Hi,
We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
* keep a Debian specific implementation and tag this bug wontfix
* reapply the patch to fix this bug, and report bugs on the packages that
uses this feature
Could you document and wait until etch release?
The ideal way to approach this is to announce a change,
Which is what we are doing now. We neglected to do so the first time
(mostly because we didn't anticipate this would break pbuilder so
much) and this is why we reverted the change very quickly.
document that change, provide some
Hi,
support for that change (like POSIXLY_CORRECT)
Then change.
We've got quite a bit of tools in sarge that doesn't work with
this change, right?
From what Nicolas investigated, not that much. He only found dchroot
and pbuilder up to now. Nicolas does not pretend to have a
FWIW, pbuilder in sid is fixed since 0.129 (17 August 2005),
and I am hoping that will
probagate into some stable backports, so that practically,
pbuilder side is ready for the new su.
Well, this is actually great news as pbuilder was by far the main
blocker for this change. Sorry for
Hi,
Unfortunately, this broke pbuilder (see #317264), and other Debian
packages (e.g. dchroot). So this patch was (at least temporarily) removed,
and the current behavior documented.
We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
* keep a Debian specific implementation
Quoting Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
* keep a Debian specific implementation and tag this bug wontfix
* reapply the patch to fix this bug, and report bugs on the packages that
uses this feature
Could you
6 matches
Mail list logo
