Ian Murdock writes:
ther have to have separate Incoming directories for all
supported architectures, or we'll have to have a naming scheme for all
Incoming binary packages (prepending a dash and the architecture name,
for example) that can be easily resolved before the packages are moved.
Bill Mitchell writes:
The most reasonable approach seems to me (of course) to be the one
which I've been arguing -- a naming standard very close to current
practice, minimizing package renaming, and minimizing mangling of
upstream naming and versioning.
Let me throw another idea in the pot. A
David Engel writes:
3. /etc/rc[0-6].d will move to /etc/rc.d/rc[0-6].d to match the
practice on other Linux systems. Symbolic links will provide
compatibility with the old locations.
Is this really necessary ? Real SysV's do things the way we have
done.
I can make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Leslie writes:
Robert I don't know about other mirrors, but AFAICT tsx-11.mit.edu
Robert doesn't even carry the 0.93R6 release any more. It only offers
Robert debian-1.0.
It's getting jucier by the minute:
This domain has a local wuarchive mirror.
4 matches
Mail list logo
