Hi,
Frans Pop schrieb:
Right, and existing tools depend on the fact that it has always been tagged
Build-Essential. You can argue about changing that, but if you do you will
also need to agree on a transition period.
debootstrap has been fixed and that is why I am closing this bug report
Julien Cristau schrieb:
-- Daniel Schepler schep...@debian.org Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:29:27 -0800
I'm not sure how that can qualify as new.
Compared to some code in dak it is coming from the future. ;-)
The Build-Essential: yes field has been updated 2 months ago to better
match the declared
Torsten Werner wrote:
The Build-Essential: yes field has been updated 2 months ago to better
match the declared Depends in the package build-essential as requested
in bug #548801.
It seems there is a misunderstanding about the purpose of the
Build-Essential flag then.
Obviously it is not to
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Torsten Werner wrote:
The Build-Essential: yes field has been updated 2 months ago to better
match the declared Depends in the package build-essential as requested
in bug #548801.
It seems there is a misunderstanding about the
On Sunday 27 December 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
From that perspective apt should be tagged Build-Essential. Simply
because without apt you don't have a working build system.
apt is not and never was needed to build a package and
5 matches
Mail list logo
