-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:31:14 +0100
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.131-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:23:00PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
Le dimanche 09 décembre 2007 à 19:11 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
Just curing the symptoms instead of the problems will not help to get
there any sooner.
What if there is no problem?
For example, pkg-config
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:45:46AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Ok, let's consider another very simple case:
libshout allows to perform streaming of speex, vorbis, and theora formats.
Hence, when asking for the libs to link with, you got -lspeex and -ltheora
since it's needed to
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
An example would be package foobar3 build-depending on libfoo3 (=
2.10.2). When built against libfoo3 2.12.0-2 which provides a symbols
file, the resulting binaries need symbols from libfoo3 (= 2.8.7) (as
the symbols file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:39:34 +0100
Source: libtool
Binary: libtool-doc libltdl3 libtool libltdl3-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.5.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:20:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
With debhelper 5.0.61, dh_makeshlibs will also call dpkg-gensymbols if it
finds debian/package.symbols (or debian/package.symbols.arch). So
for packages using debhelper, the only thing to do is to drop the
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:24:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:27:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst:
That's inevitable because http://incoming.debian.org is not signed; The
update frequency of that repository (which is available only to
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypto
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:50:51PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
AFAIK there's nothing to be fixed here. If you specify both --build and
--host, autoconf sees this as a request for cross-compiling. Of course,
invoking the native compiler as a cross-compiler should /generally/ give the
same
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:49:11PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
As I see what Neil wrote, nocheck (I prefer this over notest) affects
only testsuite. As for *handling* packages that run compiled code during
build.. well that's the reason why scratchbox was invented :)
I'm confused about how
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:47:17PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
Making the last stage optional means that -nocheck achieves nothing,
IMHO. If the maintainer chooses to allow 'make check' during the build,
I believe that Policy should stipulate that the maintainer must ensure
that 'make check'
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:39:47 +0200
Source: ntp
Binary: ntp-doc ntpdate ntp
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian NTP Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Indeed on modern multicore systems running the decompression in a
separate process allows it to be run on a separate CPU, in parallel to
the other processing done by dpkg proper. So it might be faster.
(I haven't done any
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:34:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team):
quoting Adam Heath from #debian-devel:
Thanks for passing that on.
2007-10-15 18:07 eigood dpkg's configure has an option for using
shared
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:48:02PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi Ian,
* Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-15 19:59]:
Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team):
Yes, dpkg for example links statically against libbz2 and zlib just to
pick a famous example.
IMO
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:08:06PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:48:02PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi Ian,
* Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-15 19:59]:
Nico Golde writes (Re: Bits from the Testing Security team):
Yes, dpkg for example links statically
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
How to help listmasters against spam
* If you notice a spam in the list archives, press the 'Report As
Spam'-Button.
I don't see such a button on the list archives. I only see
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
[Please add me to your CC list.]
I request an adopter for the kbd package.
Actually it was never my intention to maintain kbd, but its
maintainer was the group Console utilities maintainers
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 10:41:08AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how to cope with the following problem: The auto-building
of the wordnet package failed on mipsel and sparc with:
...
Unpacking bsdmainutils (from .../bsdmainutils_6.1.7_sparc.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
OpenSSL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:36:03PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
It's not about one timezone. The new release refresh all available
timezones. The whole package was synced with the latest Olson
database.
It would be good if you fixed #416206, and used tzdata yourself. So
that we only need to
tzdata doesn't mean
it shouldn't try and use tzdata if it's available on Debian.
The binary data in the tzdata should be easy to parse. See
man tzfile(5).
2007/9/25, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:36:03PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
It's not about one timezone
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Using host from bind9-host,
$ host http.us.debian.org
http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
http.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225
http.us.debian.org has address
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:19:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/438179
This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to
all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable
behavior due to this change in glibc
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
2/ Second example, libconfig0 has a supplementary symbols
[...]
_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ on sparc and alpha. I don't know where it comes
from.
Is this a internal symbols that I missed?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:13:32AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
He doesn't give any information _why_ this complicates packaging that
much, while his decision imposes additional work and complexity on
others (be it the exception in lintian and probably linda or the
difference between dpkg -L
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:12:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It strikes me that if we want to make it policy, having dpkg generate
the checksums upon creating the .deb would be the simplest and best way
to do it. This way we wouldn't have to
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:25:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Some packages (aspell and ispell packages in particular) ship files
that they then modify in maintainer scripts and intentionally exclude
them from the md5sums file for that reason. lintian has special code
to deal with this
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:27:45AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
The hash file, which is architecture dependend, is created on install.
This is the only file in the package that is architecture dependend.
If it is created on install, why is it in the packages filelist in the
first place?
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
.
[ Kurt Roeckx ]
* New upstream release
.
[ Peter Eisentraut ]
* Removed mentions of -d and -D options from ntpd and ntpq man pages
(closes: #427634, #428241)
* Added reference from ntpdate man page to ntpdate-debian
(closes: #427981)
Files:
c937862f7d98a8225a7b3b905c40de5f
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:53:37PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2007, 14:13 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:33:04 +0100 (BST)
Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone any advice on how to build the Reference Card[1] from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:18:34 +0200
Source: libtool
Binary: libtool-doc libltdl3 libtool libltdl3-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.5.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:28:46 +
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.128-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:29:32PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Another criterion is that it's built on all the architectures the
previous version in testing is built on. It seems it's missing builds on
^^^
That should be unstable.
Anyway, the list of reasons why it
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:59:53AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello,
Lucas just rebuilt the archive with my new dpkg-shlibdeps and the symbols
file that I provided him
(http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/symbols.tar.bz2) and that I
auto-generated.
The resulting Packages file is here:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2007 at 17:50:26 +, Oleg Verych wrote:
Just as better alternative IMHO, please consider using `eu-readelf -ds`
from elfutils.
elfutils isn't build-essential. binutils is, and does the job, so it's
better
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij
Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question
if support sparc32 should be
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2007-05-18 Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask kindly for support regarding bug #424644 because
I do not own any amd64 and thus feel unable to solve this problem.
Any hints / patches?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:41:35 +0200
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.127-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:41 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Several, according to the table at:
http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/testing/docs/2.html#1
I've tested with ircd-hybrid, but it should also do ircd-ircu and
ircd-irc2
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:12:01 +0200
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.127-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:48:57 +0200
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.127-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:02:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 12:32:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:15:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
If there are concerns over archive size, why don't we drop all static
.a libraries at the same
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
2007/5/7, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Mike Hommey:
Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
a good thing.
I think the
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Version : 2.1a (2007-04-10)
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell
Description : Generic library
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:59:46 +0200
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.127-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote:
Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins,
beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl.
Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 04:40:45PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 22-Apr-07, 16:22 (CDT), Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because segfaults are often not easily reproduced. Having the ability to
analyse a crash that occured when the user did not have the -dbg
packages
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:15:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
If there are concerns over archive size, why don't we drop all static
.a libraries at the same time. Given that in Debian we typically
always link dynamically, is there a need for .a libraries in all but a
handful of cases?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:10:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
*If I want or need command xxzz, which packages can give me that?
You'll need to explore the packages website.
You mean the search page on packages.debian.org called
Search the contents of packages? Which just like apt-file
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:24:38PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Actually, I've considered adding hardware reporting to popcon, using a
separate question (or more options, not sure which), and hardware
reports do not need
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:01:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Neil Williams:
Which are the offending libraries?
Botan, Crypto++, BouncyCastle, a few Perl-related packages.
Openssl's README.Debian contains:
Some algorithms used in the library are covered by patents. As
a result, the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Michal ?iha? wrote:
Hi
__ gpg --homedir=. --keyring debian-keyring.gpg --keyring
debian-keyring.pgp --with-colons --list-keys 0x05C78623
pub:-:1024:17:DC3552E836E75604:2004-01-10:::-:Michal ?x8ciha?x99 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]::scESC:
[...]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:14:46AM +0100, Cai Qian wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upload pacakge to anonymous ftp master through passive FTP
method. However, I have always got the following error,
Check that you uploaded the binaries in binary mode and not in text
mode. I think I got that
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:40:48 +0100
Source: openntpd
Binary: openntpd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.9p1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ntp- Network Time Protocol daemon and utility programs
ntp-doc- Network Time Protocol documentation
ntp-refclock - transition package
ntp-simple - transition package
ntpdate- client for setting system time from NTP
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Frank B. Brokken wrote:
Dear Steve Langasek, you wrote:
The intention here is to use size_t in situations where the value is known
to be non-negative.
I don't see any reason why you should use size_t for that instead of
unsigned int.
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:57:31 +
Source: libid3tag
Binary: libid3tag0-dev libid3tag0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.15.1b-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mad Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:46:12 +
Source: libid3tag
Binary: libid3tag0-dev libid3tag0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.15.1b-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Mad Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 10:56:33PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:25:31PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:35, Claus Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Rescue mode needs MD devices
The rescue mode of the installer needs a
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:37:56PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Hi,
I'm packaging a database wrapper library (http://oss.devit.com/yada/).
Its purpose is to provide one single API to a program and let the user
configure if the database used is actually postgres/mysql/sqlite. The
actual
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:44:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
If it's using dlopen(), you probably want to depend on the -dev packages,
unless you want to hardcode the complete name of the library instead of
the soname. It probably already breaks if they're not installed.
Of course soname
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:17:06AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Namely, fix bug #224469. It's really trivial and it's been waiting
for over three years now. This is just STUPID.
Next DPL election, I want to see someone running on the platform of
adding an extra ftpmaster *whether or not
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:20:30AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
An arm buildd maintainer not reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] is simply not
doing his job as buildd maintainer. You can't pretend to be the one
handling builds for the whole archive while not following discussions
around problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:07:17 +0100
Source: elfutils
Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.123-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries,
libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and
libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: languagetool
Version: 0.8.6
Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0
Description: A rule-based language
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should
call the binary libtorrent10.
Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep
SONAME
The real soname is
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:52:40PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will
start to look for a file called /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10. That will
probably be a symlink in your case to libtorrent-0.11.0, which looks
rather
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:50:29PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Martin Zobel-Helas]
gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1 (gpg --export -a A70DAF536070D3A1 |
apt-key add -)
Uh, don't forget the part about verifying that the key is actually
signed by the ftpmasters. Skipping that step
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 09:05:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 19, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to receive comments about:
- shipping /etc/networks in netbase
- adding 169.254.0.0 to it
The second makes sense to me.
I am not sure. For a start, I would need to
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM -0800, Richard A Nelson wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, John Kelly wrote:
I don't need NFS with sendmail. Surely flock() is not *still* broken
in 2.6 kernels?
I doubt that flock is *still* broken - that was quite some time ago...
From the flock manpage:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:27:13PM +, John Kelly wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:09:33 +0100, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyway, from the linux/Documentation/locks.txt file:
1.2.1 Typical Problems - Sendmail
-
Because sendmail was unable to use
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:03:00PM +, John Kelly wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:54:13 +0100, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I actually see no good reason to want to use flock() over fcntl().
Maybe because the fcntl()
interface follows the completely stupid semantics of System
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
When using bts show package or going to
http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find
both of them annoying.
I switched the default to appending dist=untable because
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Hi all!
Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show
(aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so.
[...]
It now resolves to:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Some other thing it does now is that if I file a bug against a
package before the bts knows about it, it shows up as in other
versions or something.
You should be hard pressed to be able to actually install packages
before
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certificate
provided by ca-certificates the certificate has a link to /usr/share/..
and the hash has a link
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certificate
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:41 -0800, Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have a SA rule for this run now, but sending such hints to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will get them seen
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:03:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Next, I removed clauses that said that all the requirements of
policy must be met for a package to be in main or contrib; we know
that is not true.
I have replaced some uses of the word must when it was
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:49:03PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
p
- Packages involving shared libraries should be split up into
+ Packages involving shared libraries ought to be split up into
several binary packages. This section mostly deals with how
this separation
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:34:11PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
I have started to wonder a bit about 'missing days' - a thing that is
especially importaint now when we are heading for a total freeze.
From http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html:
Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:06:37 +
Source: tar
Binary: tar
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.15.91-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:40:04AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
A number of packages currently fail to build with:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lglib-2.0
Can someone please investigate whether this is a bug in those packages
or some underlying problem and file bugs. I've put some buid
-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libssl0.9.7 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.7-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
Changes:
openssl097 (0.9.7k-3) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fix patch for CVE-2006-2940, it left ctx unintiliased.
Files:
1c3b2f3d87442c8e310b3ccab95e6831 755
Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libcrypto0.9.8-udeb - crypto shared library - udeb (udeb)
libssl-dev - SSL development libraries, header files and documentation
libssl0.9.8 - SSL shared libraries
libssl0.9.8-dbg - Symbol tables for libssl and libcrypt
501 - 600 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
