Re: [Fwd: Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers]

2006-05-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 19:43 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit : Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris history) Solaris history is indeed legendary, but not for its stability. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'

Re: [Fwd: Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers]

2006-05-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:30:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le samedi 20 mai 2006 à 19:43 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit : Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris history) Solaris history is indeed legendary, but not for its stability. Well, when you consider

[Fwd: Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers]

2006-05-20 Thread Ron Johnson
---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Leigh wrote: Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 12:32 -0500, Michael Banck wrote: We had a pure NetBSD port before, but so far no non-glibc port got added to the archive officially (but that

Re: [Fwd: Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers]

2006-05-20 Thread Erast Benson
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 20:32 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: If you aren't getting Solaris-specific features (dtrace, etc ?), then what's the point of running Solaris? Nexenta is absolutely rock stable OS (thanks to legendary Solaris history) and moving towards running any applications written for