On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:36:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
submitter?
I believe
submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
works just fine.
I'm quite
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:40:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than This is
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:24:34AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to
adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly
reported as non-RC, and neither your
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:33:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I didn't know a bug can have more than one submitter.
What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
submitter?
Not entirely the answer you're looking for, but submit a duplicate bug
and merge it.
--
* Mark Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 16:00]:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:33:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I didn't know a bug can have more than one submitter.
What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
submitter?
Not entirely the answer you're
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:01:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Mark Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 16:00]:
Not entirely the answer you're looking for, but submit a duplicate bug
and merge it.
No, don't do that.
It's ugly as hell and may well annoy the maintainer by creating noise
but
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer and
On 5/4/05, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you do immediately lower the severity of a bug I raised the severity
of again, could you please at least put my in the Cc header of the
message you send to the BTS?
No, that's not a requirement. If you want to receive notifications,
you should add
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
submitter?
I believe
submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
works just fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh
I know that downgrading RC bugs makes your RC bugs metric look better,
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh
Looking at the bug log,
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Looking at the bug log, it seems that you had no business increasing
the severity in the first place. You didn't report the bug, you
[...]
So now just people who are affected by bugs are allowed to report them?
And it's also
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to
adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly
reported as non-RC, and neither your Developers Reference nor your
release team have ever disagreed with this
Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Looking at the bug log, it seems that you had no business increasing
the severity in the first place. You didn't report the bug, you
[...]
So now just people who are affected by
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer and the rest of the Debian world about
the seriousness of the
severity 306015 important
quit
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh
If you are
18 matches
Mail list logo
