On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:34:20PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi Anthony,
On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
Things I did today:
2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060115 10:00]:
If you remove cruft from one of your packages, do you start notifying
developers on d-d-a?
In case of the developers reference, I did.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:20:33AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060115 10:00]:
If you remove cruft from one of your packages, do you start notifying
developers on d-d-a?
In case of the developers reference, I did.
That's a bit of a special case, no?
Hi,
I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html
The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only
since then.
Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice
Hi AJ,
On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
Things I did today:
2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh).
Coincidence? You decide.
URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts
Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
Things I did today:
2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh).
Coincidence? You decide.
URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts
Hi Anthony,
On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote:
Things I did today:
2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh).
Coincidence? You decide.
URL:
* Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-13 20:34:20]:
...and no one can complain afterwards.
you underestimate your fellow nagg^Wdevelopers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-13 20:34:20]:
...and no one can complain afterwards.
you underestimate your fellow nagg^Wdevelopers.
Well, there are always people who complain. But posting development
related mails to
9 matches
Mail list logo