Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Description:
liblockfile-bin - support binaries for and cli utilities based on liblockfile
liblockfile-dev - Development library for liblockfile
liblockfile1 - NFS-safe locking library
Closes: 933104
Changes:
liblockfile (1.16
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg
Description:
liblockfile-bin - support binaries for and cli utilities based on liblockfile
liblockfile-dev - Development library for liblockfile
liblockfile1 - NFS-safe locking library
Changes:
liblockfile (1.15-1) unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:05:49 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:45:06 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:46:01 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:46:41 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:02:00 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:07:17 +0100
Source: elvis-tiny
Binary: elvis-tiny
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4-24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miqu...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Miqu
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Parted Maintainer Team parted-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu...@debian.org
Description:
libparted0 - disk partition manipulator - dummy package
libparted0-dev - disk partition manipulator - development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:13:28 +0200
Source: elvis-tiny
Binary: elvis-tiny
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4-23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu...@debian.org
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:27:57 +0200
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.09-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:18:46 +0200
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.09-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:44:10 +0200
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 19:02 -0400, James Vega wrote:
tag 528494 help
thanks
#528494 raised the idea of having vim-tiny (the default vi-like editor
on a base install) provide /bin/vi so that it would be accessible in
situations where /usr isn't available. At first glance, I naïvely
figured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:43:18 +0200
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.08-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:05:37 +0200
Source: elvis-tiny
Binary: elvis-tiny
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4-22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:45:21 +0200
Source: elvis-tiny
Binary: elvis-tiny
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4-21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:37:11AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This works at least on 2.6. [...]
This means that /var/run is always writable.
That's really quite nice. I wonder if requiring 2.6 is even much
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
/var/run has always been the right place in the namespace; it's just
not been usable for technical reasons. If we fix the technical reasons,
all is good.
Well there is on more technical solution that might have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:58:47 +0100
Source: elvis-tiny
Binary: elvis-tiny
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
Ok, now what's the problem...
The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Steve Langasek [Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:03:21 -0700]:
Hrm. If this information is all just being copied to the real
filesystem at the end of the boot process anyway, why does it need to
write it out to disk instead of just
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marc Chantreux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are a lot of things in /etc/init.d/*, and {pre,post}inst
scripts that can be rewritten more efficiently ( i think ).
for example, in /etc/init.d/mysqld
mysqld_get_param() {
/usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults \
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
GOMBAS Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:05:43PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Single-user mode is a fiasco, because in /etc/rcS.d/* there are a number
of services that really should not belong there. Examples:
-network
-all
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.07.1403 +0200]:
Why are you so much worried about the envelope sender, when it is
usually forged? You are not trying to bounce messages that you
didn't want to receive
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
A silly question to you as release manager:
Silly indeed. Use the list archives. You cannot miss the monstruous threads
about it.
What exactly are the technical reasons
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
mirrors due to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not let people choose what they want to use woody sarge or sid
and never change the names again. I think lots of people are happy with
how things work now. No need to ever do a release again. Just remove the
old/arcane
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Otto Wyss]
I've set the s attrtibute of halt since on my desktop any user may
stop the system. But about each second month or so it's set back to
it's original rights probably by a package upgrade. Is there a way to
keep
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stopping releasing might be a good idea but there should be a better
way. IMO the problem is the stable release isn't updated on a regulare
basis. It might be a better idea to divide Debian into subsystems which
could be released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:04:18 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.86.ds1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:51:32 -0600, Steve Greenland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16-Dec-04, 08:04 (CST), Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take for example a web application like a forum. It requires the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:36:21AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
In addition, we have at least two other machines which are available
to developers:
pergolesi.debian.org -- admin is debian-admin (and all developers have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:57:34 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.86-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:59:08 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.86-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:17:05 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.86-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 12:40:12 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:43:55 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:18:08 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:45:12 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:51:46 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 14:38:55 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:03:33 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:07:24 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:10:48 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:55:38 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:29:53 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.85-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:04:06 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.85-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:16:14 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.85-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:11:20 +0100
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.85-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:20:05 +0100
Source: nis
Binary: nis
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I sometimes switch to my old 2.4 for testing purposes. Then of
course mounting /sys will fail and the user will get an error
message (it doesn't harm, though). This problem could only be
circumvented by not mounting /sys
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:30, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:59:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:41, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I was wondering how to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Without having evaluated null hypotheses or done exhaustive analyses,
the correlation nevertheless seems fairly convincing. To put it bluntly,
our regular package maintainers are doing such a bad job that without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:05:52 +0100
Source: nis
Binary: nis
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 15, Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry: http://www.linux.it/~md/software/ssd.tgz .
Should that go into /sbin/init itself, so that you can boot with
initcaps=eip,cap_setpcap+eip on the command line
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think dpkg-statoverride is not too bad in this case. I'll talk to
the nis package maintainer and see if that's acceptable. If not, nis
could install some flag file. The unix_chkpwd could start with root
privs, chuck for this
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think dpkg-statoverride is not too bad in this case. I'll talk to
the nis package maintainer and see if that's acceptable. If not, nis
could install
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 15, Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if i enable SETPCAP for init, will init drop that capability? Will it
pass it to all started programs?
See http://www.linux.it/~md/ssd.tgz .
No kernel hacks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:45:03 +0100
Source: nis
Binary: nis
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:50:05AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:15, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or do you have to be root for getpwnam() to work on NIS accounts?
In
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cistron begat FreeRADIUS. FreeRADIUS is certainly actively maintained
upstream. xtRADIUS is also begat of Cistron. I'd assumed that Cistron
is dead upstream too, and xtRADIUS active.
Cistron radius is not dead. It's just in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tobias Wolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-11-10T17:28:10+0100 (Monday), François TOURDE wrote:
Runlevels are distro dependants. Debian default is 2. Red Hat, for
example is 2-text login, 3-[x|g|?]dm graphic login.
I had to retrofit my runlevels with the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first beta release of debian-installer, the
new installation system for sarge.
We want screenshots!
Mike.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
However, if you read the paper in http://people.d.o/~hmh, and implement the
demultiplexer, we could probably modify one of the above methods to work
well, while we
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SMTP AUTH is no magic solution, you'd have to start routing mail by
sender instead of recipient.
Take myself, sharing a computer at home with somebody else who uses a
completely different domain for her e-mail. Currently I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, there is a difference between Envelope-From (SMTP MAIL FROM:)
and whatever you put in the From: header. They don't have to be the same.
[...]
I do know that, but e.g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:11:59 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
.
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:43:07 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:43:07 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:48:11 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
I'm trying to run debootstrap to see if it plays nice with sysvinit.
And the other way around.
But at the moment, it bails out because it wants to install
libident which still is in the potato part of the archive ...
and my local mirror doesn't carry dists/potato anymore.
There's a handful of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Tobias Wolter wrote:
I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an attitude like this is going
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tobias Wolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+ (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the
maintainer is cooperation at work. NOT.
Between pissing off a maintainer and leaving
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tobias Wolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. From my point of view, it's an acceptable step out of bounds.
For me it isn't.
I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
possible recently due to sysvinit.
I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU.
I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work.
Yes, NMUing essential
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:08:09 +0200
Source: sysvinit
Binary: sysv-rc sysvinit initscripts
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.85-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:27:58 +0200
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile-dev liblockfile1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.05
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Miquel van
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:12:00AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
It seems that currently apt is not able to replace an essential
package. Well in fact the package I am trying to replace isn't
even really essential...
It is able to, as you
Before I file a bugreport I thought I'd ask here first ..
It seems that currently apt is not able to replace an essential
package. Well in fact the package I am trying to replace isn't
even really essential...
Sysvinit was split up in sysvinit, initscripts and sysv-rc. The last
one can be
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:12:00AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Sysvinit was split up in sysvinit, initscripts and sysv-rc. The last
one can be replaced by file-rc. Sysv-rc and file-rc conflict and
replace one
I have split up sysvinit into three packages:
- sysvinit
- initscripts
- sysv-rc
This is so that BSD and the Hurd can easier replace just the parts
they need, probably just initscripts and sysv-rc, and so that
alternative systems like file-rc can be dropped in easier.
Initscripts now contains
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possible -- sure, but not useful except as an option for the initial
bootstrap that might not fully work with /lib64.
I've followed both SuSE and Red Hat making that mistake with their early
s390x distributions. They both now
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
JPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something that has always bothered me about the scripts in
`/etc/init.d'. Every once in a while I attempt to execute one of these
scripts while logged in as a non-root user.
This is Unix. It gives you enough rope to hang
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ari Makela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:23:24PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
As far as I know most keyboards don't have an AltGr key..
In North America that's probably correct (what would they do with it?)
but it's essential with European
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, everyone agrees. This has been hashed over and over and over. Talking
about it doesn't help. Solve the problem.
Debian is too big.
Split it up in 'core' (must fit easily on one CD) and 'added value'
(the other 21 CDs).
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Dier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best one is where microsoft put their symbol in
'iso-8859-1'-cp1252-winlatin1, which is in 80, instead of a4 where
iso-8859-15 puts it. What does most codepages use? 80 or A4? Does
iso-8859-1 even have anything in 80? Is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to see more user feedback on Debian's settings of the
VIM editor. Currently, two important features are disabled in the
default configurations: Syntax highlighting and special intending
schemes. The question is: why?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Othmar Pasteka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to announce that the Netwinder debussy.debian.org is upgraded
and again available for every Debian developer. The upgrade took
longer than expected, but it's finally done.
% ssh debussy.debian.org
Creating home
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People should not be using them, but if they do, they should use a
kernel-headers package, and not rely on the headers in libc6-dev which
are different on all archs, and change almost every new glibc build. You
are never
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tinguaro Barreno Delgado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I maintain a rsync mirror of potato and woody (i386) and this week the
distribution has lost +50 packages. They aren't in ftp.debian.org (I'm
rsyncing from ftp.de.debian.org). Can anyone explain this?
Yes. The
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
to provide enhanced
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Darren/Torin/Who Ever... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Collins, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:46:02AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
Is there some set of defines such that I can determine with #ifdef that
I've got a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Henrique M Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's an updated version of the RFC text, as well as a new version of the
initscriptquery reference script. The fragments.sh script is included just
for completeness, and was not modified.
I like it, but why not fold
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. get an ISP that can do reverse DNS. YEESHHH! I'll happily bounce
their mail until then.
Are you willing to pay the difference between the cost of that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:44:06PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
A server on the 'net without matching forward/reverse DNS is broken.
Period.
Complete bullshit. Show me the RFC that says you may only have one DNS
name
On http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/developers.loc , there's supposed
to be a jpeg of a world map with debian developers. On the main
website, www.debian.org, there is.
It seems that the .nl webserver is interpreting the filename
developers.map.jpeg as a .map image-map file according to this error:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are too many boot messages, and they sometimes scroll too
fast. It would be nice to log all the output from the boot
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote:
The ballots came from:
216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active
developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al...
If that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With those two keys you usually will type 'u' and then 'f' in aptitude to
reset it to its default working mode. In that mode you have a list of:
If you have a packe selected, you will get information about it in the
status
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
