Dale Scheetz writes:
You can't ever remove A. Systems pre-split must always be upgradable to
systems after the split.
They would still be upgradable: they'd just revert to what I understand to
be the present behavior: A vanishes. But, ok.
Doesn't necessarily mean that this isn't a workable
I think you need to install the new nfs-server package.
Yeah, I got bit by that too, and it took me a while to find that...
maybe we need some sort of transitional-recommends field? Something
that is ignored if you are installing the package (to avoid causing
even more pain to dselect users,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote:
Yeah, I got bit by that too, and it took me a while to find that...
maybe we need some sort of transitional-recommends field? Something
that is ignored if you are installing the package (to avoid causing
even more pain to dselect users, or something),
Mark W. Eichin wrote:
Yeah, I got bit by that too, and it took me a while to find that...
maybe we need some sort of transitional-recommends field? Something
that is ignored if you are installing the package (to avoid causing even
more pain to dselect users, or something), but noticed on an
On 7 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about this?
A_1.0-0.1 is going to split into B and C. So you create a dummy A_1.0-0.2
package which depends on B and C and upload it along with B and C. Anyone
who upgrades and has A will get it upgraded to A_1.0-0.2, which will pull in
B and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you need to install the new nfs-server package.
Yeah, I got bit by that too, and it took me a while to find that...
maybe we need some sort of transitional-recommends field? Something
that is ignored if you are installing the package (to avoid causing
even
M == M Dietrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Please test out this new release of APT; we hope everyone can
Ben enjoy it!
M this apt is really great! thnx alot for your work (just for not
M only sending bug-reports on apt)! it worked out to exchange
M sendmail for smail
7 matches
Mail list logo
