Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Bourdaud nicolas.bourd...@gmail.com
* Package name: nemo
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Linux Mint Project r...@linuxmint.com
* URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:59:00PM +0100, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
Nemo is a complete fork of Nautilus 3.4 and its goal is to extend the Cinnamon
user experience to desktop and file management.
I don't think it is currently a sensible decision to introduce
duplicate GNOME3 packages into
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I don't think it is currently a sensible decision to introduce
duplicate GNOME3 packages into Debian. Nautilus 3.4 is currently
available through GNOME3, so this would introduce redundancy.
wheezy will have 3.4 but 3.6
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:23:16PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I don't think it is currently a sensible decision to introduce
duplicate GNOME3 packages into Debian. Nautilus 3.4 is currently
available through GNOME3,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:27:03PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:23:16PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I don't think it is currently a sensible decision to introduce
duplicate
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
You critized their packaging, but this appears to be an upstream fork
which is not just a sed regexp to replace the name.
I am just sharing my experiences so far. I tried to help them to fix
issues in mdm and my commits were
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:47:56PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
If people think it is worth keeping the nautilus codebase around, I
think it would be ok to have it packaged,
Hmm, are the GNOME developers
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:27:03PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, that's correct. But that's only one of the points of my
criticism. I am in general not very much convinced by the quality of
the packages in Linux Mint.
Neither am I. I did look at cinnamon and muffin briefly, saw
8 matches
Mail list logo