security advisory should upload the
respective packages to stable as well. Hence please upload
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:04:01AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
groff stable1.15.2-2alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
groff updates 1.15.2-3i386
Changelog says:
* Use lpr as the print spooler, even if it happens not to be
installed on the
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:26:05PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
67.75 Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry. Didn't think. This is naturally GOOD!
No, it shows others how they can inflate their karma -- rampant roxen module
packaging ;p
--
2. That which causes joy or
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 01:47:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Creating a bug report has the advantage of sharing the status of the issue
with other users and developers, but the disadvantage of annoying
developers who are oversensitive about bug reports.
How about make a blacklist in the bug
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
However, the more people are involved, the more coordination has to
be done.
And considering we're all antisocial disobliging SoBs, this is a fatal flaw ;
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:21:07PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote:
where can I find the descriptions of the official debian subsection which
can be specified in the Section field of the control file?
I need something similar to the /usr/share/tasksel/debian-tasks.desc file
which describes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:01:05AM +, Sulaiman Alhasawi wrote:
Also, I recommend you to maintain Arab web pages, documents, and
other translations for Debian. Please refer
http://www.debian.org/international/ for detail.
Sure . Thats what im interested in and thats why im here . Im
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:11:10PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
mail.*/var/log/mail.log
mail.info -/var/log/mail.info
mail.warn -/var/log/mail.warn
mail.err /var/log/mail.err
AFAICT the first one is
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Nick Phillips wrote:
Besides, it was probably the ignorant Brits on the committee that decided
on the codes that insisted that they didn't like UK :(
Well, UK is rather improper for a country code, because that is an acronym
for a generic term. Same
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:14:52PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
People shouldn't have to sift through a bunch of entries of boring and
meaningless text (to them, at least :) to get such information...
The same being true of README.Debian.
Everything in README.Debian should be admin-oriented
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:51:21PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
There is already a standard, reliable way of communicating package
changes to the admin. Amazingly enough, it's called a changelog. I
usually find them under /usr/share/doc/packagename/...
We can't really expect the
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:46:52PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
In the future, though, package management frontends should make it easy to
view README.Debian at installation time.
I agree, a button called Debian README in an X frontend would really be
convenient.
--
2. That which causes
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:37:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
...and the new prerm remove it, and future versions of these scripts
until the end of ti^W^W^Wrelease after next...
Actually, if you'd also ship the symlink in the new .deb, dpkg would
remove it. Or am I missing your
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:11:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Your scheme works, but at least tell the sys admin what is going on with
a debconf note.
If you don't want to be bugged change the debconf priority.
I've got it set to high. Apparently a number of maintainers think that
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:34:38PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
We can't really expect the admins to parse through hundreds of changelogs;
README.Debian would be a good place, though.
OTOH, apt-listchanges displays the changelog upon upgrade, whereas there's
no automated way to display
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:53:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Would turning /usr/lib/procmail-lib into a symlink to the appropriate
location be acceptable?
This, in particular, won't work, because dpkg won't replace a directory with
a symlink. You could, however, replace the files
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:18:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Would turning /usr/lib/procmail-lib into a symlink to the appropriate
location be acceptable?
This, in particular, won't work, because dpkg won't replace a directory
with
a symlink. You could, however, replace
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 06:20:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I received this autoresponse to two different messages I sent to the BTS
this
evening. Anyone have any insights into this particular bit of nonsense?
Received this too when I submitted a bug yesterday.
But apparently,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 06:53:08PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
Sorry for abusing the list - can't find pseudo packages list on www.d.o?
For a few days now i get this:
index maint [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error getting Bug list for maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (code 256
):
Your terminal lacks
Hi,
Here's some interesting trivia: the debian-announce mailing list now has
more than twenty thousand subscribers. See http://lists.debian.org/stats/
for that and more statistics about our mailing lists[1].
I propose a virtual toast: here's to the twenty thousand, and let's hope
that the
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:21:20 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Mon,
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:09:57PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
it depends upon the font that you use. the latin-9 font contains the
sideways quake two symbol, ¤, (some fonts will show that as a o with
four little tick marks on it)
Your Content-Type was
Content-Type: text/plain;
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:27:16AM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
Just use LC_CTYPE=de_DE. It'll work fine in mutt. (The problem is, if
I remember correctly, that X uses ISO8859-1, without the first dash.)
Ok, but now I am confused...
LC_CTYPE=de_DE
LANG=de_DE
LC_MESSAGES=C
Should
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:00:56PM +0300, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
On the bts web interface, it's written that closed bugs are cleaned
up after a period of inactivity. Are they permanently erased?
I'd prefer that a complete history of all bugs is preserved.
They aren't, that sentence is
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:48:54PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Well I guess you could use sourceforge.
I assume that the author has his reasons for not wanting to use
Sourceforge.
There are (were?) mailing lists for other projects on lists.debian.org...?
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:53:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Maybe its too difficult to provide consistent package files for the short
window while the mirror updates are running. No cons.
But is it possible to set some kind of flag to indicate that I am probably
downloading just
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:35:53PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
The solution is to get LANG set to at least en_US by default for
everyone, as LANG=C is just not useful any more.
Changing the LANG to en_US may have some unexpected side effects and
should not be done without at least some
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 May 2001 04:50:13 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Thu,
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:46:15PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
Changing the LANG to en_US may have some unexpected side effects and
should not be done without at least some thought for the consequences.
(E.g., the sort order will be radically different.)
Hear, hear, the thing with the
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:01:08PM +0200, may wrote:
why the hell did you hack my site!!???!!
i opened it today...
and it was full!! of you're icons
why why why!!!??
I will report you!
and i Will shut you down if i have to!
pleas check it out
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:38:06AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Changing the LANG to en_US may have some unexpected side effects and
should not be done without at least some thought for the consequences.
(E.g., the sort order will be radically different.)
Hear, hear, the
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:48:33AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
It acts as if the interpunction doesn't exist, which is just plain wrong!
And it's not happening on potato.
Whee, I switched to Debian in time to catch the fury here, too.
Basically, the situation is:
Take it up with
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
It acts as if the interpunction doesn't exist, which is just plain wrong!
Actually I'd expect my dictionary to be sorted exactly this way.
A paper dictionary would never contain a word starting with a `.', at least
not one
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:26:12PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
A paper dictionary would never contain a word starting with a `.', at least
not one written in my language :)
Even if it explains the term .com? :)
You got me there. :)
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination
Hi,
Here's a bug closing message with two bugs in it. First, the closes are done
with 'close nnn' command which is not nice to the submitters, and second,
the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces.
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 May
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:51:07AM +0200, Matthijs Melchior wrote:
Received: from myhostname.my.isp.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with
ESMTP id f3QDlYZ2018784
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:47:34
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:37:21AM -0500, Warren A. Layton wrote:
Why would you keep something around if you don't want to run it? Debian
makes the (correct) assumption that if you've installed something, you
want to run it. If i install bind, it will assume i want it to run.
Well, not
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:25:34AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
The question you should be asking is, why is portmap installed by default?
Fortunately, nowadays it can be removed since it's no longer part of
netbase.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:34:04AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Joey If these tools become widly enough accepted that we think
Joey everyone should have them available by default, we can make
Joey them standard priority.
In the new universe (debbootstrap, tasksel, etc) where a user
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:05:20PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
$ host -v -t MX -A debian.org
Query about debian.org for record types MX
Found 1 address for debian.org
Checking debian.org address 198.186.203.20
!!! debian.org address 198.186.203.20 maps to klecker.debian.org
[...]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:09:51PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
You guys are getting more and more bureaucratic. That's sad.
That said, why don't you report the bug directly to the upstream, instead
of insisting on this (bureaucratic) procedure of reporting bugs to
[upstream]
There is (should be)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:10:48PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
(I filed this as bug#95252, but used X-Debian-CC instead of X-Debbugs-CC.
Strange... I remember it being X-Debian-CC once.)
It was, a couple of years ago. :) It was renamed in debbugs because other
people started using it and it
Hi,
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] address causes occasional bounces every now and
then, and it seems to be due to connectivity problems (connection timing
out, every time). Incidentally, this particular message was _from_ the same
address, but that isn't so every time, bug reports get lost.
Please don't
Hi,
Looks like another one of those Maintainer fields broken by hp/agilent split
or whatever it was...
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:05:26 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 07:08:34PM -0500, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
The Debian banner that is shown on VA / SourceForge or whatever pages,
still says Debian 2.1. Don't we have something more up to date?
http://www2.valinux.com/images/ads/2.gif
Of course we do. It's them who don't. :| See
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:58:44PM +, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
Now I agree that there's lots of bloat in Gnome, but I have to disagree
with you about Glib. [...]
Well, I've heard these arguments a lot and I agree with them to some extent.
I
[...]
I think in principle glib may be a good
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:19:03AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
David, from your comments below, you seem to be using kpkg, while I use
make. I got my 2.2.19 source from ftp.kernel.org, and, after a bit of
unusual bother untarring it, did 'make mrproper ; make menuconfig'. At
this point I had to
Hi,
The BTS got several of these...
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:06:10 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed:
Hmm, is this a typo in the domain name?
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:09:40 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery
Hello people,
A new mailing list has been created that contains everything about
intents to package something, orphan, adopt, withdraw, whatever.
It's called -= debian-wnpp =- and it gets whatever [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets.
If you like the weekly summaries that get posted to this list,
subscribing
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:44:01AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Josip Oh, of course. (Packages including several shared libraries
Josip suck as far as our naming scheme is concerned :o)
Does bind come with multiple libraries? If so, I think they should
really be split up, according to
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 08:56:41PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
You have the gall to quote private email on a public list, and
expect people to accord you any attention whatsoever? Have you ever
heard of nettiquette?
There is nothing personal in my reply and neither in quoted text
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
That's everyone's hoping :) It was down for a few days in the last month,
even. :(
Didn't know that. There hasn't been any discussion I've seen. So I wasn't
sure whether it was a local problem. Anyway, is sourceforge not well
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just
end up in package bind9, I'm still
working on the details
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:48:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just end up in
package bind9, I'm still working on the details
bind9-dev - static libraries and include files
Josip Those two should be named libbind9 and
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:57:35AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
ttf-xtt is Free Japanese TrueType fonts include watanabe-mincho and
wadalab-gothic (converted by me, used cb2ttj)
xfont-xtt is psude package to use ttf-xtt on X. It includes
fonts.scale and fonts.alias
Package:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:25:58PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
MM in which paket do I find the desired files ?
Here :
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
And for those who are lazy to type,
http://packages.debian.org/
Heck, most browsers will accept simply packages.debian.org :)
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:47:51PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
MM Of course a quick search in there revealed nothing poping up for cdda.
Very strange. I've find that in unstable :
usr/include/cdda_interface.hsound/libcdparanoia0-dev
usr/include/cdda_paranoia.h
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:56:21PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:47:51PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
MM Of course a quick search in there revealed nothing poping up for cdda.
Very strange. I've find that in unstable :
usr/include/cdda_interface.hsound
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:58:04PM +0100, Matthijs Melchior wrote:
To read the changelog I have to download and install it. But I don't
like to install unknown compilers on my development machines. Especially
since there is no undo operation for dpkg -i.
To read the changelog, you do
401 - 500 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
