Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:03:33AM +1000, Brian May
Richard wrote:
I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is
important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy
to fix (if you
Sorry, simple reply for the sake of testing out poor mail server.
Ben
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:05:26PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
How do you say this bug is important enough to be fixed for frozen?
Often, for instance, there are times when a really simple bug causes a
package to break seriously for some users. While the package should
not get dropped if it
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj
Richard Srivastava wrote:
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for
XEmacs (for VM users,
On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
CW == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
CW Instead of removing this package, couldn't we just change the Depends:
CW to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takuo KITAME) writes:
On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
CW == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
CW Instead of removing this
On 28 Mar 2000 05:13:39 +0200
Fred == Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takuo KITAME) writes:
On 27 Mar 2000 15:11:17 -0500
CW == Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
Package: epic4 (debian/main).
Maintainer: Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
58508 Epic pre2.503 has bugs which 2.505 has not
The bugs mentioned in this report do not affect everybody. 505 fixed a
few bugs sure, but it created a
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:03:33AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is
important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy to fix
(if you know what you are doing --- I don't).
[...]
I don't think it is worth dropping the package
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
I will start removing these
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
I will start removing these packages soon (unless they're too important,
in which case we have a
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were fixed by uploads I installed today.
I will start removing these
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:35:30PM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
This is the current list of bugs that are headed for the horizon.
I generated it from the bugscan report of Mar 26 15:08, and subtracted
the bugs that were
Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57287 generates wrong config files
[ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
uploads a fetchmail version that does not create a fetchmailconf package ]
I fixed this one! It was
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
I have spent the last 3 hours attempting to reproduce this with no
success. I have tried it both with and without
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Richard Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
(for VM users, for example). Only the interface between bbdb and gnus
in _one_ of the flavours
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard == Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Richard Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard 59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
This should not be a RC
Package: debianutils (debian/main).
Maintainer: Guy Maor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59121 run-parts hangs during /etc/cron.daily runs
There's a patch in the BTS. Does someone want to do an NMU or should I?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Package: bbdb (debian/main).
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59177 xemacs20 didn't compile bbdb-gnus on installation
Instead of removing this package, couldn't we just change the Depends:
to emacs20 | xemacs21 ?
--
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.verbum.org/levanti
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:14:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers écrivait:
Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main).
Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57287 generates wrong config files
[ Removing fetchmailconf means also removing fetchmail, unless someone
uploads a fetchmail
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for
emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for XEmacs
(for VM users, for example). Only the interface
22 matches
Mail list logo
