On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 06:02:15AM -0400, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information
At 14:02 -0400 1998-10-16, Branden Robinson wrote:
Topi Miettinen has done some research on this. When we get SysV-style pty
support in glibc, xterm can lose its root privileges altogether. I hear this
will be in glibc 2.1?
Yes, that's correct.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)
URL:mailto:[EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/xf86Jstk.so
I have always gotten this
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/xf86Jstk.so
I have always gotten this error. I don't know how to fix it, but it
doesn't seem to hurt anyone.
Well, this isn't a shared library that's going to be linked to, so
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/xf86Jstk.so
I have always gotten this error. I don't know how to fix it, but it
doesn't seem to hurt anyone.
Again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% echo E: xfs: unregistered-script-in-etc-init.d
/etc/init.d/xfs | lintian-info
E: xfs: unregistered-script-in-etc-init.d /etc/init.d/xfs
N:
N: The package installs an /etc/init.d script which is not registered in
N: the postinst script.
N:
Branden == Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branden Topi Miettinen has done some research on this. When we
Branden get SysV-style pty support in glibc, xterm can lose its
Branden root privileges altogether. I hear th= is will be in
Branden glibc 2.1?
SysV-style pty
7 matches
Mail list logo
