On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Could you explain "lower bus factor" a bit more, please?
Don already explained this for the BTS, but in general, many if not
most of the services Debian provides are maintained by 0.5 person (one
busy person who already has lots of other
On Thu, 05 Jan 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Right, but I'd like to hear a bit more from Paul about this is
> relevant for the spam issue.
Currently only Blars and myself are doing anything with the spam in the
BTS. [And I have very limited time which I'm spending primarily on BTS
development and
Hello Christian,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:51:01PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 01/05/2017 08:27 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:24:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> The solution is simply a lower bus factor in all Debian services,
> >> including the BTS [...]
> >
On 01/05/2017 08:27 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:24:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> The solution is simply a lower bus factor in all Debian services,
>> including the BTS [...]
>
> Could you explain "lower bus factor" a bit more, please?
Hello Paul,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:24:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The solution is simply a lower bus factor in all Debian services,
> including the BTS [...]
Could you explain "lower bus factor" a bit more, please?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> What about requiring signed mail for closing a bug report?
We have sponsored maintainers, who theoretically could get by entirely
without an OpenPGP key. I don't know if any exist but I don't think
they should be blocked from -done. Also,
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 23:26 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 07:25:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Banning those words in the Subject-line to our BTS would be too hars.
>
> ITYM "won't".
What about requiring signed mail for closing a bug report?
--
Cheers,
Abou
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Probably we don't have enough people looking at the spam reports. That
> > probably could be improved with better advertising, e.g. on
> > https://www.debian.org/intro/help
>
> Right now only the BTS admins can look at and act on spam
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Probably we don't have enough people looking at the spam reports. That
> probably could be improved with better advertising, e.g. on
> https://www.debian.org/intro/help
Right now only the BTS admins can look at and act on spam reports.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 12:29:35AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I've reported abuse multiple times via the link at the foot of the bug page
> but
> nothing changed.
Probably we don't have enough people looking at the spam reports. That
probably could be improved with better advertising, e.g.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 07:25:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Banning those words in the Subject-line to our BTS would be too hars.
ITYM "won't".
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 12:29:35AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Since last month I'm really stuck with a spammer closing this very same
> bug#472304 as soon as I reopen it.
>
> I've reported abuse multiple times via the link at the foot of the bug page
> but
> nothing changed.
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 00:29 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Since last month I'm really stuck with a spammer closing this very same
> bug#472304 as soon as I reopen it.
>
> I've reported abuse multiple times via the link at the foot of the bug page
> but
> nothing changed.
That
Dear All,
Since last month I'm really stuck with a spammer closing this very same
bug#472304 as soon as I reopen it.
I've reported abuse multiple times via the link at the foot of the bug page but
nothing changed.
Can anyone help please?
bug#472304:
14 matches
Mail list logo
