-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:24:08 +1100
Source: libgearman-client-async-perl
Binary: libgearman-client-async-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.94-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:14:36 +1000
Source: libgearman-client-async-perl
Binary: libgearman-client-async-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.94-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:35:23 +1000
Source: gearman-server
Binary: gearman-server
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:14:50 +1000
Source: libgearman-client-perl
Binary: libgearman-client-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:13:35 +1000
Source: libio-aio-perl
Binary: libio-aio-perl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
--
Pascal Hakim +61 4 0341 1672
Debian Listmaster
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:47:00 +1000
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:47:00 +1000
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
that looked
liked this. I can't forsee this having changed.
Pasc
(with his non-razor-bladed listmaster hat on)
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Salut,
Est-ce que quelqu'un comptait rajouter une entrée .fr sur:
http://wiki.debian.org/Debian13th ?
Pasc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:30:05 +1000
Source: pflogsumm
Binary: pflogsumm
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
be possible to mark mails as spam without going
to the website of the archive.
What happens if someone fakes a message-id?
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
could be an idea?
And while we're at it:
zh_CN 1971 (19%)
Chinese, as spoken in China
and
zh_TW 1905 (18%)
Chinese, as spoken in Taiwan
is kind of strange as well.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
. This is more useful than just running popcon. If
your computer is turned off, you'll be missing things like log rotation
and your locate database, as well as all your man pages stuff.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
, and
didn't run because the computer wasn't on.
Cheers,
Pasc (with his I'm the anacron maintainer hat on)
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
What has
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 06:25 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Don Armstrong]
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that.
Sounds good. But since this information was already
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 00:33 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
anymore? Sort of greylisting?
Sounds good.
It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
made the decision that they don't want
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply
that to work.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rarely if most of people (and DD) start signing their
submissions, and 3rd one will hit with probably 1% false positives...
Sending verification letters like that is a rather bad idea. We're
talking in the 10,000 to 100,000 verification emails a day here.
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
Placing a footer in list traffic is a compromise between modifying
messages as little as possible and trying to help people find a way
to get their questions answered.
A bad compromise
to emails on this list).
View the raw source of such a disappearing unsub message email,
and you will see that the text is there.
Nope.
It doesn't include it in some cases where it knows it won't show.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:33:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 01:25 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:14:33AM -0400
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:09:17AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Pascal Hakim wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
I wonder what it's rule set is.
:0 fbw
* ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*base64
* ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*quoted-printable
| cat - footer.txt
The Message-ID: [EMAIL
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst:
What's painful about it?
I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
lists.debian.org significantly.
Not nearly as much as people who teergrub us. We can _really_ feel them.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:45 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's painful about it?
It stops a lot of viruses and spam, with no false positives. What's the
problem?
No false positives seems a bit optimistic.
One problem I've encountered in the
gmail.com used to do that to lists.debian.org. We deliver ~300,000
emails to gmail a day. It resulted in some deliveries timing out before
they were even attempted; I'll let you imagine the rest.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Santiago Vila]
For
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Jeu 16 Juin 2005 14:33, Santiago Vila a crit :
Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin and
the Project Leader to consider seriously doing something to reduce
the level of spam we have to receive, store,
with the tools in stable. Note, I said manipulate, not
build.
Why can't you just install the unstable ones?
Because we don't run unstable on our project machines for a reason?
That's right. We use backports.org.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
Cheers,
Pasc
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 13:50 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
It really seems that such a list is
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 10:14 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:28:48PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
subscribers are
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 14:28 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar a crit :
I'm strongly in favour of a lists.debian.org, and I'm sure it'll be
created swiftly when we choose a sane name for it.
If possible, I also think that a lists.debian.org is better, and will
underline
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:08 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Pascal Hakim wrote:
Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
provide people with a place to discuss the packaging of web-apps
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:03 -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:09:37PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
retained by an mbox but not exposed to the web don't seem all that
objectionable, especially since the web archives don't munge email
addresses.
They might one day
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:09 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:55 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Pascal Hakim]
The reason it hasn't been done so far is not related to any technical
problem. There seems to be just as many people who do not want the
mboxes
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:26 +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists
available as mbox archives.
http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-)
Heh. Nice work.
You might want to obscure those a little bit.
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:20 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists
available as mbox archives.
The correct solution, until someone gets around to exporting the
mboxes, is to talk/grumble/whine about wanting the
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:55 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Pascal Hakim]
The reason it hasn't been done so far is not related to any technical
problem. There seems to be just as many people who do not want the
mboxes to be available as people who do.
Do these same people object to web
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 03:32 +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
snip
I'm not a debian developer, so i could not post on dda mailing list. I
had opened many thread over this months on debian-qa debian-devel about
dehs issues. The only reply are:
snip
If you're not a developer and you want to post on
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 13:35 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Clment Stenac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm interested in maintainership of PovRay.
I'm going to try to update the package to the latest upstream version
and to work on some of the bugs
That would be cool. At least one of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:08:00 +1100
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 9:50:00 +1100
Source: aladin
Binary: aladin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.19-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:55:54PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Pfft, constitution. Like that'll ever hold up in court.
Maybe they could put it in the preamble?
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim
Do Not Bend
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:50:44AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
Hi,
Who can tell me, where the debian-private list archives can be found?
Looks like they moved somewhere...
master:/home/debian/archive/debian-private/
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411
),
but not in the inboxes of subscribers.
There appears to be a large delay in the queue at the moment. There are
a couple of mail domains/ISPs causing us some issues, so expect to
receive mail late.
For example, that message made it in 30 hours later or so.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:52:00 +1000
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
(with his listmaster hat on)
[1]: http://lists.debian.org/whitelist
[2]: Listmasters get an email almost every week (and sometimes more
often) informing us that we should consider implementing some
type of spam filter on Debian lists.
[3]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Pascal Hakim
Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:09:00 +1000
Source: aladin
Binary: aladin
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.19-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:30:00 +1000
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:35:46 +1000
Source: ltris
Binary: ltris
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:30:00 +1000
Source: anacron
Binary: anacron
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:15:14 +
Source: libsnowpg-perl
Binary: libsnowpg-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:22:00 +1100
Source: aladin
Binary: aladin
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.19-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:59:08 +1100
Source: blosxom
Binary: blosxom
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
snort - Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System
snort-common - Flexible Network Intrusion Detection System
snort-doc - Documentation for the Snort IDS
snort-mysql - Flexible Network Intrusion Detection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:12:05 +1100
Source: pflogsumm
Binary: pflogsumm
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2003 23:20:03 +1100
Source: pflogsumm
Binary: pflogsumm
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:05:45 +1100
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 9708-36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:00:07AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
Right, just take Eray as an example (and note that the NM committee
agreed 100% with the DAM's decision; yet the DAM got all the blame).
Indeed you're right. To me we sohuld make things more open. Let's make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:19:00 +1100
Source: aladin
Binary: aladin
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.19-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:04:00 +1100
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 9708-35
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:53:23 +1000
Source: ipe
Binary: ipe libipe1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0pre10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:23:40 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-34
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:02:53 +1000
Source: povray
Binary: povray-doc povray povray-misc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.50c-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:22:46 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-33
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:08:59 +1000
Source: aladin
Binary: aladin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.19-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:28:15PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Why does a non-DD need to find
a DD to sign and forward the mail to dda? Why cant he sign it himself
and post it to the list? The message has to be approved by the moderator
anyway.
Mail to debian-devel-announce is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:07:00 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:21:29 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-32
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:33:04 +1000
Source: povray
Binary: povray-doc povray povray-misc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.50c-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:00:32 +1000
Source: ipe
Binary: ipe libipe1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0pre10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 22:38:08 +1000
Source: ipe
Binary: ipe libipe1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0pre10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:18:07 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:24:59 +1000
Source: fortune-mod
Binary: fortunes-min fortune-mod fortunes-off fortunes
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 9708-29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:40:16 +1000
Source: zangband
Binary: zangband
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.7.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:23:58 +1100
Source: zangband
Binary: zangband
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:40:23 +1100
Source: ltris
Binary: ltris
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:36:43 +1100
Source: libsnowpg-perl
Binary: libsnowpg-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:16:19 +1100
Source: ltris
Binary: ltris
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:51:24 +1100
Source: povray
Binary: povray-doc povray povray-misc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.50c-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:57:26 +1100
Source: povray
Binary: povray-doc povray povray-misc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.50c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:32:49 +1100
Source: newsclipper
Binary: newsclipper
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.32-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:07:16 +1100
Source: cvs2html
Binary: cvs2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.95-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:14:08 +1000
Source: ltris
Binary: ltris
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED
85 matches
Mail list logo
