recursive build-depends or similar

2002-12-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
Mailsync depends on libc-client which can be compiled one way or another including or excluding ssl, kerberos etc. It happens that libc-client in woody did not include kerberos but libc-client in sid does. Is there a way to specify this in the build dependecies? Right know I have to decide if I

Re: Porting Xconfigurator to Debian!

2002-12-05 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Michael Banck wrote: Maybe what we need are people who read package descriptions prior to install Debian picking it's users instead of users picking Debian. *t -- --- Tomas Pospisek SourcePole -

Re: automatic selection which kernel image to install

2002-11-27 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
You might want to talk to the debian-installer people. They either might have some ideas about it or will certainly be interested... Grep the -devel list for debian-installer and Tollef Fog Heen. *t -- --- Tomas Pospisek

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)

2002-09-02 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Sebastian Rittau wrote: Remember: You're just the package maintainer. The package does not belong to you and it's not yours by any means. Oh, I think you are very mistaken. It is not his in the sense that it's under GPL. But it's his in the sense that since he is its

Re: Please compile treetool on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, powerpc and s390

2002-08-29 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: unfortunately treetool is non-free because there is neigther a license nor any upstream author available. And what about this: http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/Registered/Help/treetool/ (2nd link when you search for treetool on google)

Re: Bug#143209: ITP: switchconf -- Change network config for laptops

2002-04-17 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Sebastien J. Gross wrote: § Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-16 Severity: wishlist * Package name: switchconf Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Sebastien J. Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.sjgross.org/app/switchconf *

Re: Supermount

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote: On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:31, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote: On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote: Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the

Re: Supermount

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote: The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let you do stupid thing such as ejecting a medium in use. Depending on what use means it's not the user that is stupid, but the

gcc-3.0 problems

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is far too small to figure out what's going on here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032 and I estimate that I won't have the time to improve my knowledge sufficiently either untill woody deadline

Re: gcc-3.0 problems

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: If you're testing this on your x86 (or similar) platform, the undefined references are to be expected. You can't link 2.95 and 3.0 C++ code, and QT is 2.95 C++ code. Try working on one of the architectures in question; they should be available

Re: can aspell drop hppa for now? (was Re: gcc-3.0 problems)

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
Ciao Domenico On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Domenico Andreoli wrote: i'm in the same situation of tomas, i'm sure that aspell won't compile on hppa in time for woody release. it has some kind of problem with gcc 3.0 i cannot manage and i'm not receiving any help (see bug #139515). Maybe you're as

Re: Imp 3.0/3.1 debian packages?

2002-04-12 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luis Bustamante wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid? Beta packages can be found at: http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/ Is there any problem you're aware of with

Re: How about pptp-linux? (was: Why was libpam-pgsql removed from the woody lineup?)

2002-04-09 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: On Mon 08 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:40:04AM -0700, David D.W. Downey wrote: Just wondering why libpam-pgsql was removed from the woody lineup. It

Re: Debian's problems, Debian's future

2002-04-09 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:58:24AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:39:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: I beleive this method is patented by somebody, which is why it's not in use/supported. Possibly it

Re: pcmcia-modules in woody

2002-01-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Lauri Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.15.1240 +0100]: pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist. Whats up duck ? pcmcia-modules have, AFAIK, been discontinued. There's been a pcmcia-modules release for