Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan [was: Re: Future releases of Debian]

2003-08-02 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] [3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan [was: Re: Future releases of Debian]

2003-08-02 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:01:51AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: What we need, is a task management system almost like our bug tracking system. A way we can express task that have to be done before next relese or any other tasks goal we wants to achive. A

[PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan [was: Re: Future releases of Debian]

2003-08-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] [3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the next stable release. I propose to create a meta-package called

Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan [was: Re: Future releases of Debian]

2003-08-01 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I propose to create a meta-package called 'release-status-sarge' that depends on packages (with version number) that we want to see in sarge. I don't think that the most important release goals can be expressed in terms of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan [was: Re: Future releases of Debian]

2003-08-01 Thread Bruce Sass
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] [3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze Reading the whole Future releases of Debian thread, I thought that the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the next stable release.