Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Teichman
On 23 Apr 2001 20:58:57 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a package from libxml1 to libxml2 is quite easy, so

Re: gtk-doc vs glib1.2-dev info file conflict

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: I have the helix version installed: (Also this version should replace libgtk-doc, shouldn't it?) Whenever any helix packages are involved, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the appropriate place to report problems. Not debian-devel. #dpkg -s

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-09-05 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:29:32AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: I believe the infamous aalib affair actualy came out of a wishlist bugreport submitted to them by a user; the then frozen potato aalib was too low a version to meet all the helix dependencies. This meant people like me had to pull

Re: ITP: SkipStone

2000-09-05 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:03:07AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote: Skipstone is a GTK+ webbrowser that uses mozilla's embed features. It is similar to galeon only it is pure GTK+, no GNOME. The author asked me to make packages of it, and I have uploaded it into Debian. It is placed under the

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:02:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: No, there is no difference between our apps and the upstream in most cases. We do brand gnome-core and gdm, but those are the only packages I can think of offhand. Those are only graphics changes, substituting some of our

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: That is one mechanism of creating a private namespace, isn't another Setting the origin to something other than Debian? Please see elsewhere in this thread for my other

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: PT == Peter Teichman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] PT This solution looks like the best one. I'll start rebuilding our PT packages immediately. Don't forget to put this field in debian/control: Send-To: [EMAIL

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: 3) Libraries - All possible effort should be made to make Debian the primary source of libraries. Period full stop. This is so important because of what we are seeing with helix and their special library

Re: So whos going to ALS

1999-10-06 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 04:55:12PM -0400, Johnie Ingram wrote: ... and would be willing to help at the Debian booth (#503, community pavillion, check it out), or who knows good places to stay at in Atlanta? Or who wants to planepool with the Novare team from Dallas? I'll be there for the

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-10 Thread Peter Teichman
will be done very soon, and they should be notified anyway.. Peter -- Peter Teichman (Parenthetic Me) [EMAIL PROTECTED]