Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pau Garcia i Quiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: witty
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : EmWeb bvba
* URL : http://webtoolkit.eu/
* License : dual licensed (GPLv2, commercial)
Description : C++ web framework
* Pau Garcia i Quiles [Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:36:59 +0100]:
* Package name: witty
Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++ library and application server for
developing and deploying web applications.
If the author names their software Wt, why are you naming the package
witty and not wt?
--
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
Quoting Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Pau Garcia i Quiles [Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:36:59 +0100]:
* Package name: witty
Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++ library and application server for
developing and deploying web applications.
If the author names their software Wt, why are you
On 2008-03-28T16:46:26+0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
Because wt is so short and common that apt-cache search wt returns
and awful lot of results.
$ aptitude search 'wt'|wc -l
55
$ aptitude search '^wt$'|wc -l
0
The above is just data and not a desire to affect the package name either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/08 12:35, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-03-28T16:46:26+0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
Because wt is so short and common that apt-cache search wt returns
and awful lot of results.
$ aptitude search 'wt'|wc -l
55
$ aptitude search
6 matches
Mail list logo