Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
[...]
It seems to me that the whole point of adding ‘patch’ as a (phony)
target is to allow a dependency on that target,
[...]
Hello,
Being used as dependencies of non-phony targets is the one thing phony
targets are not useful for. A phony
A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
a simple standarization will ease my heart
Today ``debian/rules build'' is always a good match
but there's no mandatory ``debian/rules patch''
Rafael Almeida almeida...@gmail.com writes:
A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
a simple standarization will ease my heart
Today ``debian/rules build'' is always a good
Nice poem :)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Rafael Almeida almeida...@gmail.com wrote:
A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
a simple standarization will ease my heart
Today ``debian/rules build'' is always a good match
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Rafael Almeida almeida...@gmail.com wrote:
A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
a simple standarization
Le Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
Rafael Almeida almeida...@gmail.com wrote:
A ``patch'' rule for debian/rules there should always be
for I'd like to easily apply patches created by me
Don't worry I don't think of anything too hard
a simple standarization
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:43:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
patch indeded is the standard way nowadays. See policy 4.9.
Unfortunately, it seems that with quilt, it is better ot use
$(QUILT_STAMPFN) in order to avoid a target to become phony.
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Unfortunately, it seems that with quilt, it is better ot use
$(QUILT_STAMPFN) in order to avoid a target to become phony.
What's wrong with having a phony target? We already have many of them,
and a
9 matches
Mail list logo
