On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:51:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > [CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
> > So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> > /usr/bin/rename,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
[CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Back in 2004 before I was a debian developer, I was looking to package a
script I wrote called patmv. patmv was inspired by rename perl but has
slightly different behavior. You can find the thread about it here:
Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:28:03AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi Gregor,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
therefore named accordingly to
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:28:03AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi Gregor,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
therefore named accordingly to
Hi Gregor,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
therefore named accordingly to
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
in Debian.
Thanks for
On 2014-02-03 00:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 19:42 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
1) Have perl Depend on libfile-rename-perl (and therefore have the
latter become Priority: standard)
The usual solution would
[CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Niko Tyni wrote:
I suggest something like
- package
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
/usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
don't want to provide the utility from the perl package any more because
it's been added
Hi,
I regularly use rename(1) and miss it on non-Debian systems. The fact perl
provides it currently doesn't matter to me (or I'd argue any end user)
On 2 Feb 2014, at 15:12, Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li wrote:
A
maintained version is available as a separate package, libfile-rename-perl.
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:05:45 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
A
maintained version is available as a separate package, libfile-rename-perl.
This is a frustrating package name for an end user binary. Reminds
me of the difficulty I have remembering which package the LWP-tools
GET and HEAD live
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2014, 19:31 +0100 schrieb gregor herrmann:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:05:45 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
A
maintained version is available as a separate package,
libfile-rename-perl.
This is a frustrating package name for an end user binary. Reminds
me of
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 19:42 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
/usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
don't want to provide the
13 matches
Mail list logo
