Hi,
- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote on 2010-06-05 22:30:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
is that Linux is free. If they have to
Hi,
- brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:07:22PM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva mar...@debian.org
* Package name: haskell-gnomevfs
Version
Hi,
- Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
(blah blah blah blah)
Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
lilo upstream, it's going away.
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the line past where
lilo can reliably determine the payload size.
This bug *can* be fixed, but not without a significant rewrite of the
way that lilo's stage2 loader
Hi,
- Thomas Goirand tho...@gplhost.com wrote:
But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will be
more difficult to create new
installations (require much more work to replace the
xen-create-image script).
Well, I've been maintaining dtc-xen since Lenny, and it does
Hello,
- Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:29 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will be
more difficult to create new installations (require much more work
to
replace the xen-create-image
- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:58 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
But xen-tools have be removed from Squeeze, so I suppose it will
be more difficult to create new
installations (require much more work to replace the
xen-create-image script).
- Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:23:07AM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
I am looking into packaging xenner already as a backup plan if I
cannot
manage to fix some major reentrancy problems in the Xen dom0 code
(Xensource 2.6.18 patches, the pvops
Hi,
- Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
First of all, I'd like to say a big THANKS to all the people
maintaining Xen
within (in of course also outside) Debian; you really saved us lots of
money and
energy (which is both, electrical and that personal one).
[...]
4)
- Marc Haber mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May b...@snoopy.debian.net
wrote:
Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake
because KVM
requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
Xen is
- Gabor Gombas gomb...@sztaki.hu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get
the
upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and
obviously
the pv_ops dom0 patches still need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:54:10 -0500
Source: lilo
Binary: lilo lilo-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:22.8-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Changed-By: William
Maintainer: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
dsyslog- advanced modular syslog daemon
dsyslog-dbg - advanced modular syslog daemon - debug
dsyslog-module-gnutls - advanced modular syslog daemon - GnuTLS support
dsyslog-module
: low
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious-plugins - Base plugins for audacious
audacious-plugins-dbg - Audacious-Plugins debug symbols
audacious-plugins-dev - Useful
: low
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious - small and fast audio player which supports lots of formats
audacious-dbg - audacious media player (debugging symbols
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: python-greenlet
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Bob Ippolito b...@redivi.com
* URL : http://undefined.org/python/#greenlet
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: python-eventlet
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Linden Research, Inc. eventlet...@lists.secondlife.com
* URL : http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Eventlet
* License
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious-plugins - Base plugins for audacious
audacious-plugins-dbg - Audacious-Plugins debug symbols
audacious-plugins-dev - Useful virtual
: low
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious-plugins - Base plugins for audacious
audacious-plugins-dbg - Audacious-Plugins debug symbols
audacious-plugins-dev - Useful
: low
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious - small and fast audio player which supports lots of formats
audacious-dbg - audacious media player (debugging symbols
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 11:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Peter Miller:
I've been considering turning my fuzzy string compare function into a
library.
I would certainly welcome that.
Would you be willing to relicense it under a more permissive license,
so that we don't have to worry
Maintainer: Debian Audacious Packagers
pkg-audacious-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
audacious-plugins - Base plugins for audacious
audacious-plugins-dbg - Audacious-Plugins debug symbols
audacious-plugins-dev - Useful virtual
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:03 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks,
As some of you may already know, I have been doing a lot of package
removals and QA work. One of the ones I ran across lately is
OpenMotif. It has been orphaned since 2006 and has several bugs against
it. However, it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: polkadot
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* URL : http://polkadot.dereferenced.org/ (not yet up)
* License : GPLv2
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:05 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
to
enforce it (either pure social
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 14:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
neno...@petrie:~$ sudo yum -c ak-bootstrap.conf
--installroot=/home/nenolod/bootstraptest install centos-release yum
ak-bootstrap 100% |=| 1.1 kB
00:00
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:25 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry that it took us so much time to make a working yum package,
but we were quite overloaded with our work, taking over all the
customers of another web hosting company (taking
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 21:11 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
I call bollocks here. I am using the version of yum in stable right now
to yield perfectly working virtual machine filesystems.
How is it broken when it is working as expected on production servers
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:05 -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
As the silent co-maintainer of lilo I believe I should now voice my
thoughts on this
I too believe that lilo should belive that lilo should be remove *at
some point* but now is not the time. So I restate my willingness to
take over fully
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 16:22 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Nenolod: sorry for the other mail.
William Pitcock wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk wrote:
Lilo upstream is dead
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
No this means I take over the package try to cou ntact upstream etc
^^
THERE IS NO UPSTREAM ANYMORE. If you're not willing to become upstream
and wish to take it over, then we
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
From lilo package BTS which I was tracking for l10n purposes. So I
just happened to notice William's answer to a bug
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:20 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative with us.
Why is this?
See my other mail, basically, lilo upstream
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:52 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative with us.
Why is this?
I think
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk wrote:
Lilo upstream is dead (no release in quite a while), but the lilo
maintainer has also been seen as saying in various mailing lists etc,
that since
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:17 +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:03:10 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
I also use lilo for /boot on LVM and I also clearly remember that
was the major reason for the previous
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:09 +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Otavio Salvador may or may not have written...
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
[snip]
Anyone remember the fairly big upset when lilo was removed from testing
around D-I Lenny Beta2?
I also share the feeling that
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:44 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
be gone by June.
Has the package already been offered for
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:40 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
un...@debian.org wrote:
OS I also share the feeling that a lot of people still uses LILO; if
OS possible I do belive it should be kept.
I use lilo, I like lilo.
I don't
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:19 +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
|| On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
un...@debian.org wrote:
|| I use lilo, I like lilo.
|| I don't like grub because it has unlogically
: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Description:
dsyslog- advanced modular syslog daemon
dsyslog-dbg - advanced modular syslog daemon - debug
dsyslog-module-gnutls - advanced modular syslog daemon - PostgreSQL support
dsyslog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:07:53 -0600
Source: libdownload
Binary: libdownload-dev libdownload1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Changed
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:30 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Oops... I strongly suggest providing a wrapper that matches netstat's
format as closely as possible (even bug-for-bug if possible). Netstat
is probably among the most used tools by sysadmins and programmers
alike, both for software we
Hi,
Is it 720p or 1080i or 1080p?
The following modeline makes my 720p 32 HDTV happy:
|SubSection Display
|Depth 24
|Modes 1680x1050
|EndSubSection
William
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:04 -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I have a Samsung 42 HD TV. It has a
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:56 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Karl Ferdinand Ebert kfeb...@gmail.com
* Package name: tmux
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Nicholas Marriott n...@users.sf.net
* URL :
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:42 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my own
and thought that it would be a good idea
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 22:59 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:10:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 03:19 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Rochet grada...@gradator.net
* Package name: mydns
Version : 1.2.8.26
Upstream Author : Howard Wilkinsin how...@cohtech.com
* URL : http://mydns.pl/
*
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 23:35 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:31 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
I have 35 TEAC CD-Burner, 18 TraxData and a bunch of Yamaha.
All they are SCSI and not a singel one is working with wodim.
The same goes for my 4 DVD burners
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 17:54 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:43 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joerg_Schilling
I notice that Joerg's Wikipedia page is rather bare.
Instead of spending time covering all the old arguments on this list,
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 00:18 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
- The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
legally
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Before Eduard Bloch made insane modifications, the code was GPLv2 and legal.
Now the cude is undistributable because of modifications in the fork
that are incompatible with the Copyright law.
See my bug report from December 2006.
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 11:56 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk wrote:
The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
- The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not
be
legally
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:26 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk wrote:
are some Debian maintainers that rather attack software authors instead
of
colaborating.
It is impossible to collaborate when you add invariant sections to the
code. Well
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:38 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:56:38AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk wrote:
2. I am not convinced that there is any legal issue with the fork
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 16:28 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at getting a video card, and I want to know what video card
that has 3D acceleration to get. Normally I'd ask on -users but as the
subject says I want to know what video cards will still have
acceleration when the
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 19:30 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
If it's GPLv2+ and doesn't depend on proprietary software, why it cannot
be in main?
Does it depend on proprietary things?
Regards,
As it is now, PlayOnLinux makes the user install Microsoft fonts. You
can
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 07:56 +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Rondal wrote:
Hi,
UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
see where it will
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:38 +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: kmess2
Version: 2.0alpha
Upstream Author: Diederik van der Boor
URL:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 08:37 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:00:22PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
There is also questions concerning why you would want to package
something that has effectively a dead upstream, and many code flaws
which could result in security
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:50 +0100, Rondal wrote:
Hi,
UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
see where it will block inclusion into Debian.
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 13:59 +0100, Rondal wrote:
retitle 515134 ITP: ircservices-church -- IRC Services for IRC networks
providing services like Nick- and ChanServ
Hi,
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424844 .
Inclusion of ircservices in Debian may be
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 21:37 +0100, Stefan Becker wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Becker ron...@cyberspirits.eu
* Package name: unrealircd
Version : 3.2.7
Upstream Author : Carsten Munk (stske...@unrealircd.com),
Dominick Meglio
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 21:52 +0100, Stefan Becker wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Becker ron...@cyberspirits.eu
* Package name: ircservices
Version : 5.1.14
Upstream Author : Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org
* URL :
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:43 +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:48 +0900
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
How about letting the person doing the installation write the labels
if they want to use LABEL and use UUID by default.
Or as a third option, put everything in
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 14:09 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Mike Hommey dijo [Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:46:11AM +0100]:
A good option would be to use LABEL or UID instead. However I am not
sure if that has some drawbacks as well:
- for uuid the system is less forgiving if you swap disks
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 00:19 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article 87bptnccj6@mid.deneb.enyo.de you wrote:
What needs to be done so that these two issues can be fixed?
| Disk devices may change on reboot
A good option would be to use LABEL or UID instead. However I am not sure if
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 10:46 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:22:07AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 00:19 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article 87bptnccj6@mid.deneb.enyo.de you wrote:
What needs to be done so that these two issues can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:08:22 -0500
Source: sockstat
Binary: sockstat
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
Changed-By: William Pitcock neno
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: mupen64plus
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Blight rich...@fascinationsoftware.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: pacman-package-manager
Version : 3.2.2
Upstream Author : Judd Vinet jvi...@zeroflux.org
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org
* Package name: libdownload
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:22 +1100, Andy Nicholson wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Nicholson a...@engagemedia.org
* Package name: Plumi
Package names need to be lowercase.
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Andy Nicholson a...@engagemedia.org
* URL
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:43 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for.
Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real
answers.
So what about killing the concept of sections entirely ?
The primary user of section: is
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 23:04 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
The above article concerns the damage that Josselin's actions cause to the
Debian project. D-d-a is not that different from other parts of Debian, bad
behaviour in other forums also hurts the project.
I think that flame-war
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 19:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 21:43 -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gsnes9x
= visualboyadvance ?
C'mon, there are at least 15 years between the two consoles.
And nope,
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 20:42 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
You forgot xmms. It is still heavily used and there are no alternative
for it. (It is just such a application as xv - very old but there are no
alternative that completely replace it (in all facets).)
There's not?
There's at least 20
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 20:51 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Can you advise me on how to get out of that dilemma?
Stop trying to get qmail into Debian?
or
Take on upstream development of qmail and solve all the problems
(whether qmail will then be recognisable compared to the existing
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 23:57 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 28 November 2008 22:42, William Pitcock wrote:
I think issues like these call for an unsupported repository outside of
Debian, but publicized within the community as an unofficial repository
for things like qmail
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 02:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 01:57, William Pitcock wrote:
What I propose is something more along the lines of Gentoo's sunrise
overlay... a repository that anyone can get upload access to provided
that they understand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: appliancekit
Version : 0.131
Upstream Author : William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://appliancekit.systeminplace.net/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:01:59 -0600
Source: lilo
Binary: lilo lilo-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:22.8-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Pitcock [EMAIL
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:29 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
http://screenshots.debian.net
[...]
Have
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.
Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian?
Does this mean that non-free should move to a third-party repo like
certain other repos out there
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:34 +, Robert Lemmen wrote:
hi everyone,
the current situation concerning firmware blobs and dfsg-freeness is a
bit sad, among other things because there really isn't too much we can
do about it in the short run. so how about some practical proposal that
we can
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 10:38 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:22 +, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thomas: your continued inaction and unwillingness to code an acceptable
solution to this issue, in spite of being aware of the problem since
at least 2004 -- over four years
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:30 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:59 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
If we waited for a release to be 100% perfect, it will likely take
several more years. The good news is that the amount of inline firmware
in the kernel is decreasing. So
release and not to add anything to
that list?
I would be entirely happy with that. But I have just been told by
William Pitcock that apparently we are required somehow to support new
hardware with non-free software too. So it's not a decreasing list,
it's an accordion list with no real
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:36 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 16:27 -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:20 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 23:28 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Would it be a good compromise between SCs #1, #3
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:03 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, those who contribute to Debian must be dedicated to
ensuring future releases of Debian support the latest available
hardware at time of release.
That's news to me. Where
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: dronebl-tools
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dronebl.org/doc/dronebl-tools
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:00:42 -0500
Source: libaosd
Binary: aosd-cat libaosd-dev libaosd2 libaosd-text2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
Audacious Packagers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
audacious - small and fast audio player which supports lots of formats
audacious-dbg - audacious media player (debugging symbols)
audacious-dev - audacious development files
libaudclient1 - audacious dbus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:31:17 -0500
Source: dsyslog
Binary: dsyslog dsyslog-module-mysql dsyslog-module-postgresql dsyslog-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: William Pitcock
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 18:30 +0300, root wrote:
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-19
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Please investigate if files included in lsb-base conform to DFSG. A lincense
change to GPL would be better suited for Debian.
Policy / 2.1. The Debian Free
Hi,
Using latest initramfs-tools with lilo works for me, provided that the
new large-memory feature is enabled.
As maks says, user error applies here.
William
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:43 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi fellow developers,
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Harrasing LILO users by silencing bugreports about problems[2] using
it
is the wrong approach. If LILO is officially unsupported by Debian
(not
only by kernel team and/or initramfs-tools maintainer) we should drop
that
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:53 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you have both GRUB and LILO installed, there will be problems. That
is infact, a bug. They should Conflict with each other to ensure that
only one can be installed at a time
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
