On 18/06/2010 16:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Thomas Hood]
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new
hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one
for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the
latter hook script
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Vincent Danjean]
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
That is why I suggested to use a symlink too.
This I would propose to move the conffile to the new location, and add
a symlink in the old location to the new location, or just add a
symlink to the old
On 19/06/2010 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Should local modifications to the first script be
4 matches
Mail list logo
