Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still
working on it?
I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it
impossible to distribute the binary?
Yes,
I am currently working on profanity package. Libstrophe, its
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:32:05PM +0200, Stefano Rossi wrote:
Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still
working on it?
I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it
impossible to distribute the binary?
OpenSSL
Hello Dariusz and Andrey,
I'd love to see a Profanity package for Debian. Are you, Dariusz, still working
on it?
I also would like to know, why would the OpenSSL requirement make it impossible
to distribute the binary?
Thank you both,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 28 April 2014 22:23, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of
OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is
preferred over OpenSSL in the future.
At Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:22:59 +0200,
Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of
OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is
preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example:
No, please use a more secure
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:22:59AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl
* Package name: profanity
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : James Booth boothj5...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.profanity.im/
* License : GPL-3
Programming
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 09:32:00AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl
* Package name: profanity
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : James Booth boothj5...@gmail.com
* URL
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
Hey Andrey,
Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
distributable ?
--
Dariusz Dwornikowski,
Institute of
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
