On 11/27/2015 07:03 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 17:49 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:30:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>>> But systemd doesn't support sysvinit scripts in runlevel S, so it would
>>> still be necessary to add native systemd units.
>>
❦ 28 novembre 2015 21:26 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
> After this discussion, I'm still not sure what needs to be done in the
> init script. Should we do:
>
> -# Required-Start:$local_fs $remote_fs
> +# Required-Start:
> # Required-Stop:
> +# X-Start-Before:networking
> -#
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 17:49 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:30:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > But systemd doesn't support sysvinit scripts in runlevel S, so it would
> > still be necessary to add native systemd units.
>
> What do you mean by "doesn't support"? Systemd
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 14:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
> >
> > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
> > > >
> > > > So I don't
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:30:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> But systemd doesn't support sysvinit scripts in runlevel S, so it would
> still be necessary to add native systemd units.
What do you mean by "doesn't support"? Systemd in debian has a patch that
preserves ordering of runlevel S
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
>>>
>>> So I don't really get your complaint.
>>
>> Oh, thanks for pointing this out.
>>
>> So if I
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:18:11 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
>> ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
So I don't really get
On 11/27/2015 11:51 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789214
>
> There's a unanswered question by release
>
>> Assertions like the above aren't very convincing, sorry. Please
>> describe the
❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
>>
>> So I don't really get your complaint.
>
> Oh, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> So if I understand correctly, just adding $network to the line:
>
> #
Hi,
tl;dr: We'd likt to be able to update key cloud packages in Stable, as
we consider them being just like Kernel drivers for the cloud.
Longer version:
During a discussion in the debian-cd and debian-cloud list (cross-posts
discussion), we all agreed that we would really like to have a more
Hi!
Thomas Goirand writes:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789214
There's a unanswered question by release
> Assertions like the above aren't very convincing, sorry. Please
> describe the issue better; I can't see a good description of the issue
> and
11 matches
Mail list logo