On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
[3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze
Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that
the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:01:51AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
What we need, is a task management system almost like our bug tracking system.
A way we can express task that have to be done before next relese or any other
tasks
goal we wants to achive. A
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
[3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze
Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that
the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the next
stable release.
I propose to create a meta-package called
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I propose to create a meta-package called 'release-status-sarge' that
depends on packages (with version number) that we want to see in sarge.
I don't think that the most important release goals can be expressed in
terms of
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
[3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze
Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that
the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the next
stable release.
5 matches
Mail list logo