,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
armhf
Hello, ...
This is the first time in the over-a-year that i have been banned from the
debian mailing lists that i try to go around the ban to post an appeal to
the whole debian community. And i am sorry to come again with this.
I write this, because even despite what debian has done to me, i
another stab is taken against me it
is as if the wound is fresh again, and the hurt comes all over again.
Do you really think i deserved this ? Really ?
Please, don't do this anymore, and leave me in peace,
Sadly,
Sven Luther
? Especially since i was
expulsed from debian since then, and in general censored from all lists,
and expulsed and shuned by the few remaining active kernel team members.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
threatened to leave the kernel team and debian if those
firmwares where removed.
So, this comes as no surprise to me, and one more reason why you should
not have expulsed me, but rather should have given me more support in
the work i tried to do for debian. Your lose,
Sadly,
Sven Luther
of the kernel team, and in general am considered as a sub-human of
the most evil kind, while everyone congratulated themselves to get ride
of me. This mail will thus most probably not reach the mailing lists,
consider bouncing it if you consider it appropriate.
Sadly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
to address this issue with the
hardware manufacturers last year ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backups setup.
This is i believe the major challenge that debian has been facing into all his
structural positions, and altough some areas made the move cleanly, altough
not without growing pains, the buildd infrastructure is maybe not one of them.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:20:48 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:18:19 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
mol- The Mac-on-Linux emulator
mol-modules-source - transitional dummy package
mol-source - The Mac-on-Linux emulator - source for kernel modules
Closes: 400376
Changes:
mol (0.9.71.dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:43:28 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
rootskel - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer (udeb)
rootskel-bootfloppy - Skeleton root filesystem used by debian-installer boot
floppy (udeb)
Changes:
rootskel (1.43) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:41:01 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:07:04 +0100
Source: gnome-randr-applet
Binary: gnome-randr-applet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Parted Maintainer Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libparted1.8-0 - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library
libparted1.8-dbg - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library debug development
files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:13:12 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 25
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Parted Maintainer Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libparted1.7-1 - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library
libparted1.7-dbg - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library debug development
files
libparted1.7
it is better just to tell people not
to do that.
Do some arch not have trouble with fakeroot, and need sudo to work ? This
means you need to be able to build packages as real root, no ? Or was this
fixed lately ? I think mips/mipsel, and some other arch where concerned.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nobootloader - Don't install any bootloader. (udeb)
Changes:
nobootloader (1.14) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sven Luther ]
* Genesi firmware 1.3 will be released without the chrp compliant partition
numbering finally, so bumped the check to 1.3.99
, that someone else than you is in charge of
doing the day-to-day work of the secretary, maybe the DPL or TC would be
adequate on this here, or maybe some kind of assistant secretary either
permanent or delegated for the occasion.
Anthony, can you comment on this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:11:39AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Salut Josselin,
Dit, tu peut m'expliquer ton comportement sur irc. Tu me kick pour te
repondre, alors que tu n'arrete pas de mentioner mon nom et donc de parler
de
moi.
Ça commence à devenir super
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
Moi aussi je trouve cela extremement pénible.
Serais-tu donc masochiste alors ?
Et Josselin et co sadique alors ?
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
remarques, souvent
desobligeantes, a mon sujet.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:48:07PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:40:33PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Salut Josselin,
Dit, tu peut m'expliquer ton comportement sur irc. Tu me kick pour te
repondre, alors que tu n'arrete pas de mentioner mon nom et
repondent,
surtout si tu dis des choses desobligeantes (pour rester poli) a leur sujet.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:57:23PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 23:40 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
Salut Josselin,
Dit, tu peut m'expliquer ton comportement sur irc. Tu me kick pour te
repondre, alors que tu n'arrete pas de mentioner mon nom et donc de
Guidelines, http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/.
Cela vaudrait bien entendu aussi bien pour tous les abonnés,
développeur officiel ou pas.
Je suis pour, pareil pour les listes irc meme.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:16 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Tu aurais pas un peu peur de devoir revoir ton comportement sur les
listes et
sur irc par hazard ?
Et a propos, pour les donneurs de leçons en orthographes, à mon
(like a rewording of Josselin's proposal on top of
the consensual proposal for example).
On behalf of the Debian Kernel Team,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
[1] - http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007
[2] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/10/msg00183.html
[3] -
http://wiki.debian.org
will be void anyway,
and i strongly call for everyone to vote further discussion over the other
solutions.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at a later time, and
indeed our DPL has already said he intent to trigger further discussion about
these issues around the edinbourg debconf time.
So, i am not going to vote on this one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
les $GREP_OPTIONS.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:47:54PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Le 03.10.2006, à 19:37:42, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit:
Je recompile le noyau avec kernel-package 10.062 du 1 Oct 2006 et je
fait un rapport de bug si le problème
divers linux-headers-2.6.18-efi installe ? et le linux-kbuild ?
Sinon, tu peut verifier ques les .ko sont bien builder et simplemment pas
installe, ou pas builder du tout.
Si ils sont pas builder, file un bug contre linux-2.6, sinon contre
kernel-package.
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:14:31PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Le 01.10.2006, à 19:00:25, Sven Luther a écrit:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:20:56PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Bonjour,
Je me suis compilé un noyau 2.6.18 grâce à kernel-package. Tout va bien.
Ensuite je veux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:57:48 +0200
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
be counted on the fingers of both
hands or so.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
binary format, the authors of other
pieces of GPLed code fo the linux kernel cannot even sue us for distributing
the kernel code with those GPL-violating binary BLOBs.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:18:28PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Since the firmware blobs are not derivative works of the kernel, but
constitute mere agregation in the same binary format, the authors of other
pieces of GPLed code fo the linux kernel cannot even sue us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:04:50 +0200
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:40:37 +0200
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:10:16AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Unfortunately, other mailing list discussions have been less
happy. A somewhat acrimonious argument between Sven Luther and members
of the d-i team spread out across various lists, starting at
[3]. There has been quite lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:16 +
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:21:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The maintainer is held responsible
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:58:17AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:28:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Notice also that both you and Colin Watson, where donated pegasos machines,
(and guess who arranged that), so the unavailability of a decent build
machine
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:26:38PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
So, with all that said, do you still believe it is normal that a perfectly
running daily build was rejected in maybe a few minutes/hours after i sent
that email, while
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:14, Sven Luther wrote:
1) daily build business card and netinst isos are failing to build
since april 1, which means they don't include the broadcom tg3 module
at all, and are thus not really usable
developpers, if you would ask me, and in any
case, they are not true to the social contract.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:59:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:53]:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means
not clearly
show that nobody is in charge anymore (or at least nobody who will notice or
have the time to fix it or even ask for help if he doesn't has the time) ?
And in light of those two facts, can you please tell me again with a straight
face that i am over-reacting ?
friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, best that could happen now would be if someone just takes up
the loose ends, and tries to fix the issues - and I hope someone just
does.
Yeah, problem is we where already
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Because they kicked out the powerpc porter ? Do you not think this is reason
enough to consider debian for powerpc dead
No, this is only reason enough to look
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to fix it, maybe it would have been fixed already, but no,
the d-i team decided this otherwise.
You can't *commit*, but you still can
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:17:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:07:36PM +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken from
me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the issue ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
from
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:32:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15
considerations overstep his responsabilities.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
(dropping the ridiculous CC list, AFAICT everybody is subscribed)
On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:47, Sven Luther wrote:
None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
happened here is that one such project
of sven-bashing, and hope everything will be fine.
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:47:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:03]:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The maintainer is held responsible (and frans and joeyh have not stepped
down
from reminding me of this in the past) of the build failure, while a
contributor
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, it is what i see. There is nothing to clarify on this
point. They removed me to get ride of me, and despite Colin's help,
they don't really have someone
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
you kicked me out [...]
just to get ride of me [...]
it was more important to get ride of sven [...]
that you kicked the powerpc maintainer out of the project [...]
uther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:42:41 +
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:25:10 +0100
Source: mkvmlinuz
Binary: mkvmlinuz
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sven Luther
les considered comme des idiots incapable d'etre responsable, ce qui semble
etre la vue des ftp-masters en ce moment (ou du moins dans le passe proche).
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
devenu ftp-master assistant que depuis recement).
(Peut-etre qu'ils ont simplement besoin d'un peu de concurence pour les bouge
un peu cependant :)
Amicalement,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
involving the ide-modular patch from Herbert
Xu, which was now dropped.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:24:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the
inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will
refrain from doing
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:29:18AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-19 08:06]:
The question is if the problems with the patches and the reason for not
applying it will be commented, thus giving the author a chance to modify it,
or change his approach
.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:44:05PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Sven Luther]
I am not saying that there needs to be an immediate response, or all
patches need to be applied, but i believe that it is elementary
politeness from a package maintainer, to at least aknowledge a patch
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:34:09PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-19 12:28]:
Anyway, Steve, please try to live up to your own standard, and cut
the ad-hominem attacks out in the future.
Describing the situation as it is perceived by many people
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:07:41PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10595 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
There is a difference here though, this is my public process for expulsion,
No, this is a random flamewar on a random list and has *nothing* to do
with any actually running process
for not
applying it will be commented, thus giving the author a chance to modify it,
or change his approach to fixing the bug, or if the patch will be utherly
ignored, which is an act of total contempt to his author as well as the users
affected by the bug.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
once.
Thanks, ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
time. I don't know if native speaker realise
this, because many non-native speaker seem to have a fluent english, but there
are times when the right words just don't come, and you are grasping with
finding the right word, and often make un-wise choices.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, and altough this is
well understood in real life case, people often don't notice when someone is
snapping in this immaterial community we have, and unwillingly contribute to
worsen the problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:33:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 15 Mar 2006, Sven Luther told this:
You did never intent to do so, since you clearly said numerous time
that you where frustrated with the kernel team taking over your work
on kernel-package, and that you put self-compiled
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Replying to this since it is addressed to me personally.
Err, ...
This line seems to add some incomprehension. I am no more readin debian-devel,
nor any of the other mailing lists. Steve, on irc, has informed about the mail
he
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, trying to forget the issue. He sais he had no time immediately,
but would look into it.
This whole issue still blew up because of a single harmless comment i made on
wednesday, and my insatisfaction for jonas not crediting my work in solving
the bug, which is a sad thing.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the header set:
Mail-Followup-To: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
was this intentional? I think Sven is subscribed to this list...
I am subscribed, but am not actyively reading the mailing list, in order to
fight back on the urge to reply too much. Thus i
gone over to the ennemy :) ?
So, please tell me when i have said anything such to you in the context of
debian, i would be very surprised about it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason
for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a
printk
, right ?
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and that other had had trouble dealing with him, even if you
didn't know that when you made your hasty judgement.
Friendly, still,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:53:04AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I strongly agree that Sven Luther is a disruptive element, and
his presence hurts the project more than it helps. I have found a
pattern of behaviour from him, where any discussion first focuses on
blame allocation
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:54:58AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:26:07PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I hadn't replied to the bug report because I wasn't involved in the
Ubuntu kernel at the point
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:26:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I've never worked closely with Sven Luther, but I've lurked in some
teams he's member of, so if my capability as an observer is worth
something to you, you may be interested in this if you're unfamiliar
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:17:06PM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:08:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I am still a bit disgusted of seeing a bug report i provided to ubuntu, with
patch and all the proper research immediately after the breezy beta go
unanswered
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:48:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:21:09PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I had decided to keep silent for the next few week to let matters settle,
but
as you ask directly and i was pointer to your question, i will break that
resolution
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:23:53PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Sven Luther [Wed, Mar 15 2006, 08:04:50PM]:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:53:04AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I strongly agree that Sven Luther is a disruptive element, and
his presence hurts
users he willingly and uncaringly broke their system.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suggesting it, but
this has to be continued to the d-i kernel .udebs to be complete. It works
nicely for ubuntu, so why not for us ?
I leave this all to you, i hope you are up to the responsability, and will not
participate again in the kernel team until i am asked to.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:48:38PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 15-Mar-06, 15:40 (CST), Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But do you think that anything i said in those is insulting in some way, or
a
reason for me to be expelled from debian ?
No, it's a demonstration of your
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:07:02AM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:48:38PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
I'm a little sympathetic, because I used to suffer from the same
disease, and I still have the occasional outbreak, but I'm trying
hard, and mostly getting
1 - 100 of 1012 matches
Mail list logo
