You (Christophe Le Bars) wrote:
Doesn't glibc use /usr/share/locale, too?
Well, I don't know...
I do. That's the reason I started this thread: should it or shouldn't it?
I've deciced it should, and I'm configuring glibc to use /usr/share.
Now should we move /usr/lib/zoneinfo too? What
Doesn't glibc use /usr/share/locale, too?
Well, I don't know...
The only difference I'm aware of
is /usr/share/i18n instead of /usr/share/nls. But then this already holds
for libc5 starting with 5.4.0
The next wg15-locale package must provide a symbolic link then
(/usr/share/i18n -
**On 14 Aug, In article /usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale,
** MVS (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes:
MVSA quick question (probably directed most at Ian). I notice that
MVS/usr/lib/locale is part of the base system, but that nothing uses it.
MVS
MVSOTOH, some packages do provide /usr/share
what to use since the new GNU libc6 wants to know
where the locale directory is, and with the new FSSTND coming up, and
existing practice, etc.
/usr/lib/localeor /usr/share/locale ?
[I've configured it for /usr/share/locale at the moment]
Mike.
--
Miquel van| Cistron Internet Services
4 matches
Mail list logo