Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Blacklisters may have the right to speak and *say* what they think I should do, but they have no right to be heard. Your post only rated a 1.5 on my trollometer. Please try harder. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-02 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, but you have not the right (what loaded words!) to close the bug reports. Feel free to ignore them, but don't close them without a better reason. If communication with the reporter is necessary to fix the bug, and this communication is broken

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 09:45:35AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:55:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: I suggest you close bugs filed by such people without comment. Call it the Malicious Blacklist User Behavior Modification System. Of course, you could always

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 09:45:35AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Of course, you could always just get the work done and email back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; since it'll go through Debian the email will indeed arrive just fine.

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Blacklisters may have the right to speak and *say* what they think I should do, but they have no right to be heard. If you have the right to refuse to listen to me on my terms, I have the right to refuse to listen to you on

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 06:32:50PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Yes, but you have not the right (what loaded words!) to close the bug reports. Feel free to ignore them, but don't close them without a better reason. I would close such bugs if I need further information (and can't reproduce

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: You should at the very least mention why you're closing the bug report. It may, for example, be the case that user is unaware that their usual mail system uses the DUL or whatever. Randomly closed bugreports will just annoy people

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: You should at the very least mention why you're closing the bug report. Did you bother to read my close message? Obviously not. I did in fact include an

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-31 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:50:09PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: If you wish to email me about any of my packages, do so from an address which does not reject my mail as coming from a dialup IP. My IP is STATIC and your ISP is run by morons who can't tell the difference, even though I am no

Re: ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-31 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:55:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: I suggest you close bugs filed by such people without comment. Call it the Malicious Blacklist User Behavior Modification System. Of course, you could always just get the work done and email back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; since it'll

ATTN: pjw@edmc.net

2000-03-30 Thread Joseph Carter
If you wish to email me about any of my packages, do so from an address which does not reject my mail as coming from a dialup IP. My IP is STATIC and your ISP is run by morons who can't tell the difference, even though I am no longer listed on the DUL. I am attempting once and once only to reach