On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:21:55PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal,
which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in
your debian/control
* Wouter Verhelst [Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:14:26 +0100]:
Yes, but only if packages who declare build-depends-indep without having
build-arch exist. Anyone feel like finding that out? ;-)
Simon run a test through the archive prior to sending his mail, to
find out.
--
Adeodato Simó
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:46:38AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
dpkg (1.10.15) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix detection of va_copy.
* Back out debian/rules build-arch detection. It is *not* possible *at
all* to detect available targets in a rules file. Period.
-- Adam
Hi,
while I must admit that I was not at the latest IRC meeting where this
topic came up, I am now bitten by this problem.
I maintain a bunch of kernel modules that can be either patched onto a
kernel tree or built out-of-tree. No problem, have arch:all packages for
patch and source and
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- If a package has both Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep, it
MUST have a build-arch target
Would probably catch 95% of all cases. So far, I know no existing
packages that don't have those targets but use both B-D and B-D-I.
I know tons of such
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has been tried, does not work.
AFAIK it is working as long as you assume debian/rules to be a Makefile,
which is a pretty safe assumption
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has been tried, does not work.
AFAIK it is working as long as you
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:45:07PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
There have been various proposals on that matter, and it always boils
down to the same chicken-and-egg problem:
- policy documents existing practice, which is to invoke build.
- the existing practice cannot be changed because
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Questions? Comments? Seconds?
Yet another proposal to solve this problem can be found in #229357
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:31:08 +0100, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:45:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:59:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:36:40PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
To summarize the proposals so far:
- Scan debian/rules, invoke build-arch if present.
Has
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:17:36PM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 07:45:10PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
The difference between the two is that -q checks whether a target is
uptodate and return an appropriate exit code, while -p prints out the
data base (i.e. the rules
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal,
which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in
your debian/control file, you must also implement build-arch and/or
build-indep.
* Wouter Verhelst [Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:08:00 +0100]:
And I would strongly suggest you to consider Simon Richter's proposal,
which sounds a lot cleaner to me: if you have build-depends-indep in
your debian/control file, you must also implement build-arch and/or
build-indep.
Additionally,
16 matches
Mail list logo
