Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-16 Thread Fabien Ninoles
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk 1.0.2 (jdk-shared OR

Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk 1.0.2 (jdk-shared OR jdk-static). Alas, I sent a mail to wnpp because I don't like this

Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-15 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk 1.0.2 (jdk-shared OR jdk-static). Alas, I sent a mail to wnpp because I don't like this either, I would prefer a Depends: java (= 1.0.2) and let the