On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:50:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If you consider my approach useful in principle I would start a
> discussion on the Debian Med mailing list about the practical details.
> If you have general criticism about my approach please tell me in
> advance and give hints
Hi Enrico,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:09:16AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> I had a look at the diff[1].
>
> Biology is not at all my field, and the "biology" facet is clear and
> bounded enough that I have no objections to pretty much any change in
> it. Feel free to take care of it as you
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 13:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> I was guided by
> the consideration that everything that has (could have) a mime type
> might be specified as works-with-format::*. The fact that there is an
> ongoing effort to register mime types was motivating me for the change.
>
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:42:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 13:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [...]
> > I was guided by
> > the consideration that everything that has (could have) a mime type
> > might be specified as works-with-format::*. The fact that there is an
>
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 15:10 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ben Hutchings]
> > I don't think it's there yet, but AppStream will get some support from
> > upstream developers (including through existing .desktop files)
> > whereas debtags presumably doesn't.
>
> It is already possible to
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:42:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 13:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [...]
> > I was guided by
> > the consideration that everything that has (could have) a mime type
> > might be specified as works-with-format::*. The fact that there is an
>
2016-02-08 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 15:10 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Ben Hutchings]
>> > I don't think it's there yet, but AppStream will get some support from
>> > upstream developers (including through existing .desktop files)
>> >
[Ben Hutchings]
> I don't think it's there yet, but AppStream will get some support from
> upstream developers (including through existing .desktop files)
> whereas debtags presumably doesn't.
It is already possible to search for packages announcing support for
MIME types, and the data set is
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I'm also entirely in favour of the restructuring of facet to remove the
> > tags under biology, that I agree belong in the biology facet.
>
> Sorry, I do not understand this sentence.
I mean, I'm ok with this part of the patch:
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:55 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:42:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 13:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I was guided by
> > > the consideration that everything that has (could have) a mime type
> > >
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:24:22PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> GNOME Software can do that, AFAIK - but it will not do that for
> non-GUI applications, which is a design decision by GNOME.
> So, to get support for this beyond appstreamcli, someone would need to
> write a small tool for it.
Hi Enrico and who else might be interested in DebTags,
thanks a lot for your continuous effort about DebTags. It is really
appreciated and comes perfectly right in time since our current Debian
Med sprint finally was dedicated to tagging and categorising and finding
some common denominator with
12 matches
Mail list logo