Re: [Soc-coordination] Removing Spam from the Listarchives (was: Debian mailing lists archives as mbox

2011-08-05 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com): rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the unfiltered reports from clicks on the Spam buttons. Reports we get through the Spam buttons *are* reviewed by humans.

Re: [Soc-coordination] Removing Spam from the Listarchives (was: Debian mailing lists archives as mbox

2011-08-05 Thread Iain Lane
Hiya, On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com): rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the unfiltered reports from clicks on the

Re: [Soc-coordination] Removing Spam from the Listarchives (was: Debian mailing lists archives as mbox

2011-08-05 Thread Alexander Wirt
Olly Betts schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011: On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote: [we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts] Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination. as i wrote the review-stuff explained in

Re: [Soc-coordination] Removing Spam from the Listarchives (was: Debian mailing lists archives as mbox

2011-08-04 Thread Olly Betts
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote: [we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts] Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination. as i wrote the review-stuff explained in