Thanks for the comment - I have already abandoned this ITP.
Millis
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 02:42, Miles Bader wrote:
Lukas Geyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not really sure that email satisfies this criterion. Maintaining
non-free packages is a hassle, it might be easier to write a free
Lukas Geyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not really sure that email satisfies this criterion. Maintaining
non-free packages is a hassle, it might be easier to write a free
replacement in the time saved by messing around with non-free packages
and getting special Debian redistribution
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
OK, let me see if I can address all the comments I've received so far.
[...]
Thanks, for your explanations, but i think that the most important issue here
is the license.
You'd better keep in touch with upstream author and try to
I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling to
convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make it
suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate to me
how the license shoudl be changed to be suitable for the non-free
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 11:05 US/Eastern, Luca - De Whiskey's - De
Vitis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
* License : Custom
Its license is non-free, not Custom:
*
...
*
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling
to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make
it suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate
to me how the license shoudl
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
* License : Custom
What other package would you suggest that does the same functionality then
insteard? I specifically was interested in this one because of the mime
encoding of the signature/encryption functionality.
Millis
Millis Miller wrote:
I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see mwilling to
convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can do is to make it
suitable for the non-free section for the time being. Can you indicate to me
how the license shoudl be changed to be
#include hallo.h
* Adam Heath [Mon, Jun 30 2003, 12:05:06PM]:
Well, if we had voting on NEW packages, this would be first on my list of
software never to be allowed into debian. The name is wrong, and the author
appears to have a bubble on his neck that needs to be burst, if he thinks
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
What other package would you suggest that does the same functionality then
insteard? I specifically was interested in this one because of the mime
encoding of the signature/encryption functionality.
apt-cache show bash
Hi Steve!
You wrote:
I object to this ITP. The software in question is both trivial and
non-free. Those features which are not a subset of mime-construct
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) are either irrelevant to Debian
systems (direct SMTP-based mailing) or a bad idea (encouraging users to
store pgp
Millis Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see
mwilling to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can
do is to make it suitable for the non-free section for the time
being. Can you indicate to me how the license shoudl be
Hi,
Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
* License : Custom
Description
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
* License : Custom
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
*
Benj. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
I understand that email is the name of the upstream client but I'd
like to urge you
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
This from Upstream:
A) Email users SMTP or Sendmail. (Main purpose!)
Which would make it the only piece of mail-aware software on the system
that doesn't depend on a working /usr/sbin/sendmail; so this is great as
long as you
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:33:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
E) Email does binary attachments and uses MIME (mime types, base64
encoding) to attach and send them with the message. You can't do this
by doing what is described
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:32, Millis Miller wrote:
Description : Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP,
with optional encryption
Also, if gpg is installed, it can digitally sign and encrypt outgoing
emails.
Just out of curiosity: inline PGP, or PGP/MIME
cheers
-- vbi
OK, let me see if I can address all the comments I've received so far.
1. Description too long.
OK, I will change it to a shorter one, once I work out how to do that
with an ITP.
2. Various questions along the line of What does email do that a
certain shell sequence doesn't.
This from Upstream:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Dean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
* License : Custom
Description : Send email from command line,
22 matches
Mail list logo
