continued I found that you had already come up
them and that I just had to read on. In short, it seems well thought
out.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
As the target user for this sort of package is a sysadmin type, I
would saw it is an important enough detail that it should be in the
short description.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
are seeking, either in Debian proper, a derivative or in
an effort that you lead yourself.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
are simply ignorant or selectively ignoring reality. If you
hear someone make that complaint, kindly keep him (or her) from
sticking his (or her) foot too far down the throat and point them to
unstable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
because of RC bugs. So, if you want
packages moving into testing quicker, get the unstable version, test and
file bug reports when you find a bug and also try and submit patches to
the bugs that are already keeping it out of testing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
), but from the description it appears to be
somewhat outdated (eg Fedora Core 2).
Also, based on my experience trying to build a CentOS 3 chroot (CentOS 3
being fairly old at this point), it just doesn't work.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
would personally prefer to apt-get
install some Perl module, rather than install it myself from CPAN or
some other source. It makes life much easier when one manages many
machines.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
was a marketing gimmick.
Besides, there are other units of measure which carry the same name and
have different numerical values based on context (think statute miles
and nautical miles), though I don't think any such examples can be found
in the SI.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
defaulting to a close
approximation. Language is imperfect. People make do.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 12 juin 2007 à 03:29 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
It has never been anything but a gross imprecision introduced by people
incapable of following rigorous standards.
It has never been anything more than
: iceweasel-linky
I was thinking something similar. I am sponsoring Arnaud Renevier for
his noscript package. Initially, he called it just noscript. It was
rejected by the ftp-masters as too generic. Arnaud renamed it to
mozilla-noscript and that was accepted.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
friend) for the existence of new kernel..
How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :-)
Anyhow, what I'm
for other packages providing GnomeVFS methods), so that its
timestamp changes.
This might be a really impetus and test case for the new dpkg triggers
that have been proposed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the package. Especially in the case of mass
filings resulting from things like rebuilding the archive or other
cases (like the bug reporter not knowing/being able to access the stuff
in NEW), I think there should be a bit of leniency.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
possibly monitor
upstream development for every package (even just those which don't have
active maintainers), we can't really know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the
filename. In the future this might be added as an additional feature,
but there are some problems with this.
I'd be interested to know in what problems there are with this.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
, via
regular mails to d-d-a and in the developers reference.
I think that having a centrally located list of teams within Debian and
where someone can go to learn more/get involved is a good thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
it, right? Then $1
becomes the package name.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
are becoming increasingly unpopular.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the
empty string. If a package is the target of a security upload in
stable, you can be certain that the testing/unstable version
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:54:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the
empty string. If a package
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:49:07PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (= 1.0.1-1) and (
1.0.1-2) be more correct? That way
there as
well.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in the next
source upload?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:56:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Your case is probably better handled with a simple higher-or-equal
dependency.
Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (= 1.0.1-1) and (
1.0.1-2) be more correct
?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packages? It seems like
Nico's original gripe is valid.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
So the simple(r) option is subscribe to pts.
Doesn't the key used to sign the upload tell you?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
So the simple(r) option is subscribe
and then requires a security update, it would not be buildable
in stable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for the configuration.
My goal is that it is secure.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if the password is correct or not.
You mean that the passwords go in the clear?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:24:53AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
man procmailrc
On gmail?
gmail does support POP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
or the like. I'm not saying that your situation
is not possible, simply that trading size for compression/decompression
time would benefit far more people than it would hurt.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:09:50PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:12:33AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 21:15 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
I think compression ratio is better
to
the end users)
I think that is the principal problem. I use apt-proxy and have about a
dozen machines (counting virtual machines) that all hit that one
apt-proxy.
I am not sure how best to solve that problem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
.
an understudy or standby ?
Could we call it co-maintainer or something like that?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
installed on my development machine
and I do not experience the slowness you talk about. It was installed
about 3.5 years ago.
How much RAM/CPU does the machine have? How fast are the disks?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
of installed packages is terribly
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, and it failed here with kmail.
Is the crypt+sign mail format standard ?
The last vote (on the package upload rules) worked for me sending
encrypted from mutt.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:12:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
People should be given assistance and encouragement in
doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
little time
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:47:38AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
getting mired in a sea of bugs
, someone NMUs to fix
the bug and the mainainer immediately uploads to revert the NMU? It
seems that there needs to be some way to handle situations like that.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
in
doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
little time (sick family members).
I like doing bug triage as well. I guess it is because I am a neat
freak and anal about organization.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
.
What is the point?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
201 - 248 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
