2011/2/25 Shachar Shemesh shac...@debian.org:
and I have been
warned by the list masters that discussing a specific package's upstream
bugs on Debian-devel is off topic.
I dont think this is neither true nor what they said. Surely a discussion
about upstream bugs can become off-topic on
On 23/02/11 12:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2011, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Giving feedback over the
upstream trustworthiness is not the purpose of ITP bugs,
oh, hell yes, it is.
Where else should we discuss what software fits into Debian? debian-qa@ when
it's
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2011, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Giving feedback over the
upstream trustworthiness is not the purpose of ITP bugs,
oh, hell yes, it is.
Where else should we discuss what software fits into Debian? debian-qa@ when
it's too late?
and I have been
warned by the list
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shachar Shemesh shac...@debian.org
* Package name: libsafewrite
Version : 1.00
Upstream Author : Shachar Shemesh shac...@lingnu.com
* URL : http://www.lingnu.com/opensource/safewrite.html
* License : MIT
Programming
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shachar Shemesh shac...@debian.org
* Package name: libsafewrite
Version : 1.00
Upstream Author : Shachar Shemesh shac...@lingnu.com
* URL :
On 22/02/11 19:54, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Judging by what you consider 'small bugs' in
https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite/commit/efafcd4260375a41257709c7eb5a8d6065366849
why should anyone trust their important data to this library?
Feel free not to use it/file bugs against it. Giving
6 matches
Mail list logo
