On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead
of the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
Could someone give a pointer where I can found out
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from the system, and
the simplest thing is then to run some UTP to the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
The method described on http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php certainly
looks like a hack. It basically describes a way to convert a Home model
to a Pro model without paying. Given
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
Protocol. How can a Linux Router speek
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
the
USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Hello again,
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
efingerd
this bug has been closed already for some time, and the
security issue
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
I have not closed the bug since point 2) is not fixed yet (will
be rather quickly). Gee, I do not like people who submit
zillions of unrelated bugs in one bugreport :-)
You now have the clone command to fix this.
Colin Watson writes:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:56:12PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
The build on sparc is due to something else, don't have time to
investigate that right now; mips doesn't seem to have even attempted the
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
ilisp
These packages will get a brief chance to be reconsidered in the
next few days, but don't bet too heavily on them making it. From
this point on, packages that are still in testing that have serious,
grave or critical bugs that get
Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
me. I did not intend to use the Closed: syntax in the changelog, but
instead sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with close BUGID as
described in my copy of bug-maint-mailcontrol.txt which I guess is out
of date and I should have paid closer attention.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
kvdr masqmailxtell
As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
masqmail (- to 0.1.16-2)
* Maintainer: Debian QA Group
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
kvdr masqmailxtell
As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
because I don't understand why masqmail has
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
kvdr masqmailxtell
As much as I like to have woody released
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:12:07PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
None of these packages have RC bugs. masqmail itself just has two
important bugs which will even be
As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
This is had had to go.
AJ mailed over the past few weeks. note the plural.
Greetings,
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:34:45AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
be considered tomorrow.
It also says:
Depends: galeon mozilla
galeon 1.2.0-2
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:44:32PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused
because I don't understand why masqmail has to go:
This is had had to go.
AJ mailed over the past few weeks. note the plural.
Well, the last RC bug of masqmail
Just some short questions.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
libqt3-psql
I just came back from vacation and saw that the new qt3 uploads that fix
the problem are still waiting in the queue. Would it be possible to get
this package back into woody if I upload an
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:56:12PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
The build on sparc is due to something else, don't have time to
investigate that right now; mips doesn't seem to have even attempted the
build.
antlr
IIRC galeon is not moved to woody just because it depends on mozilla
which has an RC bug. Since mozilla is not removed but will be fixed
before the release (at least that's how I understood Anthony's mail) I
wonder if galeon then can make it back in. Or did you just removev
galeon 1.0.3 and
On Sat 06 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
[...]
dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
Could someone give a pointer where I can found out why
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
* gs-common's license issues need to be resolved
Just to keep people from wasting their time to fix this: My local
gs-common edition has the following changes:
* debian/control: Add dependency on gsfonts. Rationale: gs is
Hello again,
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
acroread libqt3-psql mercury
antlr libsnmp-rubymsyslog
cgiemail lire
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding
[Bas Zoetekouw]
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Did you check
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi Petter!
You wrote:
[Bas Zoetekouw]
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Did you check
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon?
Yes, of course. It
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
lclint
I'm working on an NMU just now.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream
I demand that Anthony Towns may or may not have written...
[snip]
I'm becoming increasingly confident in woody's release readiness. So, to go
out on a limb:
Debian 3.0 (codenamed woody) will release on May 1st, 2002.
Oh good. What will it be releasing? :-)
--
| Darren Salt |
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
be considered tomorrow.
It also says:
Depends: galeon mozilla
galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
testing because:
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist bugs) but
a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone who knows jikes have
any idea if this can be fixed soon, or is it a
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 3:42 pm, Will Newton wrote:
ilisp
ilisp is in fact fixed, it's just the bug has not been closed yet due to a
typo in the changelog. I'll email the maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi Colin!
You wrote:
galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
testing because:
[mozilla doesn't build on hppa and is not yet built on m68k, sparc]
In other words, it's currently mostly mozilla that's broken, not galeon.
I guess that if mozilla is fixed then
On Apr 06, Anthony Towns wrote:
pfaedit
The RC bug appears to be in an out-of-date version of the package.
Furthermore, it's been closed for over a week...
popularity-contest
Fixed for several days in NMU.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/
--
To
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Actually, as always, it'll release when it's ready: if we find that the
software doesn't meet our expectations on April 30th, you'll find me on
the ground writhing in pain with leaves, bark and wood all over the place
[1].
Well, I
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 11:22, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
OK. Since the build problems seem to be easily solved (see #141077), I
hope both mozilla and galeon can be included in woody.
Indeed. aj already knows that I'm on the next plane to Australia if
woody releases without Galeon :)
--
To
galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Galeon was unfortunately removed to a RC bug that did apply to a version
in sid, not in woody, that
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:42:38PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist
bugs) but a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Looking at the build logs for antlr, the jikes bug in question (on
alpha, right? #123041) has already been fixed. Somebody should
reschedule that build.
My personal impression is that jikes in sid is very broken.
Some packages that used to
43 matches
Mail list logo
