Dear Debian developers,
On 04/15/2012 04:15 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
In my experience, EBNF and LL/SLR/LALR are widely known (they
are classic compiler terms), for the type of person who might be
interested in parser generators, but GLR isn't.
Thank you all for your feedback on the long
Hello,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:37:00 +0900
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
* Package name: dparser
Description : a scannerless GLR parser generator
DParser is a scannerless GLR parser generator based on the Tomita
algorithm. It is self-hosted and very easy to use.
Dear Charles,
On 04/14/2012 05:37 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
I would like to suggest to explicit the GLR, RPF, and perhaps EBNF
acronyms in the long description.
Thanks for your suggestions.
GLR means Generalized Left-to-right Rightmost deviation parser or
maybe Generalized LR parser. EBNF is
* Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch, 2012-04-14, 10:45:
I would like to suggest to explicit the GLR, RPF, and perhaps
EBNF acronyms in the long description.
Thanks for your suggestions.
GLR means Generalized Left-to-right Rightmost deviation parser or
maybe Generalized LR parser. EBNF is the
Hi,
On 04/14/2012 11:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Sure, they are also much more common than GLR. And if you are just
interested in parsing and not a computer scientists, there's a chance
you've never heard about any of them.
Based on two votes for extending the acronyms, I propose to change the
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch, 2012-04-14, 10:45:
I would like to suggest to explicit the GLR, RPF, and
perhaps EBNF acronyms in the long description.
GLR means Generalized Left-to-right Rightmost deviation parser
or maybe
Hello,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:12:48 +0200
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
I can't really imagine someone writing a parser using such tools
without having heard these acronyms first, though. And I'd risk
saying they are actually more widely known than their expansions.
During my
]] Adam Borowski
I can't really imagine someone writing a parser using such tools without
having heard these acronyms first, though. And I'd risk saying they are
actually more widely known than their expansions.
I've written parsers (using bison, though) and can't recall having heard
the
On 04/14/2012 01:12 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
I can't really imagine someone writing a parser using such tools without
having heard these acronyms first, though. And I'd risk saying they are
actually more widely known than their expansions.
Yeah, that's why I think the acronyms must be
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 15:09 +0300, Andrew Shadura wrote:
During my university studies I had a course dedicated to compilers
theory, but while I knew (and still know) the meaning of all those
abbreviations I rarely tried to spell them out in full, but rather was
always using their abbreviated
Hi,
On 04/14/2012 02:12 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I've written parsers (using bison, though) and can't recall having heard
the term GLR parser before. Maybe I'm unique in that respect, but I
doubt it.
Note that bison also supports building GLR parsers. That's a somewhat
recent addition,
* Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch [120414 13:32]:
On 04/14/2012 11:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Sure, they are also much more common than GLR. And if you are just
interested in parsing and not a computer scientists, there's a chance
you've never heard about any of them.
Based on two votes for
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
For the grammer I personally would prefer it expanded, though I
think it is more understandable as EBNF (Extended Backus-Naur Form)
Grammar than the other way around.
I agree -- in reinforces the fact that these are well-known terms
which are often
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:22:06AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
GLR means Generalized Left-to-right Rightmost deviation parser
or maybe Generalized LR parser. EBNF is the Extended BackusâNaur
Form. Acronyms like these - i.e. LL, LL(k), SLR, LALR - are
Le Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:00:52PM +0200, Markus Wanner a écrit :
* Package name: dparser
Description : a scannerless GLR parser generator
DParser is a scannerless GLR parser generator based on the Tomita
algorithm. It is self-hosted and very easy to use. Grammars are
written
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch
* Package name: dparser
Version : 1.26
Upstream Author : John Bradley Plevyak jplev...@acm.org
* URL : http://dparser.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C and Python
16 matches
Mail list logo
