On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:05 +, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi Abou!
>
> I can't help with the issue at hand, but as general advice for the
> future: if you had Salsa-CI enabled at
> https://salsa.debian.org/pascal-team/fpc/-/pipelines the build-all and
> build-any jobs would have probably caught
Hi Abou!
I can't help with the issue at hand, but as general advice for the
future: if you had Salsa-CI enabled at
https://salsa.debian.org/pascal-team/fpc/-/pipelines the build-all and
build-any jobs would have probably caught this before upload.
Just open
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 10:58:58AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > I see only two possibilities, either upload manually fpc_3.2.2+dfsg-25 for
> > each missing architecture, or get fpc_3.2.2+dfsg-24 removed from archive and
> > replaced by fpc_3.2.2+dfsg-23 so that fpc_3.2.2+dfsg-25 can be
Hi All,
Can anyone help with below issue?
On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 09:17 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've uploaded a broken version fpc_3.2.2+dfsg-24 unfortunately.
> This prevents building arch independent packages due to a silly mistake.
> This issue does not appear when you
4 matches
Mail list logo
