On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoit g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit g62993...@rezozer.net
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL :
It would be nice if your initial upload would resolve the multiple issues
that were the cause for the package removal, rather than simply reintroduce
them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit g62993...@rezozer.net
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Hello:
On 16/08/12 10:39, Jon Dowland wrote:
It would be nice if your initial upload would resolve the multiple issues
that were the cause for the package removal, rather than simply reintroduce
them.
I am totally agree with you, and I am working on it.
I guess that you understand that I
Hello:
On 16/08/12 11:29, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoitg62993...@rezozer.net
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL :
Hello:
On 16/08/12 08:40, Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoitg62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoitg62993...@rezozer.net
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-devel@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
[2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
[2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl)
So I guess it must be
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho antti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi (16/08/2012):
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
removed in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
proper way to describe what happened to the package is removed from testing
-
a
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-devel@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
What let you think this?
Carelessness in investigating (looked at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html, noticed that the last news
entry was removal from testing and did not read closely enough to notice the
unstable
On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
[2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
[2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from
On Jo, 16 aug 12, 07:40:52, Neil Williams wrote:
Is this about using removable media to store the SSH private key to
login to machines which only have the public key? That would be useful
(but isn't that covered by existing PAM support?)
Well, by putting the SSH private key on a removable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit g62993...@rezozer.net
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description :
14 matches
Mail list logo
