On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It's strange, because on my i386 system
objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
00045ebc gDF .text 014c Base_gdk_windowing_window_init
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:30:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It's strange, because on my i386 system
objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
00045ebc g
It's strange, because on my i386 system
objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
0002e71c gDF .text 0049 Base_gdk_display_x11_get_type
00045ebc gDF .text 014c Base_gdk_windowing_window_init
0005017c gDF .text 0106 Base
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
reference to `Xine
ramaIsActive'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
reference to `Xine
ramaQueryScreens'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
reference to `Xine
ramaIsActive'
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
reference to `Xine
ramaQueryScreens'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure:7589: $? = 1
Hello,
I tried to investigate the problem a little bit deeper. The problem seems
to be hidden in the configure script and I have no idea how to fix that.
This is from a build which I tried at crest.debian.org in an unstable chroot
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Package: libgtkdatabox
Version: 1:0.2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
libgtkdatabox fails to build from source on m68k.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps the most important part of the build log shoulc be quoted as well:
Or not.
The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
libglib1.2-dev (= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2-dev (= 1.2.10-4)
Which is just that the central src deps are out of
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, James Troup wrote:
Which is just that the central src deps are out of date and happens on
all architectures. It says (probably) for a reason; the central
source deps are always guess work even when they're up-to-date.
Thanks for the clarification.
Checking for already
9 matches
Mail list logo