: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius
Description:
python-coverage-test-runner - fail Python program unit tests unless they test
everything
python3-coverage-test-runner - fail Python program unit tests unless they test
everything
Changes:
python-coverage-test-runner (1.13.1-2) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 23:24:43 +0200
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp python3-cliapp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.20180812.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Lars
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 23:23:28 +0200
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.32-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius
Description:
cmdtest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 19:02:28 +0200
Source: vmdb2
Binary: vmdb2
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius
Description:
vmdb2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 18:27:45 +0200
Source: python-ttystatus
Binary: python-ttystatus python3-ttystatus
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.38-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Lars
Tollef Fog Heen :
> (I also wonder if we should just require people to opt in to their
> DD-ship on a yearly basis instead of doing most of the WAT/MIA dance. If
> people can't be bothered to reply to a single email saying «yup, another
> year please» with some reasonable amount of pinging and
The problem: when a .deb package is installed, upgraded, or removed,
the maintainer scripts are run as root and can thus do anything.
Sometimes what they do is an unwelcome surprise to the user. For
example, the Microsoft Skype .deb and the Google Chrome .deb add to
the APT sources lists and APT
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:21:11AM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> I think my solution is correct, because Swift works with any init system
> and I want to only say "it doesn't work with older systemd". I don't think
> it's correct to list all possible init systems in Depends.
Would Conflicts work
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The src:linux package has a very big changelog (about 1700 kiB
> uncompressed, 600 kiB gzipped). On my system the largest installed
> changelogs, by some way, are all versions of this. (The next largest
> changelogs come from
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 11:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> A previous iteration on this was
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722898
A modern SSD can write hundreds of megabytes per second, and contains on
the order of a terabyte. Older SSDs are smaller, but slower. Rotating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 15:22:03 +0300
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp python3-cliapp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20180812.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.4.2
On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 23:24 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I notice that the autopkgtest man pages still reference vmdebootstrap,
> specifically autopkgtest-virt-qemu.1:
>
> > BUILDING IMAGES
> >Debian
> >For Debian you can use vmdebootstrap(8) to
I've recently made the first release of ick, my CI engine
(https://ick.liw.fi/), which was built by ick itself. It went OK, but
the process needs improvement. This mail has some pondering on how
the process of building Debian packages should happen in the best
possible taste.
I'd appreciate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 09:26:24 +0300
Source: vmdb2
Binary: vmdb2
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:07:58 +0300
Source: vmdebootstrap
Binary: vmdebootstrap
Architecture: source
Version: 1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzen
I feel like performing cruel acts on a previously viable equine
entity.
On Sun, 2018-04-22 at 14:56 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think this is not really desirable. It would be much better to make
> the syntax a subset of 5322, at least.
I think we should make this easy on ourselves. Let's
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 11:16 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> No, users and, I suspect, a large part of admins and developers cannot
> easily say which of two codenames is newer, and it doesn't matter what are
> those two codenames. Numeric versions are usually used to help with this,
> but not
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 04:07 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 03:33:48 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > apt show $PACKAGE
> >
> > There's no need to duplicate the information inside .dsc/.deb and apt
> > indices.
>
> Do you realize that the point of the repository (not apt :)
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 15:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm not sure now if this also has been said before, but I'm happy to
> repeat it in any case. :) I'd very strongly object to completely moving
> those fields out of the source packages, because it means when you get
> or have a source
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:58 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit I do not agree with this and it was discussed here before. Can
> we please agree that anonscm.debian.org remains a valid URL and stop
> starting another round of package uploads for the sake of changing Vcs
> fields.
I'm repeating
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> In this longish thread I have read one contribution where a developer
> expressed that he was happy about checking his SONAME bumped package
> that was erroneous and luckily ftpmaster found the problem.
I'm happy that the ftp masters are
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 00:30 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:27:40PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
> > > causes RC bugs to pop up. I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
> > > team, but
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 14:51 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > In many cases, there is an issue open about the new binary package
>
> (In my experience, there is not.)
>
> > When there is no bug report open at all, well, bad luck.
>
> Well, possbibly, but if one is investing time and
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 22:05 -0600, Steve Robbins wrote:
> I assume that the reason my packages have been processed is due to one
> > of two reasons: a) I get quoted on LWN several times a year, so I'm a
> > celebrity and get special treatment
>
> I expect that's it.
For the avoidance of doubt,
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 13:51 +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> How do you want to achieve this with a source package that has 13k+
> source files and where upstream does not provide a standard license
> header for each file? I.e. there is some license text and it needs to
> be quoted, but licensecheck
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 13:00 +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> as the one who is the uploader of the package that is currently longest
> in the NEW pipeline (vtk7), I'd like to make a proposal how
> transparency and also the interaction from non ftp-master members to
> review packages could be improved.
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 11:59 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> It seems ftp masters are literally the masters with only a GR powerful
> enough to over turn their decisions. See
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881339#55
This seems correct, from my reading of the Debian
org>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Description:
vmdebootstrap - Bootstrap Debian into a (virtual machine) disk image
Changes:
vmdebootstrap (1.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add NEWS.Debian to warn about vmdebootstrap going away.
Checksums-Sha1:
d928557c8bf21484430407d70db1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:05:32 +0200
Source: vmdb2
Binary: vmdb2
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 09:59:34 +0200
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: source
Version: 0.32-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l.
I don't have an opinion on whether this should be done on Debian
servers or not, but I have a comment on providing security support for
more than a decade. How do you plan to deal with the kernel? Do you
expect to backport security fixes to the wheezy kernel, or upgrade the
kernel to newer
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 18:52 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 14 février 2018 16:09 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> :
>
> > > > It's not only an infrastructure problem. If you Depends on X (>= 1.8),
> > > > this will be true with X 1:1.6 as well.
...
&
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 11:54 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > It's not only an infrastructure problem. If you Depends on X (>= 1.8),
> > this will be true with X 1:1.6 as well.
>
> Only if your program is severely buggy.
>
> Hint: either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:56:41 +0200
Source: vmdb2
Binary: vmdb2
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
* Package name: vmdb2
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
* URL : https://github.com/larswirzenius/vmdb2
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: Python
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:31 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask*
> > when unsure or uncertain of something.
> > So, in fact, the epoch bump was totally useless, and
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 11:10 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> In general I agree with this as a DD, but when I wear my user hat I don't.
I disagree, I'm afraid. As a user, the speed in which we do removals
from testing or unstable shouldn't matter to you. What matters is that
the software you need
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 08:37 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote...
>
> > Thus, I'd like to propose a new kind of wnpp bug: "Intent To Remove".
>
> Sounds like a very good idea. For me, I could automatically parse these
> and check against the list of packages installed on my
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:00 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Both tools create a Debian OS and use a Jinja config which allows
> specifying individual steps. Can the forces be joined?
One is in Go, one in Python. There's nothing similar in the code bases.
I see no chance of "joining forces", nor
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:44:24PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 1/3/18, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Moreover, defining an official nosystemd profile in Debian signals that we
> > are willing to support it, which means any maintainers who refuse such
> > patches will
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:33:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> These statements are not in contradiction. Saying "this package complies
> with policy version X" doesn't say anything about what version of policy the
> package *should* comply with. Our tooling should absolutely be optimized
>
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's
> > git repos. And that's one of the reasons I moved all my packaging to
> > my own server some time ago.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:27:18 +0200
Source: python-ttystatus
Binary: python-ttystatus python3-ttystatus
Architecture: source
Version: 0.38-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
C
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:33:07PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Just because software comes pre-installed doesn't mean it is free. And
> if it is also impossible to replace the software you also can't update
> it with a free version so the user has even less freedom than when you
> can replace
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:01:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> That's still not an upstream default lsm. Looks like someone in
> Debian just decided to make apparmor the default, which is horrible
> news :(
Hello, Christoph,
do you think you could manage to either point the general -devel
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:10:20AM +, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Currently, as far as I can tell, sudo is build without PC_INSULTS. We
> should probably rename the sudo package to sudo-offensive.
>
> This option is defined in the source code as "Define to 1 to replace
> politically incorrect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:30:11 +0100
Source: python-ttystatus
Binary: python-ttystatus python3-ttystatus
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.37-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
C
org>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Description:
vmdebootstrap - Bootstrap Debian into a (virtual machine) disk image
Closes: 874525
Changes:
vmdebootstrap (1.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version
* Add Steve to Uploaders. He did two NMUs and is willing. Drop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 10:22:16 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp python3-cliapp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20170827-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:54:02 +0300
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp python3-cliapp
Architecture: all source
Version: 1.20170823-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
C
Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Description:
python3-coverage-test-runner - fail Python program unit tests unless they test
everything
python-coverage-test-runner - fail Python program unit tests unless they test
everything
Changes:
python-coverage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:30:00 +0300
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:42:09PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 15 May 2017 at 13:30, Paul Wise wrote:
> > TBH if I was confronted with the new LXDE web design with CSS turned
> > on, I would probably just close the page. The old page is way more
> > informative and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
* Package name: sparseutils
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Richard Ipsum <richardip...@fastmail.co.uk>
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sparseutils/
* License : GPL3+
Prog
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:59:30AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:16:18PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:35:46PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: Bug#860170: node-brfs -- browserify fs.readFileSync() static
> > > asset
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Sharing with wider debian community, hoping to get some support.
I'm afraid I cannot give my support to this. I'm not involved with
release management, so this is just one rando developer's opinion.
> Current version in unstable
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:30:44AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Lars Wirzenius:
>
> > A compication in this is that even though the developers of a program
> > would be happy with linking to OpenSSL, people who've written other
> > libraries the program uses
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:09:20AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Well, that's really new to me. Why would you object to link to OpenSSL?
I'm not sure how to respond to this.
I don't understand why it is new to you. The conflict between the
OpenSSL and GPL licences is well known, at least within
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:14:25AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> As Carlos, it's hard for me to believe anyone will object to OpenSSL
> linking, all the more when they implemented the support for it.
A compication in this is that even though the developers of a program
would be happy with
(Reply-to points at me, I doubt there's any need for much discussion.
If you disagree, tweak you headers accodingly.)
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:06:17PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:00:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > From: Lee Garrett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 09:19:14 +0100
Source: python-cliapp
Binary: python-cliapp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20160724-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzen
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Sorry, my e-mail was poorly worded. I'd like to know why Lars thinks
> that they are not sufficiently free.
I don't want to spend much time on this (there are backups to make and
test) so I'll just link to the infinitely wise
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:16:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On തിങ്കള് 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the
> > company?
> >
>
> git.fosscommunity.in is running Gitlab C
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:57:46PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> The entire idea of that instance is to make a 100% Free Software public
> git hosting service available to the Free Software community.
Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the
company?
--
I want to build
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:50:57AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
> > I agree with the principle that test failures should be RC by default.
>
> This is something which seems to have no disagreement here. My concern
> is just that I want to have a
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Python 3.6 isn't even in experimental yet
This bit was wrong. 3.6 is in experimental. That doesn't change my
point about a transition being too late now, however.
--
I want to build worthwhile things that might last. --jo
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Galbo Branbert wrote:
> I couldn't find any official statement if Python 3.6 will be the default
> interpreter in stretch (as it was the current stable when the soft freeze
> happened it should be, right?)
Python 3.6 was released 23 December. The stretch
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 12:04:54PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Now we can't be the Universal OS, no matter what we do :-)
Distro development is difficult, let's go shopping.
Sarcasm aside, here's a summary of the situation, as I understand it.
tldr: let's not despair, we have a mostly
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:17:01PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> In my opinion ip provides all the things you are mentioning - what are
> you missing? with -o as option the output is rather easy to parse.
I find ip's output hard to read. I have to take time to visually parse
it every time, I
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:30:26AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> OK, you can remove the last half, but keep in mind there are plenty of
> people who aren't using the exotic features provided by iproute2, and
> are very happy using the more convenient and shorter BSD-style
> commands. If you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:11:54 +0200
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.21-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:39:34 +0200
Source: python-ttystatus
Binary: python-ttystatus
Architecture: source
Version: 0.34-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:19:42 +0100
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:56:53AM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> A package to get user home path ?
> The world is dying...
We've had a number of discussions about nodejs's approach to what is a
suitable library/package size. Can we please not have that again?
--
I want to build worthwhile
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:55:48AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I fail to see the relation to http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/ - can you
> explain?
It's a benign acronym collision: both Debian and Django define DEP:
ours is Debian enhancement proposal, their is Django enhancement
proposal. See
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:54:08AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> writes:
>
> > If I understand this correctly, Django wants to gather usage
> > statistics from installed Django instances, in a way that they say
> > respects user privacy (tho
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:23:24AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> FTAOD: I thank the release team for their tireless work on making each
> Debian release better than the last. We keep on adding more and more
> software and making things harder and harder to stabilise and release,
> and I 100%
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:05:18PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> https://github.com/django/deps/pull/31
If I understand this correctly, Django wants to gather usage
statistics from installed Django instances, in a way that they say
respects user privacy (though I failed to understand how, given a
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:59:34AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> That is really really bad. I really hoped back in 2015 that you were
> joking when you announced that.
It's really, really good. I was really glad that it isn't a joke.
I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:47:28PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> One of the topics that we've been talking about yesterday is automatic
> software upgrades of cloud images. Some of the cloud platform
> providers really want this so that unsophisticated / inexperienced
> users of Debian images on
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:04:26PM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 17:54, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I see the following possibilities now:
> >
> > a) You rename the yarn package manager in Debian (both package and
> >binary). I keep the yarn name
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 15:28, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > The JS package manager called yarn is quite new. It wouldn't be
> > unreasonable to suggest to them to rename it to avoid a naming
> > conflict, in my opinion.
>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Fine, I have opened an "Issue" in the github tracker, let's see if this
> is received constructively:
> https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/1656
Thank you.
--
I want to build worthwhile things that might last. --joeyh
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:02:31PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I searched github for `yarn'.
You don't find my software on github. I do not want to rely on
non-free services like github.
> There are lots of hits for other
> programs, including:
> - a dialogue editor (for games, I think)
> -
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:32:14PM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> cmdtest provides yarn since this commit:
> http://git.liw.fi/cgi-bin/cgit/cgit.cgi/cmdtest/commit/?id=859bb5ba9631df883dd7b074ff649ea2ca76e1ad
Yep, in 0.27-1, uploaded Sep 21 this year. cmdtest has included the
yarn program since
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:36:21AM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Package name: yarn
> URL: https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn
My cmdtest package provides yarn, since the main tool it now provides
is yarn (a testing tool), not cmdtest. Perhaps your package could be
called yarnpkg?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:46:18 +0200
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:25:37 +0300
Source: obnam
Binary: obnam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> If that is the case then they have enbedded hostility into their name simply
> becaus eit offends normal grammar roles.
I don't that's it at all.
The reason many people react to the SystemD spelling is becuase, for
some years now, trolls use
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:03:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The WTFness of this code is certainly way above what we're normally used to,
> but (AIUI) it's only used as a fallback for nodejs < 4. Debian currently has
> 4.6.0.
In that case, perhaps this package isn't needed in Debian at all?
> >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:40:49PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I don't particularly enjoy doing this either. Please direct your anger
> at the nodejs developers. I'm doing this only because the packages I
> care (diaspora and gitlab won't be accepted in main, unless I build
> libjs-handlebars
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:59:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> > into Debian until it's fixed.
>
> I agree this could be marked RC a
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:49:27PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> > into Debian until it's fixed.
>
> This is already reported upstream
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> The code, well...
>
> if (process.platform === 'linux') {
> return home || (process.getuid() === 0 ? '/root' : (user ?
> '/home/' + user : null));
> }
>
> Things are more complicated than that. What
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:36:56PM +0800, SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
> Although these packages are not API-compatible, they are using the
> same installation path and file name; therefore, I think "Conflict:"
> section is needed.
The problem with this is that this prevents our users from having both
of
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:55:39PM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> I'd say that those who can discern Debian non-free from Debian
> proper are at low risk of confusing, say, [1] with the "software
> [...] endorsed or even produced by Debian."
http://ftp.se.debian.org/ and
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:50:46AM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Doesn’t the presence of the ‘non-free’ section in the official
> Debian Release (InRelease) files /already/ mislead inexperienced
> people into thinking that such software is either part of Debian
> or endorsed
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:49:14AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> node-iconv used to be able to translit utf-8 chars (ça va) to ascii (ca va)
> using setlocale("C.UTF-8") trick.
>
> However, several libc6 version ago, that behavior changed, to the point
> node-iconv fails its tests now.
>
> I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:32:41 +0300
Source: cmdtest
Binary: cmdtest
Architecture: source
Version: 0.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi>
Changed-By: Lars Wirzenius <l.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Because you think people will not be frustrated if they experience a bug and
> that we prevent them to raise bugs? Hiding reality is always bad?. Look at the
> original reporter last message. He seems quite disappointed by the
1 - 100 of 1011 matches
Mail list logo